|
September 07, 2010
A higher standard for those who don't need it
Among many of life's seemingly minor petty annoyances is the disparate treatment meted out by the City of Ann Arbor's garbage collection unit. Whether they enforce the rules depends on trashiness of the residents, and their willingness to comply with the rules. Now, you might assume that they would be harder on the trashier and less rule-abiding people, but this is not the case. In my neighborhood, homeowners who live in their own homes are expected to follow the rules. A violation (typically having too much trash so the lid won't close or not putting the refuse cart in the street so it can be picked up by the trucks automatic grabbing arm) will earn a refusal of service with a sticker placed on the cart spelling out the "violation." Ditto recycling violations. Homeowners quickly learn that if they are not neat and rule-following, their trash will not get picked up. This is such a minor annoyance that it wouldn't be worth a post except that it touches on a larger issue, which is that laws are not only for the law-abiding, but they increasingly tend to be enforced only against the law abiding. If a homeless man takes a leak in the park, he will not be cited, but if a guy wearing a suit took a leak in the park and the cops saw it, they'd nail him. I can understand why; the latter is more likely to have ID, to show up in court, to pay the fine, and much less likely to give lice and bedbugs to the arresting officer. I have to say that if I were the officer, I would feel the same way. And who is more likely to have Child Protective Services called on her for, say, whacking her disobedient brat? A trashy welfare mom or a nice middle class working woman? I think the answer is obvious. And of course, the most frequent violators of the recycling laws are the homeless types who make a living basically stealing from the City the cans and bottles for their ten cent deposits, which are of course loaded into their stolen supermarket shopping carts. Not once have I seen one of them cited. (If an annoyed citizen complained to a cop about this, he would do nothing except maybe roll his eyes over the citizen's cluelessness while giving him a lecture about "police priorities.") Need I mention littering? The few trashy people who litter (I mean the true littering classes who routinely throw garbage and diapers wherever they want and create 90% of the litter) are the very last who would get cited. That's because littering is what they do, so the laws aren't meant for them. The worst offenders have become an exempt class. Philosophically though, why should the laws (which are supposed to be the same laws for everyone) have more of a tendency to be enforced against people who are more law abiding? Aren't they in less need of the laws? So instead of singling out the generally law-abiding classes, wouldn't it be better in the long run to treat everyone the same way? MORE: To illustrate, I just photographed the carts placed in front of a typical student rental around the corner from me for collection. Carts are supposed to be at the curb three feet apart, with lids closed all the way. If my trash looked like the above picture, it would not have been collected. Hell, I might have even been cited for obstructing the sidewalk. These kids make me feel like an old chump! posted by Eric on 09.07.10 at 11:13 AM
Comments
But that's what the Wolverines just did to the Huskies! Eric Scheie · September 7, 2010 04:35 PM Philosophically though, why should the laws (which are supposed to be the same laws for everyone) have more of a tendency to be enforced against people who are more law abiding? Aren't they in less need of the laws? Philosophically, I have no idea, but psychologically, no. The lawless—whether above the law, beneath its consideration, or pure victims of it—are clearly aware of what law is and how it works, and they behave rationally in accordance with their knowledge. The illusion of universality exists only for those who need it, to justify their obedience, complicity, weakness, etc. Law is for—and for identifying—chumps. guy on internet · September 7, 2010 04:56 PM Some people have no respect for garbage. Others venerate it. M. Simon · September 7, 2010 07:15 PM The problem lies in how such behavior is punished. The aim today is to make people pay for what they've done, rather than making them correct what they've done. Empower the police to force people to immediately clean up their mess, and you would have less mess. Alan Kellogg · September 7, 2010 11:58 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2010
August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Who is encouraging the trampling?
In Honor Of The Latest Tea Party Victories Because we are all suspects, we have "no reasonable expectation of privacy"! Advertising No Quarter Leyenda Hoyt On Heinlein - My Heart Belongs to Daddy Going Gaga over double standards in understanding death Union Muscle In California Oops! We made a mistake!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That would never happen in Happy Valley. I say again, with more feeling, Fuck The Wolverines.