|
June 17, 2010
The Narrative turns 38. But as to the facts, just shut up!
Today is the 38th anniversary of the famed Watergate break-in. The topic is of longstanding interest to me, and I continue to marvel over the fact that after all these years, the reasons for the burglary are still unsettled. Historians and Nixon scholars continue to wonder, while pondering various theories. The one thing that stands out is that principle accuser John Dean -- the man whose testimony brought down Nixon and sent people to prison -- was the architect of the burglary and the coverup. His story changed many times, and it appears to a number of people who have studied Watergate in detail that he ordered the burglary for personal reasons, and then later implicated others who had no idea what was going on. In exchange, he was allowed to walk, while those he implicated went to prison. There have been a number of books which have attempted to flesh out the details in an attempt to clarify history. John Dean has sued some of them, and threatened to sue others -- most recently James Rosen of Fox News, whose biography of John Mitchell concluded (after years of research) that the conventional version of the burglary (especially Dean's version that Mitchell ordered it) was wrong, and that Dean himself had ordered the burglary for personal reasons. As I observed last year, Little wonder he's threatening to sue.For those who are interested, here's an interview with Rosen: NRO's Kathryn Lopez has an interview with Rosen here. In what I think is a very significant new development, Geoff Shepard (author, "The Secret Plot to Make Ted Kennedy President") recently delivered a comprehensive 90 minute presentation which is a review of the prominent Watergate conspiracy books and more. Shepard came to similar conclusions about John Dean and if you are at all interested in Watergate, this video is an absolute MUST WATCH! It's called "The Mysteries of Watergate": May 24, 2010: Former Nixon Domestic Council official, Watergate defense lawyer, and author Geoff Shepard presented the fourth Richard Nixon Legacy Forum. Shepard spoke about the conventional wisdom of Watergate, five alternative perspectives on how the controversy unfolded, and the role of former White Counsel John Dean as the orchestrator of the cover-up.From the caption: May 24, 2010: Even forty years later, Watergate remains America's greatest political scandal. What is so interesting, at least to those who are interested in learning more about it, is that there is almost no agreement on the motivation for the original Break-in itself--or on whether the true culprits were those who actually executed the Break-in and the Cover-up or those they later alleged authorized and approved their illegal acts. Dozens of books have been written by principal Watergate players; hundreds of books and articles have been written by various commentators. Geoff Shepard's 90 minute presentation reviews the prominent Watergate conspiracy books and then explores a series of continuing uncertainties and concerns with what most Americans have been taught as 'conventional wisdom' about Watergate. It the course of it, he reveals some startling information about John Dean, one of the most prominent Watergate actors--and shows why we can expect Watergate controversies to continue well into the future.And here it is. If you can spare the time (and I know it's long), it's worth it. For more, see my previous posts, and be sure to watch the Key To Watergate video: It's interesting even if you're not a political junkie. Recommended reading includes Jim Hougan's groundbreaking Secret Agenda, Len Colodny's Silent Coup, James Rosen's Strong Man, and Geoff Shepard's The Secret Plot to Make Ted Kennedy President. As to why the history of such an important event still remains unsolved after all these years, why, it's the Narrative Principle at work. The Narrative is that Nixon was bad and evil, and had to be brought down by in a grand political pageant orchestrated by the sainted MSM, by that heroic whistle-blower named John Dean! As to the details, they don't matter. Shut up and think as you're told. posted by Eric on 06.17.10 at 12:24 PM
Comments
Watergate is the Mega Narrative -- the grandaddy of them all. It represents the ultimate triumph of Big Media in combination with their newly emerged allies. They have been in charge since, and they don't take kindly to people learning that their coup was built on a fraudulent foundation. So it's a tough nut to crack. Eric Scheie · June 17, 2010 04:54 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2010
May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Whiny Little Bitch
The Narrative turns 38. But as to the facts, just shut up! Tea? Party "Now watch this drive" An intergenerational con game of Orwellian proportions Isn't risky behavior supposed to be a guy thing? The Lobby The Gulf - It Is Worse Than We Thought As a Norwegian American, I'm feeling offended! So when's my hearing? Some One Is Missing
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's interesting how history has had its edges tidied up; do a google search on Mo Biner or Maureen Dean and tell me what you find.
Of course, using the Barney Frank template of not knowing that your roomie is running a prostitution ring out of your home is a reasonable defense against an implication that the roommate might have had an inkling of how that roomie was raising cash to pay
the rent. In the world of teh Democratics, such concerns as prostitution rings are beneath concern. Just visit the case of Elliot Spitzer.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
.