|
October 06, 2009
time to unwind with the restoration movement
What do vinyl records, slow food, mechanical watches, cloth diapers (and the more primitivistic diaperless movement), as well as what I think is the latest example (linked by Glenn Reynolds yesterday) -- running barefoot -- have in common? The old way was better? Bring back lost innocence? Things that evoke a return to simpler, more innocent times have enormous appeal, and while the modern glorification of primitive technology is not necessarily Luddism, the sentimental thinking involved reminds me of the noble savage meme. Back in the 1930s, people used to carry on about how silent films were... "better." While the YouTube video I saw at Ann Althouse's blog doesn't make the claim that the early Internet was "better," the popularity of the video is, I think, grounded in a yearning for the lost innocence -- and hopefully the restoration of -- earlier, supposedly better, times. Hey, where it comes to love of innocence, I'm equally guilty! Not only do I like the anachronistic Grateful Dead, but my favorite music of all is the Doowop music of the early 1960s, just before the British invasion. I might not be fanatic enough to demand hearing it on the original 45 RPM records (much less virgin vinyl), though. Any old MP3 file (or even RA file) will do. If we carry this into the personal, sexual realm, what about virginity restoration? Not only is there such a movement in the United States, but various clinics offer surgery. But more and more women maintain that there is such a thing as "reclaimed" virginity. Or "secondary renewed" virginity. Are these people merely fooling themselves? It's not my concern, and I don't see why this or any other sexual matter is the business of anyone other than the people involved. It's really of no concern to me that people might fetishize mechanical watches, even virgin "movements," so why should I care whether someone wants to restore a ruptured hymen? I hope they're not feeling pressured, though, because according to one website with a high Google ranking, the loss of virginity is often caused by "peer pressure." If that is so, it strikes me that substituting one form of peer pressure for another might not lead to true independence. But that's just me, and I have an admitted, probably anachronistic desire for that ever elusive thing called "independence." I can certainly understand why ceasing to have sex could lead to increased feelings of independence, but it seems to me that calling abstinence or chastity "virginity" does not make it so. Ceasing to ring a bell simply cannot "unring" it. In Europe, Muslim women are having the restorative surgery and then purchasing virginity certificates: Wrobel is one of an unknown number of gynecologists in France who are willing to repair hymens, the membrane usually broken by the first act of sexual intercourse. He was one of few doctors willing to talk about it.Well, it might. Surgery followed by "virginity certification" is a form of lying, especially if such a thing matters to a spouse, and it hardly seems like the basis for an honest and open relationship. OTOH, men who regard women as mere chattel are probably more concerned with their value and status (which would seemingly be increased) than honesty or openness. I don't know whether it's the Kaelian principle, but I don't know anyone into virginity restoration. But I think I can understand the appeal, and it ought not surprise anyone that entrepreneurs in Asia have come up with the closest thing possible to a virginity restoration kit: No more worry about losing your virginity. With this product, you can have your first night back anytime. Insert this artificial hymen into your vagina carefully. It will expand a little and make you feel tight. When your lover penetrate, it will ooze out a liquid that look like blood not too much but just the right amount. Add in a few moans and groans, you will pass through undetectable. Its easy to use, clinically proven non-toxic to human and has no side effects, no pain to use and no allergic reaction.I can't help notice that while it is being marketed as a sex toy, it is causing a great deal of consternation in the Mideast. Conservative Egyptian lawmakers have called for a ban on imports of a Chinese-made kit meant to help women fake their virginity and one scholar has even called for the "exile" of anyone who imports or uses it.Um, I can see why. A number of men in Asia are turned on by virginity, but because it's a sexual fetish with them, it's not so much real virginity they want as the appearance of it. Like men who pay prostitutes to dress as school girls, or gay men who fetishize having sex with "police officers." Which leads to the inevitable but unpleasant question. Is there a difference between real fake and fake fake? Women in the Mideast are looking for the "real" variety of fake virginity, because they genuinely want to pass themselves off as virgins. That is clearly not the idea behind the product, and I wouldn't be surprised if the Chinese manufacturers find the Mideast attitude confusing. From a purely business standpoint, it certainly wouldn't be their target market, because if you think about it, the goal is always repeat business, and women who seek "real" virginity restoration would in most cases only need the product for their wedding night, but not again. The real money is in the girls seeking repetitive fakery. The fake fakes. Hmmm.... Am I reversing things? Maybe the fake fakes are more real than the real fakes. This hall of mirrors thinking is all too much for me, as I only learned about this last night. Anyway, the Egyptian