|
June 23, 2010
As the remarkable becomes unremarkable...
I often read things that bother me. Sometimes they are opinions with which I disagree, and other times they involve inaccuracies. Usually, I forget all about them, but sometimes, an item will still be bothering me the next day, and this is one of them. I did a bit of a doubletake when I read yesterday's front-page Wall Street Journal account about Faisal Shahzad's guilty plea: A Pakistani-born U.S. citizen, calling himself "a Muslim soldier" avenging U.S. attacks in Muslim countries, admitted Monday that he tried to detonate a crudely made car bomb in New York's Times Square in May.Excuse me, but "home-grown"? As opposed to "foreign-born"? You'd think the Wall Street Journal would at least know how to use Google -- or at least read the guy's Wiki entry. The was born in Pakistan, and came here to attend college on a student visa. Since when does attending college on a student visa constitute being "home-grown"? Considering the incredibly squalid, "near-subterranean" history of one of the colleges he attended (Southeastern, where he had a 2.78 GPA), a good argument can be made that his "higher education" was anything but "higher" and constituted the opposite of "growth," but still. Calling a foreign student "home-grown" is a misuse of the term. There is, of course, the man's 2004 arranged marriage (which feel apart soon after he got his citizenship and insisted that she wear a hijab and move back to Pakistan): On December 24, 2004, in an arranged marriage in Peshawar, Pakistan, he married Huma Asif Mian, a Pashtun Colorado-born U.S. citizen who had just graduated from the University of Colorado at Boulder with a degree in Accounting.[3][36][37][38][5][39] She and her Pakistani-born parents had lived in Qatar and Colorado; her parents now live in Saudi Arabia.[38] A neighbor recalled Shahzad visited the family only once before she joined him in Connecticut.Sorry, but I am not seeing anything that looks "home-grown." Clearly, this man's allegiance was never to the United States. A good question might be what the hell are we doing admitting people like that, much less allowing them to become citizens? But I'm sure others have asked similar rhetorical questions, which will never be addressed as long as we have a government that hands out visas and citizenship to people who are our sworn enemies. Then there's this incredible, self-contradictory statement: Mr. Shahzad had no history of support for jihad and had not appeared on the government's radar, even though he received terror training in Pakistan late last year.According to a CBS report, the man first appeared on the government radar in 1999. As to "no history of support for jihad" (as if terror training in Pakistan is art therapy), how about statements in support of the 9/11 attacks? In 2000 he transferred to the University of Bridgeport, where more than a third of the students were foreign students.[3] Shahzad's former teachers at the University of Bridgeport said he appeared to be quiet and unremarkable. On weekends, he would go to Bengali-theme nightclubs in New York City. A classmate remembered him watching new footage of the planes hitting the Twin Towers in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and saying: "They had it coming."[3] He received a B.A. in computer applications and information systems,[3][33] with his parents attending his graduation on May 13, 2002.[35] Just before graduation, in April 2002, he was granted an H1-B visa for skilled workers.[33] He remained in the U.S. for three years on that visa, earning an M.B.A at the University of Bridgeport in the summer of 2005.[33]Considering his background, perhaps his statement that "They had it coming" is unremarkable. What ought to be considered remarkable is that someone who thinks that way would be allowed to stay here after the attacks, be issued visa after visa, and finally become an American citizen. And then when he finally decides to strike out at the evil America he's never made any secret of hating, everyone acts surprised. And officials issue statements about how he might have been a mortgage foreclosure bomber. Now that he's had his day of glory in court, he will be an ongoing liability, and I shudder to think about how much it will cost the taxpayers to keep maintain him. (No doubt we'll have to foot the bill for the whatever imams he deems spiritually psychotic enough to minister to his religious needs as well....) Frankly, I'm so disgusted that I don't know what to say. Might it be easier to stop pretending we're at war? MORE: In other unremarkable news, police officers in the nearby city of Dearborn, Michigan arrested four Christian missionaries on "disorderly conduct" charges because they were handing out pamphlets on a public street near a Muslim event. Video here. Apparently, the authorities in Dearborn think the First Amendment does not apply there. Surely there's nothing remarkable about that! MORE: Regarding pretending we're not at war, I agree with what Gerard van der Leun said: Those who tell you, in government or in your personal life, that it is over are either lulling you into a deeper sleep, or fools more than half in love with easeful death. posted by Eric on 06.23.10 at 11:20 AM |
|
June 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2010
May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Your Next Senator Or Congressman
All Heck Is Breaking Loose Al Gore's emissions are not sustainable Those in charge of natural law have great power! Real storm? Or election year storm? BBC Covers Amateur Fusion Can't? Or won't? As the remarkable becomes unremarkable... Tariffs Got An Old Hard Drive?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Might it be easier to stop pretending we're at war?
Much of our political class seem to find it so, why don't you give it a shot?
At least you'll sleep better.
You know, before you're murdered in your sleep.
Hey, it worked in the 90s.