|
|
|
January 31, 2008
Testing my limits
A comment Glenn Reynolds made the other day reminded me that everyone has their limit: Bill Quick begs to differ. Hey, for everybody there's a point at which they'd rather take their marbles and go home. For me it would be Huckabee. For some Democrats it was Gore in 2000 and they voted Nader instead. For some Republicans it was GHW Bush in 1992 and they voted Perot.This reminded me of a discussion in an earlier post's comments between me and Bill Quick, in which he asked me how I would feel about Romney had he hired Goebbels as an advisor. While Goebbels is of course an extreme hypothetical, these are good questions. And lest anyone get the misimpression that I don't have my limit, I do. I'm tempted to say it's Alan Keyes, who, by running against Barack Obama, caused me to support the latter in the Senate race (in a fit of pique, I even purchased RepublicansforObama.com and let it lapse). If the GOP somehow selected Keyes as the nominee, the truth is that I simply, absolutely, could not vote for him. (No, I would not vote for Hillary, but I might very well think about leaving the country to avoid the coming civil war.) But Keyes isn't my only limit; Pat Buchanan would probably do it for me to. And so would David Duke (who ran in the 1992 GOP primary, believe it or not). So, I have my limits, and I think everyone does. I'd be a hypocrite not to understand the refusal of people to vote for McCain if the man so violates their sense of principles, and I'd be the last to demand that anyone pull the lever in such a way as to violate his sense of conscience. But just because I understand, that does not mean I agree. And just because I disagree does not mean I am being condescending. MORE: In the first sentence, I should have said that "everyone has his limit," which would be grammatically correct. But that's so politically incorrect that the standard usage in ordinary conversation has changed. It's now politically correct to be grammatically incorrect. (And I should probably say "incorrect grammatically," but some things carry the Culture War too far....) posted by Eric on 01.31.08 at 11:33 AM
Comments
And just because I disagree does not mean I am being condescending.No, of course not. But then, you don't take an explicitly condescending tone or approach. The bone I pick is with those who act as if we who take a stand on principle are "not calm," or "not rational," or "stupid," or all the other ad hominems that seek to strip us of the very faculties we use to discover and support the principles on which we make our stands. I am quite disgusted with The Anchoress, for instance, because the tone of her postings lately has taken on the schoolmarmish, as if we who won't vote for McCain (or Huckabee) for a host of perfectly good reasons are like unruly schoolchildren who need to calm down, grow up, and take our McCain medicine like good little boys and girls. I've challenged her to take a similar attitude to her principled stand on abortion, but somehow, I think she will miraculously find her principles much more adult, rational, and calm than ours. Bill Quick · January 31, 2008 12:13 PM I think I am also disgusted with the unearned sense of entitlement machine Republicans seem to think they have to conservative or libertarian votes. That "lesser of two evils," "where you gonna go" argument is precisely the one that has kept the Democratic ethnic plantations chained to that party with ever shrinking influence for decades. It was most perfectly summed up by an especially egregious statement from Pat Ruffini: None of this is to diminish John McCain as a true patriot. No matter who wins, we must quickly get behind the winner.Must we? Really? I don't think so. Bill Quick · January 31, 2008 12:17 PM Whose to say that Huckabee or McCain wouldn't be the president we need? Anyone can give a good speech. Anyone can slam their opponent and make them look and sound like a fool or flake. Can one of the candidates convince and prove, to all of the voters or at least, a majority of the voters, that the other candidates are liars and manipulators? Rena · January 31, 2008 1:45 PM My rule is this: If I wouldn't have you as a dinner guest, I won't have you as a public official. As you might have guessed, I don't vote a lot. Francis W. Porretto · January 31, 2008 5:04 PM If I wouldn't have you as a dinner guest, I won't have you as a public official. Oh, but you will. And have, most likely. Slartibartfast · February 1, 2008 4:26 PM ...meaning, sorry for the lack of precision, you'll have people as public officials that you wouldn't have as dinner guests, whether you vote for them or not. Slartibartfast · February 1, 2008 4:35 PM Post a comment |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time
• People Are Not Rational • No Biorobots For Japan • The Thorium Solution • Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera • Voter Fraud? • This war of attrition is driving me bananas! • Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? • Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression? • Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood
Links
Site Credits
|
|
W. was my limit.
How nice to have the paleocons back in charge of the Republican Party.
I almost feel sorry for the neocon deadenders.
Almost...