|
April 28, 2009
A hopeless debate?
Dr. Helen's discussion of suicide (especially the role of cognition in suicide prevention) reminded me of a vintage film I had the pleasure to watch recently. Charles Chaplin wrote and directed Limelight in 1952 (when his career was in tatters and he was about to be unceremoniously kicked out of the United States), and he plays an autobiographically based character who saves a beautiful young woman from suicide. The problem is that saving her from physical suicide did not supply her with any will to go on living, so the two of them get into a philosophical debate. It's fascinating to see this washed-up, once-great comedian (reduced to being a Skid Row denizen) offer wonderful reasons for living, because she's the one who should be wanting to live, and he's the one who by all rights should have given up. It's beautiful and compelling logic, and thanks to the wonders of the Internet, I found the dialogue here (the clown is Chaplin; the ballerina is the girl he saved): Ballerina: I can't stay here, causing you all this trouble.Sorry, but "live without hope" is just brilliant. I've often heard it said that hopelessness is a primary cause of suicide, yet I've rarely seen such a poignant refutation of the idea that hopelessness is a legitimate argument in favor of suicide. The "clown" is absolutely right of course. Even in the total absence of hope for the future, there can always be wonderful moments in the present. And if the future sucks (or seems to) such moments can also serve as wonderful distractions. (Needless to say, Chaplin's character has no money and cannot even pay his rent; but the idea of that as a reason for suicide is as comical as the tactics he uses to stall the ever-clueless landlady.) With hopelessness thus rendered irrelevant as a justification for suicide, Chaplin then (without skipping a beat) moves directly to the concept of happiness. Rejecting the logic that the lack of happiness is grounds for suicide, he argues in favor of replacing it with the fight for happiness. And if you think about it, happiness is worth fighting for whether you get there or not. Isn't there something in the Declaration of Independence to the effect that we all share a right to pursue happiness? I don't think it's much of a stretch to say the fight for happiness is beautiful. And hopelessness is a judgment Back to Dr. Helen: It is not your job to be the therapist of a depressed spouse or friend, but do some reality testing. If the depressed person says things are hopeless, counter with some evidence to the contrary. If other people are putting your loved one down at work, in the news, or in general, reassure them that you do not feel this way and let them know that they they are more than what other people think about them. What other people think changes with the culture. Today's scapegoat can be tomorrow's comeback kid. As one of my favorite bumper sticker says, "No condition is permanent."Absolutely true. Anyone who's had so much as a bad acid trip knows that the awful stuff will wear off, but when you're in the middle of it, it can seem deceptively permanent. While I love Chaplin's rejection of the hopelessness meme, I also think that considering the vastness of that mystery we call "life," hopelessness is a temporary state which passes itself off as a permanent state. Don't fall for it. And don't surrender your right to pursue happiness. As it is, there are plenty of people who devote their lives to making others unhappy, and they take delight in undermining our natural right to pursue happiness. By any reasonable standard, that is simply unfair. I mean, I'm all for the right to pursue happiness, but people who find happiness by making others unhappy are really screwed up in the head, and it seems to me that fighting them whenever possible increases the overall happiness quotient. Who knows? It might even induce occasional feelings of personal happiness. posted by Eric on 04.28.09 at 10:42 AM
Comments
Portia... you and Eric are both assuming a somewhat normal mental health, which certainly does not preclude despair. I suspect that among those who commit suicide there are few who are rational... and that, I think, is the difference. If you are desperate, are you necessarily rational? One can be both, but there's no guarantee they will occur simultaneously. While I appreciate -- from the standpoint of one who has contemplated suicide -- the poetic beauty of fighting for happiness for oneself... that takes the realization that the well-being (and hopefully happiness of another) can be greatly influenced by your happiness and survival being important to someone else -- whose happiness and survival is important to you. Happiness does not happen in a void. A selfish person can use the threat of suicide for personal gain (monetary and otherwise) and