|
August 06, 2010
Why do we need more housing insanity?
In a post appropriately titled "Housing Insanity," Megan McArdle expresses astonishment over the fact that despite the horrendous consequences of the housing bubble and its fallout, the federal government is going full steam ahead to promote no equity home purchases: If you want to know why us libertarian types are skeptical of the government's ability to prevent housing market bubbles, well, I give you Exhibit 9,824: the government's new $1000 down housing program.Reading the details (100 percent financed vanilla mortgage, unemployed no problem, not even a mortgage insurance requirement) it all makes the head spin. Noting that "commentators left and right can agree that this is not a good idea" (because zero equity buyers have to suddenly sell their houses, they'll be unable to pay even brokerage fees and closing costs), McArdle speculates that the reason behind the reckless policy might be votes: The government is less worried about protecting itself from default than protecting itself from voters who want to buy a home at cheap rates. Small wonder they've decided to "help" low income homeowners into dangerous loans.Insane as such a policy is, reports like this make me worry that getting votes might not be the only reason behind them. And, The very existence of the Land Bank sends a chilling message to property owners as well as potential real estate investors. County officials have a free reign to implement their utopian vision of smart growth land use policy through the Land Bank. It is not hard to imagine the removal or relocation of entire neighborhoods "with the community's needs in mind."Right. Tear down the houses to end "sprawl." Move people into denser housing! Make them use public transportation! East German worker style housing where people are crowded together and told what to do is their idea of a "utopia." Now, while the above is just local government action, I worry that left-wing ideas get shared, and that the idea might be beginning to sink in that the ultimate beneficiaries of foreclosures in general might simply be government. If so, then it doesn't take much imagination to understand why encouraging irresponsible risk-taking and failure (in the name of "fairness," of course) would be seen as another way to hasten the destruction of private property. So maybe the government's housing policy isn't as insane as it seems. MORE: Glenn Reynolds thinks the problem is that these people are idiots. Idiots who've been entrusted with nuclear weapons, and their economic equivalents.At least idiocy is a somewhat more reassuring explanation than my little fit of paranoid speculation. Problem is, it takes the patience of a Zen master (which is a lot more patience than I have) to be reassured by the thought that the government is run by idiots. posted by Eric on 08.06.10 at 11:24 AM
Comments
Well, I'm generally an optimist, but I tend to be very suspicious of people who see failure as success. They have a vested interest in screwing things up! Worse is better! Eric Scheie · August 6, 2010 04:27 PM I don't think these fools realize that if they continue it will not be good for them. Parasites can have a very good thing going if they don't weaken the host too much. If they make the host sick, the host will fight back. Antibodies will develop. Fever will develop. Rejection of the foreign invader will develop. Simon's Law: M. Simon · August 6, 2010 05:08 PM I split that baby by understanding stupidity as a style of malice. guy on internet · August 6, 2010 05:29 PM They may be too stupid to understand the maliciousness of their policies. Of course, whether they're stupid or malicious, they probably think they're good! Eric Scheie · August 6, 2010 07:12 PM After all, this is the Administration of the double-down. If at first you don't succeed, try, try , again. I would buy a house w $1000 down only if I had access to a printing press. Gringo · August 8, 2010 11:52 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2010
July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Skip The Numbahs
Disease or wisdom? Texas Is NOT Happy Your opinion is a breach of the peace! And so is your camera! Had A SMART Event Lately? Why do we need more housing insanity? A Revolutionary Act All He Lost He Shall Regain A revolution both revolutionary and constitutional beware of marginalized outsiders who don't give a damn!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's funny, I always kind of think of you as someone who thinks somewhat like me except more optimistic or maybe more trusting of people or maybe just less paranoid, or all three.
Every now and then you outdo even my cynicism, paranoia and general mistrust of humankind.
These posts always scare me a lot.