|
|
|
|
October 24, 2005
(But at least sexual freedom is still worse than the economic kind . . .)
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer's Dick Polman, the Republicans are so upset at each other that they're even resorting to calling each other "homo-lovers": Gary Bauer, another religious-conservative leader, is attacking Grover Norquist, a prominent tax-cut activist, for his decision last week to share his economic conservatism with an audience of gay Republicans.If you buy into the conventional Democratic meme that all Republicans hate homos, then Bauer's charge against Norquist would appear to be pretty serious. But I'm not surprised. Because Bauer's not just accusing Norquist of cozying up to the gays; according to Ramesh Ponnuru he's rejected economic conservatism in general: Gary Bauer, in a more modest and principled way, has left the economic-conservative fold on taxes, Social Security, and trade. Libertarian ideas are in retreat in the conservative intellectual world, too.What that means is that Bauer's objection was actually twofold. He'd have apparently been irritated at Norquist for delivering the same talk to the American Enterprise Institute. I never really thought that social and economic conservatism were natural allies, so I can't say I'm surprised by any of this. But with economic conservatism getting the official Republican heave-ho, where does that leave economic conservatives? (I guess they'll just have to sit around until there's an economic disaster, and then break out into a chorus of "I told you so." Meanwhile, if they support the war and oppose socialism, they'll probably continue swallowing what remnants of pride they have and hold their nose while voting Republican.)
MORE: The above link doesn't seem to work, so just go to the Louisiana Libertarian to see the post. posted by Eric on 10.24.05 at 03:18 PM
Comments
Thanks, Steven; I agree. (I spent half the day at the doctor today, so I didn't have much time for posting. Being coffee deprived in preparation for the tests, left me all discombobulated. It's my only vice!) Eric Scheie · October 24, 2005 09:43 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
From mourners to suspects overnight. Who knew?
Educating Diplomats soft spot for crocs? "I Bet The NY Times will jump on this" "slaughter" committed by "high caliber" "automatics" Balancing the polls Despite "dog overpopulation," there's a puppy shortage Squeezing Iran First they came for our elephants.... Hillary's favorite opponent?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Dear Eric:
Good to see you back!
I have admired Grover Norquist ever since he came down on the side of John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner. Before, I had wondered where he stood on crucial non-economic (spiritual) issues. Now I know. He is a consistent individualist.
This reaffirms my 2-dimensional spectrum. What we call "the Left" is but the lower left quadrant, centering on government control of economics in the name of equality. What we call "the Right" is all the other three quadrants, all over the map and even diametrically opposed. An individualist like Grover Norquist has little in common with a moral collectivist like Gary Bauer.
Being as I am in the upper right quadrant of my spectrum, I value sexual and religious freedom more highly than I do economic freedom, but I realize that they are in fact inseparable*, so I oppose the economic as well as the moral form of collectivism. The two converge at the bottom of the spectrum as total collectivism, totalitarianism.
*"Without property rights, no other rights are possible."
-Ayn Rand