that is why the threat of suicide is a very selfish thing. In reality, one who threatens suicide is a manipulator. Actual suicide... I dunno. I can think of arguments that it is always selfish and, perhaps, arguments that it is not. In a way, our society that keeps track of every mistake one has ever made with no way of erasing them might contribute to suicides. Your credit rating follows you forever, your resume follows you forever, and if you are very unfortunate, your criminal file also. You might rehabilitate yourself, but will society ever recognize that you have? Rigidity and an institutional reluctance to forgive is a societal problem that neither the political left or right wants to address. I fear it's only going to worsen. Donna B. · April 29, 2009 02:51 AM Rigidity and an institutional reluctance to forgive is a societal problem that neither the political left or right wants to address. I fear it's only going to worsen. How true. And unfortunately, that includes a reluctance to forgive those would-be suicides who seek help, who find themselves haunted by permanent medical records which can cause them to lose their Second Amendment rights, preclude them from running for political office or landing super-achiever type jobs of any sort. (Anyone who believes in "confidentiality" of mental health records is a fool.) Whether truly free and independent individuals should care about such social consequences is certainly worth debating, but there's no denying their existence. Eric Scheie · April 29, 2009 08:01 AM Donna, I see your point. And "the most selfish act" always seemed too... snap for me. Actually I think I was reacting to JUSTIFICATIONS for suicide and harangues on how to prevent it. You know "too many teens commit suicide. We should ensure they have..." And Eric, health records true or otherwise mental or not, will follow you the rest of your life. And if your doctor was an ass and misdiagnosed you as an hypocondriac, you might have trouble convincing next doctor you're not. (I have been there because of very weird reactions. Took being with a family doctor for ten years before he went "wait a minute, she only comes in when something is REALLY wrong." Then he realized anotation on hospital file was someone who couldn't figure out problem and decided it was all in my mind. Then he stopped assuming everytime I came in I was 'imagining' it and started doing tests. But... ten years.) One reason I'm against thoese electronic files that supposedly will make health care SO MUCH cheaper. Portia · April 29, 2009 01:41 PM Portia, you could not be more correct about medical records. Eric, you could not be more correct about their supposed confidentiality.
Donna B. · April 30, 2009 12:39 AM |
|
June 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2009
May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
It's An Absolute Disgrace
The Seeds Of Stupidity Remember D-Day Newton's Cradle Taxes Send Jobs Offshore The law is the law! A teaching moment? You Can't Do It At Random In debt to Islam? For Western thought? David Carradine Is Dead
Links
Site Credits
|
|
In the middle of what seemed like a completely hopeless period of my life -- with limited funds and lousy health, no less -- I found happiness in taking walks, in pback novels bought for less than a dollar, in a book with reproductions of Leonardo Da Vinci's work which was more expensive, but "lasted" longer. I truly didn't expect things to get better ever, but those were enough to hold on for, even when I thought I was an encumbrance on my family. Years later, in the hospital, in ICU, when they'd told me there was no way out and I was going to die (one reason not to have National Health. I fired those doctors and got others)I found what I missed were not the expensive vacations, the great parties, the nice shopping trips... all the other things you normally think of as "making life fun." What I missed was Saturday morning walks with my husband and kids. Late night talks with a friend over a cup of tea or a glass of wine. Falling asleep with a pet cuddling next to me. A cup of coffee slowly sipped while watching the sun come up. IOW things that can be enjoyed by almost anyone, in almost any health and any financial state short of famine.
I'm not saying this to sound sanctimonious. I'm saying it because it surprised me. As someone who is used to striving and doing the best she can and always aiming for more, I was shocked I could be satisfied with so little. Oh, I still want more -- greedy capitalist and all -- but if all else fails, I know what's enough. Not only does this make suicide less likely, it's helping me be relatively calm at the prospect of things like losing our jobs. "Okay, if this happens, what's the next best step?" And I know ultimately what we REQUIRE is not that much. And we can always try for more again.