|
|
|
|
March 22, 2007
replacing tradition with tradition
Via Pajamas Media, I saw this Times article about a coming change in television advertising. The goal is to keep people watching instead of reaching for the remote or charging off to the kitchen. Remarkably, they're considering bringing back an old idea from the 1950s -- integrating advertising content with the show and/or its characters: In the so-called golden age of television, when shows did not make it on the air without sponsors, the commercials were often integrated into the programs. That helped keep viewers tuned in.I remember the phenomenon well. If you liked the show, and you saw the Nelson family telling you to buy a range, the Clampetts telling you to buy Kellogg's Corn Flakes, or the Cleavers telling you to buy Purina dog food, this was more persuasive than some stranger reading from a script. Unfortunately, other than dangling the hint at the end, the Times doesn't explain just how to use the "Grey's Anatomy" cast in the commercials in such a way as to keep people from running to the kitchen or hitting the remote. Obviously, this makes it my responsibility to butt in and help out. Considering that the show's fans are doubtless familiar with what's been going on, it would be a simple matter to capitalize on the "f" word choking controversy. "Hi, I'm Isaiah Washington! As many of you know, I was sent to rehab after I called my friend here a word they won't let me use on TV and then choking my colleague Dr. McDreamy. And let me tell you, rehab therapy is expensive. While I'm now completely cured of my violent homophobia, let me assure you that what happened to me could happen to anyone! That's why we're all sitting here tonight to tell you about an affordable health plan...." I'd sit and watch it. Even though I've never watched "Grey's Anatomy." posted by Eric on 03.22.07 at 11:53 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
We will do nothing, because cowardice is virtuous
Scientifically manufactured morality? Denial hits home See CO2? replacing tradition with tradition "REGARDLESS OF GLOBAL WARMING" Fusion Newsgroup Cathy Seipp, R.I.P. A Helpful Bunch No time to be an NRA attack goon today!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I remember radio commercials. Sponsors and shows were so tightly connected (Fibber McGee:Johnson's Wax,...) that the commercials were seamless parts of the show. And everybody knew it. The show would move through the commercial, and you'd keep listening.
You have to have one sponsor per show. If there are too many companies, well, let them duke it out - checkbooks at 20 paces.
For my money - which stays at home - commercials have been on a par with - usually better than - the shows. I often think that shows are there only to fill up the otherwise dead air between commercials.
Stan Freberg got his start in radio advertising. He knew how to make a funny commercial - there haven't been any like his since he left the field.