|
May 18, 2006
Now you'll know how your victims felt!
Ace links to this noxious high school "survey" which really isn't a survey at all, but an attempt to intimidate young people who haven't yet developed thick skins. Says Ace: I know they'll say they're just trying to make it easier for closeted gay teens to come out, to feel that they're not alone. But I hope they understand it does tend to look a lot like recruiting.While it might be recruiting (and I agree that it's creepy), I think it's more likely an attempt to inflict guilt by way of a lame parody of the "insensitive" questionaires allegedly used in the past. I've seen these things for years, and the one in question is a variation on this: HETEROSEXUAL QUESTIONNAIRESame thing here. It's outrageous to inflict this stuff on kids, and it's as if a bunch of gay activists are trying to punish them for the "homophobic crimes" of the 1950s. Next they'll tell them that homosexuals received electroshock therapy, as if that's their fault too. I can't prove it, but I have a hunch that the people who did this are more axe-grinding activists than recuiters: The teachers who Woelfel said are responsible for the survey - social studies teacher Sarah Olson and communications teacher Julie Grudzinski - could not be reached for comment.Frankly, the whole thing reminds me of what's going on at Duke University. Getting even for the past by reversing the roles ("you used to lynch us for touching white women, so now it's our turn"). Or make kids lie down on the floor of an imaginary slave ship. Never mind that the "reenactors" of these grotesque role reversals weren't even alive when the wrongs they want to right occurred. They'll just make clueless people pay for stuff they never did. Ah, screw it. Right now I'm too tired to write a long essay. Plus I just saw United 93, which brought back memories that never left. UPDATE: The comments posted by Ace's readers are great. I especially liked this one from "Sack of Crap": The survey I am preparing includes the following quesiton:(All students who hesitate in their answers, see me after class!) Seriously though, I wish there was some way to abolish the deliberate infliction of guilt on students who have done nothing wrong, and who are in what are supposed to be their formative years. Similar techniques have been used for years in "teaching" things like "racial sensitivity." The reason they've become so common is that most of the people who are pushing them on students -- the ones who do heavy lifting -- are not members of the groups said to be aggrieved. They are themselves members of the "guilty" class who believe fervently in their own guilt. Because this guilt dominates their thinking and cannot be contained, they become transmitters of it in a manner akin to religious guilt. Being guilty, they must do more than atone; they must make others atone. To the extent that they still harbor inner unresolved feelings of bigotry, why, the infliction of guilt upon others serves as official certification that they are bigotry-free! This is why liberals who are personally uncomfortable with homosexuality were so quick to jump on the "gay marriage" bandwagon. It certifies the supporter as "not a bigot!" (Much easier than inviting homos home to eat dinner with your family, no?) The fact that the people on the other side can be characterized as "bigots" and "homophobes" adds credibility to this certification by way of contrast. (It also does wonders for the ego to stake out with such ease a position said to be the "intelligent" one. After all, bigots are stupid, right?) For further discussion of the mechanism, see "I am not a bigot -- because you are!" MORE: Nothing in this post is intended to disparage the value of parody, which I engage in regularly here, and which is protected free speech. This recent parody of Exodus International is a classic example, and I think the people threatening litigation only make themselves look ridiculous. That such parodies are constitutionally protected, however, does not make them valid educational tools. posted by Eric on 05.18.06 at 11:08 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I feel like answering the questionnaire.
1. What do you think caused your heterosexuality?
No idea. Some say nature, some say nurture.
2. When and how did you first decide you were heterosexual? Was there something that happened to you?
I think it was when I saw a skin flick when I was six.
3. Is it possible your heterosexuality is just a phase you may grow out of soon?
Yes.
4. Is it possible your heterosexuality stems from a neurotic fear of others of the same sex?
Possibly. However, I am sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex, suggesting that this is unlikely. Also, I honestly think I'm more scared of women than men, but that might be because I don't think of men in a sexual light. In other words, if I displease a woman, she might not have sex with me. If I displease a man, the worst case scenario, as it stands now, is we hit each other. The former is much worse than the latter.
5. Isn't it possible that all you need is a good gay or lesbian lover? Have you ever had a positive gay or lesbian sexual experience?
Maybe, and no.
6. Heterosexuals have histories of failures in gay or lesbian relationships. Do you think you may have turned to heterosexuality out of a fear of failing again?
This one really doesn't seem like it could work in reverse. Maybe I'm wrong. I've had no such history, and if fear of failing motivated me, I'd swear off women, not men.
7. If you've never slept with a person of the same sex, how do you know you wouldn't prefer that?
Good question. I don't.
8. If heterosexuality is normal, why are a disproportionate number of mental patients heterosexual?
Maybe homosexuality causes some kind of defense against mental illness? No idea.
9. Why do you insist on being so obvious and making a public spectacle of your heterosexuality? Can't you just be what you are and keep it quiet?
Actually, except when I'm answering this kind of thing, I do try and keep it quiet.
10. Heterosexuals are noted for assigning themselves and each other into restricted stereotyped sex-roles. Why do you cling to such unhealthy role playing?
I think they have some basis in biology. Even if they didn't, they are sexy. That's really motivation enough to do almost anything. Again, this one seems to work less well in reverse.
11. How can you enjoy a fully satisfying sexual experience or deep emotional rapport with a person of the opposite sex, when the obvious physical, biological and temperamental differences between you are so vast? How can a man understand what pleases a woman or vice-versa?
Really, I'm not complicated. Also, I find women sexually attractive, so that helps.
12. How could the human race survive if everyone were heterosexual like you, considering the menace of overpopulation?
Economic development curtails overpopulation fears nicely.
13. Why are heterosexuals so promiscuous?
I don't know with certainty. If I had to bet though, it would be because women are lying, manipulative, cruel, cold shrews. Just a guess.
14. Could you really trust a heterosexual counselor to be objective and unbiased? Don't you fear that she or he might be inclined to influence you in their own leanings?
Yeah, that's a good fear. Putting pressure on people to deny their instincts (that they exist, that is) is wrong, in my mind. Still, if a counselor did that to me, I'd think it was hot.
Anyway, I think you vastly overestimate how open and tolerant kids are these days. I think a questionnaire like this leads to debate. I think that an occasional thing like this can help students understand the past; the problem is only real when people have the idea in their heads that the only thing schools should do is inflict guilt. Especially for things the students didn't even do.