Brotherhood is pissed, and it all started because of Radio Netherlands: The fracas started when a reporter from Radio Netherlands broadcast an Arabic translation of the Chinese advertisement of the product. That set off fears of conservative parliament members that Egyptian women might start ordering the kits.I'm assuming the latter are incompatible with Netherlands values. I do not mean to be facetious. In the Mideast, people are quite willing to kill each other over this stuff. Prominent Egyptian religious scholar Abdel Moati Bayoumi said anyone who imports the artificial hymen should be punished.Thanks to the Internet, the product's very existence is publicly known, and said to be threatening the country's existence. The product is also causing a buzz on Egyptian blogs and news sites.But sticking it in the face of male hypocrites was not the idea behind the product! The idea was to offer a product that would turn men on. Or is there something wrong with that? (Some say yes, some say no, so I have to ask.) Back to the joys of mechanical watches: These timepieces give back to us that visual splendour of a beautiful work of art. Its very beating heart laid bear by the window into its soul, allows us to gaze upon it in wonderment at the intricacies of its moving micro-organs. The graceful sweep of the seconds hand enthrals the best of us. The rapid beat of the tick-a-tick-a quickens our own pulse. And aahh, the quiet whirr of the rotor as we swing our arms What do you call this, but pleasure of the highest order, from its existence on your wrist? What better feedback can we ask for? This and the comforting feeling that they will be by our sides faithful companions sharing our lives and experiences being there with us for a long time to come. Something that we cannot say for sure with the quartz. Once their life is up, they will fall by the wayside.No, I've long since ceased wondering. Come to think of it, I ceased wondering about the same time I ceased winding. posted by Eric on 10.06.09 at 10:36 AM
Comments
Even owning a watch is a useless affectation unworthy of modern thinkers. My mobile phone keeps atomic time, dude. It makes me laugh to hear a Tourneau advert descibing how some explorer asshole used his timepiece( even more expensive than a watch is a timepiece) to discover the fucking Titanic! Because it was water-resistant to 1000 feet! But I suppose that works here in the anti-intelligent, ignorant USSA. Pathetic. dr kill · October 6, 2009 02:28 PM Now that's a good anti-watch rant. I wish I could be with you, but I like watches, I always have. Veeshir · October 6, 2009 04:42 PM uhhhh.... there's a lot of useless crap passing as "progress". Ya gotta have a gimmick. Ya gotta create a new need - so you can sell a new product. Yet American capitalism long ago satisfied most basic human needs. A lot of change/redesign is not really motivated by anything but maintaining the illusion of progress. The old way really was just fine. Our food processor broke after 15 years of occasional service. When we went to the store, it was a whole new world. My wife latched on to a larger model with 3 bowls and wide mouth. "You can slice whole onions and potatoes" she said. The promotional photo showed a whole eggplant in the chute. "How often have you needed to do that? And how often did the amounts justify hauling out the processor, and then cleaning all the pieces?" It really is easier and quicker to do 90 percent of the day-to-day work with a good knife. Or a 50-dollar mandoline slicer that stores in a drawer. Similarly: - Do most people need all the functions on the typical digital watch? Or know how to use them? et cetera. Sure some of it is romanticism. But a lot of it is pushing back and throwing out the garbage that didn't really add to life. Ben-David · October 6, 2009 07:20 PM If these Chinese-made faux hymens are going to destroy the Middle East as we know it, can we carpet bomb the Taliban regions of Aghanistan, Sadr City, Iraq, and the entire Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with these devices, ASAP? Rhodium Heart · October 6, 2009 07:37 PM As long as the State of Arkansas can continue to ban sex toys, I think we might want to be modest in laughing about other cultures' hang-ups on sex. John Burgess · October 6, 2009 09:23 PM As long as the State of Alabama can continue to ban sex toys, I think we might want to be modest in laughing about other cultures' hang-ups on sex. John Burgess · October 6, 2009 09:24 PM Sorry about the double post. Arkansas was cited by mistake. John Burgess · October 6, 2009 09:25 PM Wind up watches have their problems. Mainsprings break. Dirt changes the time and sometimes stops them all together. I miss the old LED watches. They were such battery hogs that you never knew the time unless you pushed the button. Where is my old National Semiconductor watch? M. Simon · October 7, 2009 12:18 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2009
September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The difference between art and music
Nobel Prize Slap At Obama *** Media Threat Level Raised *** The winningest of all intentions An Epiphany On The Left? none dare call it corporatism Something Is Missing Scary Saturday Graph There's no saving this planet without a savior! Why we are all worse than Roman Polanski
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I've been looking for a wind-up watch, I miss mine.
I have two that take batteries, they're both in my nightstand because the batteries died and I haven't replaced them.
With a wind-up watch, I'll never have that problem.
In other words, I want a wind-up watch because I'm lazy.