|
September 24, 2008
the coverup of the coverup of the coverup
The biggest story of the campaign is that a man running for president was not only a close associate, but was quite possibly even a protege of an unrepentant terrorist. It's huge, rapidly unfolding news, but aside from yesterday's WSJ article, it's still not news to most voters, and I think it's obvious that the MSM want to keep it that way. They're more concerned with investigating the intricacies of an obscure Alaska bridge that wasn't built. The Corner's Peter Kirsanow summarizes the latest: Stanley Kurtz's piece today describing what appears to be an attempt to cover-up the extent of Sen. Obama's ties to William Ayers should have journalists salivating. This is a big story that, so far, the press seems determined to avoid.Via Glenn Reynolds, who adds, "And yet, they avert their eyes." They have to. The mere possibility that Obama could be a protege of an unrepentant terrorist is immensely damaging, which is why it has to be covered up by Obama, and why the coverup itself has to be covered up by the MSM. If the voters learn about this, and have time to learn about who Ayers is, they will not want to elect Obama president. The longer it goes unreported, and questions are not asked, the better the chances that the voters will never know. As to the swarms of reporters who have investigated every facet of Sarah Palin's life, they have done their damnedest to make her minuscule association with the Alaskan Independence Party a major campaign issue, but where it comes to an unrepentant terrorist having a close relationship with a presidential candidate, and who might even have been the guy's mentor, they don't consider it even worth a look. ...What did Ayers see in (or hear from) Obama that caused the former to take such an interest in him?I don't know which is a bigger story: the close association, Obama's coverup of the association, or the media blackout. Considering the latest, I think the near total failure of reporting it is a huge story in itself. I said "near total," because a few journalists like Michael Barone of US News are behaving conscientiously. And the Washington Times's Inside Politics section ran a column titled NEWS BLACKOUT which quotes from this Newsbusters piece: "The association between Obama and Ayers has received virtually no attention from the three broadcast networks, with the conspicuous exception of a primary-season debate sponsored by ABC when George Stephanopoulos asked Obama about his relationship with Ayers. Out of 1,365 broadcast evening news stories about Obama prior to the end of the primaries, only two mentioned Ayers - one a brief mention of the debate question on the April 17 'Nightly News,' and the other an April 20 'World News Sunday' story about [John] McCain raising the Ayers issue on 'This Week.'(I guess it would be unreasonable of me to expect the MSM to report on their own non-reporting, wouldn't it?) Read Stanley Kurtz's full report here. More background here. That a story of this magnitude is being ignored, involving as it does a man poised to be elected president, is nothing less than shocking. Whether it's surprising is beside the point. There's only one way to get them to stop ignoring it, and that's to make noise. MORE: Clarice Feldman looks at the close working relationship between Obama and Ayers, and asks some good questions: How is it possible that Obama in writing two autobiographies could ignore his 13 year-long association with Ayers if he were not purposely trying to hide or downplay it? How is it possible that the media could continue to ignore the CAC story? How is it possible that American voters, who regularly indicate such enormous concern over educational issues, could be so long kept in the dark by the Fourth Estate about the educational project Obama ran into the ground while he aided his revolutionary pals in recruiting Chicago kids to their extreme left wing mission?(Via Glenn Reynolds.) posted by Eric on 09.24.08 at 10:54 PM
Comments
Re: RH - I warned you Eric. And now ∅ is rising in the polls FWIW. RH - Eric and I had this long running e-mail discussion in the primary season and I was saying that at least Clinton loved America. So I take your words as vindication. BTW thanks for hitting this Eric. ∅ is a gift that keeps on giving. If the 527s work this issue hard it may be possible despite vote fraud to keep him out of the White House. M. Simon · September 24, 2008 11:59 PM While I can't stand Hillary, my support for Obama over Hillary was also strategic. I believed then (and now) that Hillary would have beaten McCain easily, but against Obama he stands at least a chance. Eric Scheie · September 25, 2008 12:19 AM I agree with you, Rhodium. As I realized back about March or April, Obama had managed to do what I thought was impossible. He made Hillary seem very likeable in comparison. If it were Hillary vs. McCain and Hillary were leading in the polls, I wouldn't be as worried as I am with the prospect of an Obama Presidency. Hillary might be a closet socialist, but she's also enough of a pragmatist to know that she could only do so much because she'll never be very popular with half of the country. Kurt · September 25, 2008 12:55 AM I don't think that Obama shares Ayers' terrorist ideas. I do think he shares his educational ideas. That's enough. Assistant Village Idiot · September 25, 2008 10:16 AM You dumbasses believe this shit. Wow he was associated when he was a kid. Who gives a shit. Palin was associated with the Secessionist Party of Alaska via her husband. Stop the smear campaign you dipshits. You know McCain can't beat Obama in a clean campaign. XD · October 5, 2008 07:09 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The definition of "racism" changes to fit the Times
Twiddling with winks Lawyers Without Licenses Obama: Disciple Of Satan Lovely Friends You Have Senator Above and beyond the crossed paths Obama's Real Father? Whose Sock Puppet Is Obama? What's the problem here? Why is this so hard? bonified rednex is real kyewl!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Ayers is not only an admitted terrorist, but an admitted communist. And, no, I'm not using communist the same way any lefty accuses anyone to the right of Michael Bloomberg of being a "nazi." Ayers described himself as a "small c communist."
This makes me sick to think that I ever thought Hillary Clinton was the worst person the Dems could put up. Now, I pray that the Clintons retake control of the Democrat party.