|
June 15, 2007
A sign of the times
If this isn't considered proof positive of the anthropogenic global warming/scientific alarmist consensus, I don't know what is! The above picture was taken yesterday, and, skeptic that I am, I have to admit that things are worse than the sign ever anticipated. The ice isn't just thin; it no longer exists. As you can clearly see, the ice has melted away. To nothing except bare water (and very dangerous water at that). What this means is that I can't keep up my skating-on-thin-ice act forever. Sooner or later, I'll have to admit it's gotten warmer, and then I'll have to go from pretending to skate on thin ice to pretending to walk on water, or whatever one does in a meltdown. posted by Eric on 06.15.07 at 05:38 PM
Comments
Looks like a clear sign of increased solar output to me. Although the trees look particularly healthy. Papertiger · June 16, 2007 12:02 AM Neal: while I can't speak with complete confidence, a sophisticated computer simulation run on the text of this weblog rates it very likely that Eric is making fun of you, personally. Michael Brazier · June 16, 2007 06:59 PM Me I just write blog! I not make fun of anybody! Eric Scheie · June 16, 2007 07:28 PM Michael Brazier: Hence you note the rather tentative phrasing of my response. It's not characteristic of my normal writing. Neal J. King · June 16, 2007 10:27 PM But in any event, it doesn't matter. I'm not writing to convince Eric. Neal J. King · June 16, 2007 10:30 PM Basic incompatibility in philosophy. I don't see anthropogenic global warming theory as a scientific argument, but as a threat to freedom. Eric Scheie · June 17, 2007 12:58 AM Eric, There are two completely separate issues: a) Is global warming happening? and why? b) What should human beings do about it? Part a) is ultimately a scientific question. Coming to terms with it is something that should be influenced by no political philosophy or preference - socialist, fascist, pro-libertarian, free-market - none of this has anything to do with the scientific questions and issues. Part b) is a policy and political-economic issue. All philosophies and preferences can come into play here: political philosophy, religious philosophy, economic preferences, etc. But just as the answer to part a) does not dictate the answer to part b), the issues of part b) absolutely should not be brought into part a): all that does is muddy the waters. Neal J. King · June 17, 2007 07:30 AM Neal, Bloggers aint supposed to have a sense of humor? Or was that your inner Sidney talking? Alan Kellogg · June 17, 2007 08:58 AM "That coyote would be dead by now..." J. Case · June 17, 2007 06:16 PM Alan Kellog & J. Case: My comment immediately above was to Eric's: That doesn't sound particularly humorous in intent; nor do I see any sign of a roadrunner. Neal J. King · June 18, 2007 02:42 AM Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! dbklxjmitfrsec twclnmzvvj · June 18, 2007 08:40 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2007
May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Another Attempt At Friendly Discourse Goes Awry
Educated Incapacity Slow Motion Singularity: 1968 Victorian Wisdom: 1934 Boron Fusion Rocketry: 1977 Bicentennial Transhumanism: 1976 as the noose tightens, the hangman becomes respectable hot times in Kuwait Eunuchly American literary figure(s) Thinking globally, acting locally.
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Eric,
Please clarify the nature of the sign:
- How recent an addition is this?
- The month is June: Is there some reason that this is being posted? Is there normally ice in June?