|
January 02, 2009
Hsu Obama
It looks like Norman Hsu not only backed Hillary he also backed the Most Corrupt President Elect Ever™. Gateway Pundit quotes from The Smoking Gun: Before becoming a key fundraiser for Hillary Clinton's presidential bid, Hsu co-hosted a 2005 California fundraiser for Obama's political action committee and introduced the Illinois Democrat to Marc Gorenberg, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist who later joined the Obama campaign's national finance committee. Prosecutors allege that Hsu directed his investors to donate money to specific candidates, and then reimbursed them in violation of federal campaign laws.No wonder Hillary and Barry are thick as thieves. It appears that they have at least one thief in common. I wonder how friendly Obama was with Roland Burris? It seems that Most Corrupt President Elect Ever™ was a Burris supporter at least while he had a chance to win the election for Illinois Governor in 2002. The Washington Post, Dec. 12, 2008: "Obama and Blagojevich rarely interacted until Blagojevich ran for governor. Obama told his friends in Springfield that he was unimpressed by Blagojevich's resume, and he tried to lobby his friend Durbin to enter the race before deciding to support Roland Burris in the Democratic primary.And what does Burris have to do with Hsu? Nothing so far. But I'm keeping my eyes peeled. Given the way politics works in the Democrat party a connection is likely to turn up sooner or later. The American people thought they were electing the first Black American President. And they were. Unfortunately no one told them he was a circus clown. And what is the purpose of a circus clown? Distraction. In other words: hold on to your wallet. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 01.02.09 at 02:18 AM
Comments
Tony Rezko. Bent Rod Blago. Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Penny Pritzker. And now Norman Hsu. Did I mention 20 years in Chicago politics? But yeah. You are right. It is unsupportable. The man is as pure as driven snow. M. Simon · January 3, 2009 12:53 AM I didn't say he was pure. I don't think he's pure. I doubt that anybody who reaches this level in American politics is pure. Your rhetoric ("most corrupt") is over the top, and is unsupported by anything except innuendo. AemJeff · January 3, 2009 04:37 AM Degrees of corruption are always partly a judgement call, I don't think there are any hard and fast rules to determine where exactly someone fits on a corruption scale. Is Obama more corrupt than, say Nixon? That would at least partly be in the eye of the beholder. Much of his past associations and the area (Chicago) where he spent his formative political years certainly do give reasons for disquiet, however. Joe Lammers · January 3, 2009 09:54 AM Much of his past associations and the area (Chicago) where he spent his formative political years certainly do give reasons for disquiet, however. Illustrating my point. Conclusions are drawn from weak, inferential evidence and then asserted as fact, often in in the strongest possible terms. If somebody has something substantial, then show us what you've got. Otherwise what's the point, except to smear? AemJeff · January 3, 2009 10:13 AM Illustrating my point. Conclusions are drawn from weak, inferential evidence and then asserted as fact, often in in the strongest possible terms. If somebody has something substantial, then show us what you've got. Otherwise what's the point, except to smear? The Tony Rezko Hyde Park house deal. As to the Most Corrupt President Elect Ever™. I don't recall a President elect ever having been involved in a number of corruption scandals. Usually they have to be in office for a while. M. Simon · January 3, 2009 10:21 AM This is what you consider prima facie evidence of corruption? (Most Corrupt!) That he dealt with Rezko at all was obviously not particularly brght, but this is an example of what I've already described: a weak, inferential case that doesn't merit your description. AemJeff · January 3, 2009 12:43 PM The comment system ate my link. I was trying to point to the following article on the Sun-Times site: http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/124171,CST-NWS-obama05.article AemJeff · January 3, 2009 01:03 PM Jeff, Of course it was a mistake. The mistake grew out of Obama's long association with convicted political fixer Rezko. The question now is: what other "mistakes" are we ignorant of? Rezko is singing like a canary. Perhaps we will find out in time what those other "mistakes" were. M. Simon · January 3, 2009 02:11 PM Jeff, Your link was improperly formatted - you left out the quote mark in href=" and after the url I fixed it for you. M. Simon · January 3, 2009 02:14 PM Thanks for fixing the link. I agree, btw. Rezko's going to talk. When we get the details, who knows what we'll find out. AemJeff · January 3, 2009 02:23 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2009
December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Running On Hungry
Hsu Obama A Crypto Problem Happy New Year Too! HAPPY NEW YEAR! Science Toys - 1 An Agent For Change Bent Burris For The Illinois Senate Under The Influence The Ruins Of Detroit
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Most Corrupt...
Partisan blogging at its best. Wildly sensational, unsupportable accusations uttered for no apparent reason except the hope that they might somehow stick.
Jeeze.