![]() |
|
![]()
October 31, 2007
HAPPY HALLOWEEN! (Especially for prudes....)
I never get any trick-or-treaters, but I always carve a jack-o-lantern anyway. Here's this year's: I can't help notice that there have been a lot of complaints about girls wearing slutty outfits like these, but because no one ever comes to the house, I have no way of evaluating slutty costume statistics. For some background, Glenn Reynolds links James Lileks who quotes from Newsweek: Witches are "wayward" and grammar-school pirates are "wenches." A girl isn't an Army cadet, she's a "Major Flirt," and who knew female firefighters wore fishnet stockings? Even Little Bo Peep comes with a corset, short skirt and lacy petticoat.To which Lileks responds, I kvetched about this a few years ago in my print incarnation, but for some odd reason one lone column did not stop the marketing juggernaut. I'll have to look into that.My advice is to start an alternative juggernaut. Why not try marketing deliberately prudish costumes as an alternative? I'm wondering, is such a thing possible? As to what they would look like, I don't know. Earlier Glenn said he was "OK on slutty," although not for nine year olds, but would anyone say they're "OK on prudish"? Do today's kids even know what the word "prude" means? What would a prude wear, anyway? Does anyone know? First, let's settle the nagging question of what is a prude -- at least, from the standpoint of a clueless girl: Dear Alice,Huh? That means all the kids who are worrying about being cool and fitting in are prudes? That can't be right. But there's more: The term is often used to judge someone as sexually conservative and no fun.Does that mean rape victims are prudes? Lesbians who rebuff heterosexual men? Gay men who refuse to have sex with women? This prudishness sounds more exciting than I thought. So what exactly would a girl who wanted to go out as a prude for Halloween wear, anyway? I found a goofy online "Are you a prude?" test which had a couple of images: Well, that looks downright Victorian to me. And while the Victorians were known for being prudish, today that look is considered "Gothic" -- and therefore cool and trendy! At least as trendy as the "elegant Gothic Lolita" look: And that's perverted right? So it wouldn't do for a youngster who's trying for the prude look. The test site also has this schoolgirl uniform: I guess that's prudish, but I see a problem right away with the prudishly strict school uniform thing. While the schoolgirl uniforms might be intended to be prudish, it's a well known fact that perverts in Japan (and probably here) get turned on by them. Which leads this sort of thing to be marketed: It's so slutty and disgusting that it ought to be illegal, right? Which is obviously why it's being marketed as a Halloween costume. But the problem is, it derives from prude wear! If yesterday's prude look becomes today's slutty look, I see no way for parents to win. I truly apologize for the fact that this became waaaay perverted. To think that I imagined I could write a modest proposal for prudish Halloween uniforms! I should probably stay the hell away from fashion and stick to pumpkins. posted by Eric on 10.31.07 at 08:17 PM
Comments
You may want to know the latest updates on the Israeli Sex Weapons of Zionist Aggresion Against Pious Muslim Males. http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/israeli-defense-force-elite-female-stripper-death-squads/ Scott · November 1, 2007 4:06 AM Burqa. PC and scary and prudish all at the same time. And the anti-costume PC crowd will be afraid to complain. In a lighter vein, how about a Miko's garb? LarryD · November 1, 2007 1:47 PM Post a comment |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time
People Are Not Rational No Biorobots For Japan The Thorium Solution Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera Voter Fraud? This war of attrition is driving me bananas! Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression? Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Pump Kins?
I can say no more.