October 31, 2007
HAPPY HALLOWEEN! (Especially for prudes....)
I never get any trick-or-treaters, but I always carve a jack-o-lantern anyway. Here's this year's:
I can't help notice that there have been a lot of complaints about girls wearing slutty outfits like these, but because no one ever comes to the house, I have no way of evaluating slutty costume statistics.
Witches are "wayward" and grammar-school pirates are "wenches." A girl isn't an Army cadet, she's a "Major Flirt," and who knew female firefighters wore fishnet stockings? Even Little Bo Peep comes with a corset, short skirt and lacy petticoat.To which Lileks responds,
I kvetched about this a few years ago in my print incarnation, but for some odd reason one lone column did not stop the marketing juggernaut. I'll have to look into that.My advice is to start an alternative juggernaut. Why not try marketing deliberately prudish costumes as an alternative?
I'm wondering, is such a thing possible?
As to what they would look like, I don't know. Earlier Glenn said he was "OK on slutty," although not for nine year olds, but would anyone say they're "OK on prudish"? Do today's kids even know what the word "prude" means?
What would a prude wear, anyway? Does anyone know?
First, let's settle the nagging question of what is a prude -- at least, from the standpoint of a clueless girl:
Dear Alice,Huh? That means all the kids who are worrying about being cool and fitting in are prudes? That can't be right.
But there's more:
The term is often used to judge someone as sexually conservative and no fun.Does that mean rape victims are prudes? Lesbians who rebuff heterosexual men? Gay men who refuse to have sex with women? This prudishness sounds more exciting than I thought.
So what exactly would a girl who wanted to go out as a prude for Halloween wear, anyway?
I found a goofy online "Are you a prude?" test which had a couple of images:
Well, that looks downright Victorian to me. And while the Victorians were known for being prudish, today that look is considered "Gothic" -- and therefore cool and trendy!
At least as trendy as the "elegant Gothic Lolita" look:
And that's perverted right?
So it wouldn't do for a youngster who's trying for the prude look.
The test site also has this schoolgirl uniform:
I guess that's prudish, but I see a problem right away with the prudishly strict school uniform thing. While the schoolgirl uniforms might be intended to be prudish, it's a well known fact that perverts in Japan (and probably here) get turned on by them.
Which leads this sort of thing to be marketed:
It's so slutty and disgusting that it ought to be illegal, right?
Which is obviously why it's being marketed as a Halloween costume. But the problem is, it derives from prude wear!
If yesterday's prude look becomes today's slutty look, I see no way for parents to win.
I truly apologize for the fact that this became waaaay perverted.
To think that I imagined I could write a modest proposal for prudish Halloween uniforms!
I should probably stay the hell away from fashion and stick to pumpkins.
posted by Eric on 10.31.07 at 08:17 PM
Search the Site
Classics To Go
See more archives here
Old (Blogspot) archives
A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time
People Are Not Rational
No Biorobots For Japan
The Thorium Solution
Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera
This war of attrition is driving me bananas!
Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry?
Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression?
Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood