Privatizing Big Brother?

Here's something for libertarians and privacy lovers to chew on.

A guy living in San Francisco's sleazy Tenderloin District got so fed up with the crime outside his apartment window that he installed a live webcam with a dedicated web site. Now that the entire world can witness crimes in his 'hood, they're calling the SFPD:


Jackson, 22, moved to the city in June from a small beach town in Florida and quickly discovered the realities of San Francisco real estate. Prices were so high that he said he "jumped on the first place I found."

It turned out to be on Taylor Street, just across from Glide Memorial Church. It's an ideal location - for watching crack deals, late-night violence and random crazy behavior.

"By the third night I was basically fed up with the crime and noise," Jackson said. "I didn't really have a plan. I just put the Webcam up, my girlfriend made a little Web page to display it, and here we are."

If you haven't checked out adamsblock.com, you are missing one of the greatest at-work time-killers ever to pop up on your monitor. There are two cameras, both on 24 hours a day, and a real-time chat room that crackles with activity. And no wonder - there is always something to talk about.

Jackson's camera has caught a man throwing himself into the side of a bus, apparently hoping to work an injury scam. It didn't work. The bus didn't stop. Viewers have also watched fights, car chases and break-ins.

If it sounds like an idea that might attract a crowd, you're right. After clips were posted on YouTube, the original group of 50 viewers grew to more than 500,000.

A dot-com company gave Jackson a high-resolution camera and Lefty O'Doul's, the nearby restaurant, chipped in for a microphone. Jackson got the new camera Monday and started the improved site Tuesday.

The results have been pretty dramatic. In three days, adamsblock.com has had 80,000 views and 25,000 visitors, a remarkable 40 percent of whom live outside the United States. On Friday, a woman from the United Kingdom joined the regulars in competing to see who could be first to identify the number stamped on the trunk of taxis that drive by.

"At any given time," Jackson said, "there is an average of over 100 people in the chat room."

And some of the vistors are calling 911 to report crimes:
...With people watching at all hours of the day and night, some of them have watched crimes taking place. Viewers picked up the phone and called 911, and the police arrived in no time flat.
Criminals have been fleeing to other neighborhoods to avoid the private camera, and a police spokesman notes that they are more effective than the government cameras. So the idea is spreading:
Jackson knows how effective the private cameras can be. Late one night when three characters stood on his sidewalk yelling, "We're going to shoot you," Jackson knew he was on to something.

Now Jackson, who said his day job is as a social media consultant, is eager to take this to the next level. He says if interested people in high-crime areas e-mail him ( adam@dailytechtalk.com), he will help set up a camera. He only asks that the new sites split any advertising revenue with him. Jackson envisions a network of cameras, tied together through a single Web site, so viewers can keep an eye on the streets at all hours.

Of course, that was the original idea behind the city's cameras. The problem is that they've become so entangled in red tape that they are rarely effective. Private operators, like Jackson, may be a real alternative.

As someone who fears big government, I like the idea of privatizing privacy concerns. Not only can you sue a private camera operator for genuine invasions of privacy, but they're not cops, so they can't make misdemeanor arrests or issue tickets for things like speeding, littering, or other infractions. However, big shot celebrity types who think they can go slumming around doing whatever they want might need to think again. These private operators can sell pictures to tabloids.

The downside is that technology leads inexorably to a loss of privacy everywhere, and basically universal surveillance. (As Arianna Huffington and Don Fowler learned, someone is always watching.)

Whether that's a downside would depend on who's doing what while who's watching.

And whether more people care about the watchers, or about the watched.

posted by Eric on 12.07.08 at 01:43 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/7760






Comments

Ubiquitous cameras connected to YouTube will force us to act responsibly, or face the harsh condemnation of our peers. It is as if the all-seeing eye of God were watching. It is the Second Coming.

A Fart in the Wind   ·  December 7, 2008 06:16 PM

Mrs. Kravitz comes to the web. ;-)

Darleen   ·  December 7, 2008 06:42 PM

I couldn't get away with anything in the small town I grew up in because somebody would see me and tell my mom.

Or complement my dad on what a good driver I was when not only was I not supposed to have taken the car, I didn't even have a driver's license.

With only six degrees of separation, somebody's going to see that youtube video of you acting up and tell your mom and dad.


Donna B.   ·  December 7, 2008 06:42 PM

I lived on an army post until I was thirteen, and people were always reporting my misbehavior to my parents. So lack of privacy is bad - my brothers and I are raging paranoids who think everyone is out to get us - but it's good, because it seems to lead to better behavior - we're very well-spoken and well-behaved paranoids, mostly because everyone actually is out to get us. Is this a good trade-off? Or is it different if private citizens are doing it instead of the government?

Elena   ·  December 7, 2008 11:26 PM

It is different if private citizens are doing it. Government control is too arbitrary, where citizens may forgive you.

Donna B.   ·  December 8, 2008 01:12 AM

I'm not sure how you can cite "invasion of privacy" when someone watches you carrying on in a public street.

Heather   ·  December 8, 2008 02:07 PM

Elena, my step-daughter also grew up in the military and had the exact same complaint. It sounds like it functions very much like a small town.

Donna B.   ·  December 9, 2008 04:58 AM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits