|
June 18, 2007
Who will promise to imprison the largest number of women for abortion?
According to Newsmax.com, Fred Thompson's abortion record is being scrutinized: Combing through Thompson's archive, Newsweek found several files on his campaign strategy on abortion that could roil his 2008 bid. On a 1994 Eagle Forum survey, Thompson said he opposed criminalizing abortion. Two years later, on a Christian Coalition questionnaire, he checked "opposed" to a proposed constitutional amendment protecting the sanctity of human life. In a campaign policy statement filed in the archives, he also said he believes "the decision to have an early term abortion is a moral issue and should not be a legal one subject to the dictates of the government." During an interview with the Conservative Spectator, a Tennessee newspaper, he claimed to be pro-life but also said that, "The ultimate decision on abortion should be left with the woman and not the government."The Tennessean has more, and while Thompson's statements to various organizations and media outlets have varied over the years, his overall voting record indicates he's philosophically opposed to abortion. (A federalist, he thinks Roe v. Wade was wrong, and voted repeatedly to ban partial birth abortion.) But I guess to certain ideologues, you have to want to put women in prison or else you'll be labeled "pro abortion." Voters who think abortion should always be illegal (I assume that means they want to put women in prison, but I can't be sure that they've all thought it through) were 16% of the 2004 electorate, and 12% of Bush's voters. I think if they compare Thompson's record to Clinton's or Obama's, they'll vote for Thompson if he's the candidate in the general election. I don't know where people get the idea that the president can do much about abortion one way or another, but it certainly fuels a lot of passion. posted by Eric on 06.18.07 at 06:56 PM
Comments
I don't necessarily want to put women in prison, but prison is where we put those who murder others, whether they're women or not. Are you implying that you don't think we should put murderers in prison? John S. · June 19, 2007 07:32 PM Murder is the malicious and unlawful killing of one human being by another. What is a human being? The answer may be clear to you, but not everyone sees it the same way. IMO, a human being has human attributes, especially a brain. I don't think a fertilized egg is any more a human being than a seed is a tree. Before Roe v. Wade, the individual states determined when and whether terminating a fetus's life was illegal, but it was not treated as murder. Eric Scheie · June 19, 2007 07:54 PM I understand your position... my comment was phrased that way in part because I believed your remark about wanting to put women in prison oversimplifies the objections of most of the anti-abortion crowd. Although there are admittedly some who seek political power and even profit from the abortion issue, the vast majority of us who oppose abortion do so out of a genuine, principled belief in the humanity of the fetus. I probably resorted to snarkiness reflexively, out of the habit of having to constantly defend my motives to people who automatically assumed the worst about my views. Sorry! John S. · June 20, 2007 12:15 AM By the way, I would like to cordially contest your analogy with the seed/tree. It is true that a seed is not a tree. However if "seed" is analogous to "fetus", then "tree" is not analogous to "human, but rather to "adult". "Human" would be more analogous to, say, "redwood". Just as the seed and the tree, although they look different, are both truly redwoods, both the fetus and the adult are still truly human. John S. · June 20, 2007 12:24 AM Thanks, and I see your point, but I don't think a fertilized egg is a fetus. It's like a seed, and like a seed it can have an awfully long shelf life unless and until it is implanted. Many of the hundreds of thousand eggs in labs are now voting age if they're people. I'll never be able to conceptualize of an egg as a human being, and I don't think most people will. (Sure, it's human, but it could become two or more humans, or none.) A fertility specialist told me that about half of all fertilized eggs don't make it to the implantation stage. If they all had souls, then according to a certain cruel logic that would make Nature the biggest abortionist of them all. (I'm skeptical that a soul can exist in the absence of a brain, as I think brainless = soulless.) Is cracking open a fertile egg the same thing as killing a chicken? I don't think so. They are different things. Eric Scheie · June 20, 2007 06:45 PM Suicide's illegal. Yet strangely, we don't put people in prison for it. Instead, we prevent them from committing suicide and give them counseling. If they insist on trying to hurt themselves, we put them in a mental health facility until the urge passes, and teach them how not to get so desperate. Since it's pretty clear that many women abort out of coercion by their boyfriends or parents, a nice safe shelter is pretty much what they need. For many others, it does seem to be purposefully hurting themselves. So again, the mental health method seems to be the best model. For those few for whom it's a real economic problem, a facility to feed and house them, provide pre-natal care, and assist them in finding adoptive parents for the child, would seem to be a good idea. Fortunately, pro-life groups have made out-patient pregnancy centers and counselors pretty common in the US. They are ready to help women who are ready to accept help. Maureen · June 22, 2007 07:36 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2007
May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Manufacturing Concensus
Rethinking the First Amendment since 1998. Experience counts! The Kids Are Alright! this time, let's put environmentalists in charge of the economy! Blogger to undergo counseling? overprotecting the underprotected yesterday's goners don't stop Mobbing in Milwaukee Calling Dr. Freud! Real men need real lies, not fake lies!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I consider myself to be pretty anti-abortion. If I thought it would help, I would support putting women who get abortions in jail, right alonside their doctors (but I don't think it would help and so oppose it on tactical grounds).
But because I recognize SOME of the usual exceptions (rape and life of mother, but not necessarily incest), I am usually counted as pro-abortion. Makes no sense to me, but that's the way it is.