|
May 20, 2005
Your children are in danger! And so are your mules!
From time to time I get annoyed by comments which many other bloggers would simply delete as the product of left wing moonbats (or something like that). My view is that unless a commenter uses foul language (which can get me blocked by the various filters), launches a pointlessly insulting personal attack against me, or insults other bloggers (which is worse, as they're not here to defend themselves) I'll just put up with the comments. There are two reasons. One is that I believe in free speech and the uninhibited airing of differences, and the other is that commenters are my readers. If they've gone to the trouble of reading through my long-winded posts and want to comment, that's fine. Unless I suspect there's something else going on like spamming, or blatant trolling to promote another blog, hey, commenters can say pretty much anything they want. That doesn't mean I'll address it or even read it, but it will usually stay there. What prompted this was reading a remark from a supposedly intelligent former (and current) government official which is probably more inane than the most inane comments I've ever gotten here. Eleanor Holmes Norton accused the "gun lobby" of deliberately seeking to have more children killed: Here's a version in quotes, via the Washington Times:It's so outrageous that it's funny. If a commenter left such a remark at a blog, he or she would immediately be the subject of extreme ridicule and much snarktimonious laughter. It is my belief that people are delighted by remarks like Holmes Norton's (at least, those who disagree with her are) because they are so self-discrediting. And so genuinely funny. Laughing at moonbattery, of course, is hardly limited to the right wing, because moonbats are not limited to the left wing variety. John Hawkins (hardly a left blogger with the name "Right Wing News") recently linked to some of the funniest remarks I have ever seen attributed to a "conservative" (assuming this Neal Horsley character qualifies for that label). Here (from Right Wing News) is the actual radio dialogue between Neal Horsley and Alan Colmes (on the latter's radio show): Colmes: "You had sex with animals?"Intrigued by this (after all, my dad grew up on a farm), I streamed the Fox news feed, and sure enough, that's what Horsley said. In fact, in the same interview, Mr. Horsley took sex a step further: If it's warm and it's damp and it vibrates, you might in fact have sex with it.Er, sorry, but Saddam Hussein just isn't my type. HorsesAss.com has more discussion of this moonbat, complete with pictures of some very cute looking watermelons grining coyly during Mr. Horsley's discussion of sex with, um, vegetable matter. (Horsley's point in saying all of this and more appears to be that Jesus "saved" him, but I find myself wondering whether Jesus himself might take umbrage at such a gratuitous personal attack.) What I'd like to see now is a public debate between Norton and Horsley. On Moonbat TV. (They really need to add a show like that, because I know I'd watch it, and I'm sure others would too.) Interestingly enough, Horsley was sued by Geraldo Rivera over remarks the latter made on his TV show accusing Horsley of being an "accomplice to murder" for publishing names of abortion doctors for others to kill. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals stated in part: Defendant/appellant Geraldo Rivera appeals the district court's determination that a statement Rivera made to plaintiff/appellee Neal Horsley during the course of a television program hosted by Rivera is not protected as a matter of law by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution nor by applicable state law. Rivera asserted that Horsley was an "accomplice to murder." Because we find that Rivera's allegedly defamatory statement is absolutely protected as rhetorical hyperbole by both the First Amendment and applicable state defamation law, we reverse.What this means (I think) is that bloggers can call Moonbat Horsley the moonbat that he is. And Moonbat Norton can call the NRA a bunch of child killers. (Yes, Eleanor, I have an inside tip that the NRA headquarters is readying a big McDonalds-like movable numbers sign reading OVER 50,000 CHILDREN KILLED SINCE 1979! Planned Parenthood is working on a sign with a much bigger number of "fetuses murdered so far." All of this leaves Operation Rescue in a quandary because the actual number of murdered abortion doctors looks embarrassingly small. So they're trying to perform a "head count" on the number of mules that went missing.) UPDATE: PLEASE note that I am neither saying nor implying that Eleanor Holmes Norton is the moral -- or mental -- equivalent of Neal Horsley. She's smarter and much kinder than Horsley! (And smarter -- as well as sexier -- than his mules.) posted by Eric on 05.20.05 at 03:09 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2357 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Your children are in danger! And so are your mules!:
» Friday Gatling Blog from Restless Mania
In Tune and In Time, for once. Carnival of the Involuntary, begin! [Read More] Tracked on May 20, 2005 04:11 PM
Comments
Whoa. NPR really has to do a sensitive local color segment down on the farms of Georgia.... urthshu · May 21, 2005 12:15 PM If somebody posted that on even a left-centrist site like MetaFilter they'd get killed in a heartbeat. David C Thompson · May 22, 2005 04:00 AM Mules? Pretty disgusting portrayal of rural people (original meaning of "Pagans"). And that gun owners want to kill children is on the same level as the similar blood libel against Jews. Despicable. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · May 24, 2005 03:57 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"If a commenter left such a remark at a blog, he or she would immediately be the subject of extreme ridicule and much snarktimonious laughter."
For a case in point, see the comment on my original post by someone named chachi, and my and sf-tom's responses.