|
June 01, 2009
Cobra coverage?
When I saw this video, I was a bit taken aback. It's easy to forget that (just as there are parents who'd strap a bomb on their baby) there are parents in the world who think it's cute to watch their baby play with a deadly snake. As the YouTube caption explains, there is a reason for it: It is beleived to be luck for a baby if he/she is touched by the snake on the head.Whether that view is grounded in religion, I don't know. Here in America any parents who let their child do that could be arrested -- whether they were religious or not. Even snake-handling religious sects (mostly illegal, even for adults), do not allow children to handle the snakes. Philosophically, is it politically "liberal" to stop them? Or is it "conservative"? Not that I'd let that influence my thinking; any more than I would be influenced by what doctrinaire libertarians might say; I think it's child abuse to let children play with deadly snakes, just as it would be to let them play Russian Roulette. Adults, OTOH, should be allowed to play with deadly snakes (barring harm to others, of course). Funny thing about this is that if you remove religion from the equation, the parents' behavior becomes somehow less forgiveable. It's as if they're given a "break" (at least considered less morally culpable by most people) if they watch their kid play with a cobra because they think some deity approves. By that standard, parents who strap bombs on children for "Allah" are less guilty than parents who might blow up their children for purely political reasons. And the latter, while more guilty than religious criminals, are nonetheless less culpable than parents who would blow up their children to collect on an insurance policy. Similarly, a mob hit man who has "nothing personal" against the guy he blows away is more guilty of the requisite malice than a guy who is consumed by hatred or jealousy. (No actual malice in the personal sense thus equals more malice in the legal sense.) Which is a convoluted way of saying that the video of the baby handling the cobra reminded me of today's news story about the guy who apparently thought he was killing an abortion doctor for religious reasons. Do his religious views make him more guilty or less guilty? Or are they irrelevant? posted by Eric on 06.01.09 at 05:13 PM
Comments
I don't know whether the snake in the video is intact, (and for all I know, they might also sew the snake's mouth shut). That certainly would make a huge difference in terms of parental culpability, although the hypothetical purpose in my discussion is the same. As to snake handlers, anyone who's familiar with snakes knows that the more they're handled, the tamer they become, and the less likely to bite. (Religion has nothing to do with that, but the idea of responsibility for what might happen is the same.) Eric Scheie · June 1, 2009 05:47 PM The only way I can consider Tiller's murderer' religious view relevant is if they can be considered a symptom of his apparent insanity. Not, perhaps, insanity in the legal sense, but in my personal view that one has to be at least a bit insane to commit murder. Donna B. · June 2, 2009 01:22 AM Indeed, I've read that the snake's mouth is sewn shut. Looks right, because the snake strikes without even opening its mouth. This is apparently an old snake-charmer trick. SteveBrooklineMA · June 2, 2009 01:10 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2009
May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
It's An Absolute Disgrace
The Seeds Of Stupidity Remember D-Day Newton's Cradle Taxes Send Jobs Offshore The law is the law! A teaching moment? You Can't Do It At Random In debt to Islam? For Western thought? David Carradine Is Dead
Links
Site Credits
|
|
If it makes you feel any better, I think they usually pull the snakes' fangs out.