you can't hug a jihadi with nuclear arms

In a piece titled "Words Matter in the War on Terror," Raymond Ibrahim decries the inability of the Obama administration to call terrorists terrorists, or even use words like "jihadi":

Would the free world have understood the Nazi threat if, instead of calling them what they called themselves, "Nazis," it had opted to simply call them "extremists" -- a word wholly overlooking the racist, expansionary, and supremacist elements that are part and parcel of the word "Nazi"?

Unfortunately, the U.S. government, apparently oblivious to this interconnection between language and knowledge, appears to be doing just that. Even President Obama alluded to this soon after taking office when he said, "Words matter in this situation because one of the ways we're going to win this struggle [war on terror] is through the battle of [Muslims'] hearts and minds."

According to an official memo, when talking about Islamists and their goals, analysts are to refrain from using Arabic words of Islamic significance ("mujahidin," "salafi," "ummah"); nor should they employ helpful English or anglicized words ("jihadi," "Islamo-fascism," "caliphate"). Instead, vague generics ("terrorists," "extremists," "totalitarians") should suffice.

One of our biggest fears (terrorists getting hold of a nuke) happens to be one the greatest threats in the world right now. But I guess if you're, you know, an enlightened and informed journalist for the New York Times, you can do your part to stop the threat by going out of your way not to offend those who consider nuking Manhattan their number one goal:
WASHINGTON -- As the insurgency of the Taliban and Al Qaeda spreads in Pakistan, senior American officials say they are increasingly concerned about new vulnerabilities for Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, including the potential for militants to snatch a weapon in transport or to insert sympathizers into laboratories or fuel-production facilities.

The officials emphasized that there was no reason to believe that the arsenal, most of which is south of the capital, Islamabad, faced an imminent threat. President Obama said last week that he remained confident that keeping the country's nuclear infrastructure secure was the top priority of Pakistan's armed forces.

But the United States does not know where all of Pakistan's nuclear sites are located, and its concerns have intensified in the last two weeks since the Taliban entered Buner, a district 60 miles from the capital.

Will calling them "insurgents" and "militants" give them pause? Will they now wake up and realize the ultimate truth of the slogan "A single nuclear bomb can ruin your entire day" and announce their own unilateral freeze and an end to all the madness?

I wish I felt more reassured.

posted by Eric on 05.04.09 at 08:54 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/8216






Comments

Except at the time didn't Nazi just refer to the National Socialist Democratic Party, which doesn't sound that bad. The term gained all those evil connotations after the war when it became well known what they were doing. In other words, whatever they were called probably would have gained the connotations that Nazi now has.

Though I agree with you 100% on how the administration is using labels to somehow try to make us forget the war that is going on.

Bolie Williams IV   ·  May 4, 2009 07:23 PM

"you can't hug a jihadi with nuclear arms"

Yes, you can. But only once.

Well, once per jihadi, and once per bomb.

Billy Oblivin   ·  May 5, 2009 08:18 AM

June 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits