|
January 25, 2007
The year that dare not speak its name?
In China, it's the Year Of The P-P-P-Pig! Yay! Right? Not in China. According to this detailed WSJ report, the Chinese government is systematically censoring all mentions of pig and pig images -- putting Western advertisers in a mad editing scramble: SHANGHAI -- Next month, China will ring in the Year of the Pig. Nestlé SA planned to celebrate with TV ads featuring a smiling cartoon pig. "Happy new pig year," the ads said.Coca-Cola is pulling its pig ads too. What amazes me about this is it isn't even mandated by the Koran, which forbids Muslims to eat pork. Islamic leaders are usually quick to denounce any and all misinterpretations and mischaracterizations of Islam and the Koran. So why aren't they speaking up? Until they denounce the war on pig images, I'll have to assume Allah doesn't just hate pork, he hates Porky himself! Not to b-b-butt in, but shouldn't the rule be "hate the pork but love the pig"? UPDATE: My thanks to Glenn Reynolds for linking this post! Welcome all! And Happy New Year -- including all you pig lovers out there! Comments are always appreciated, and feel free to look around. MORE: I should stress that the anti-pig campaign (as the WSJ article points out) involves television right now. How far it will go is not entirely clear: The policy shift offers a window on the inner workings of China's governmental machinery, known for its surprise edicts and abrupt shifts in regulation. It wasn't immediately clear whether the ban applies just to ads or to all TV content. And some analysts said the government could still reverse itself, or offer exceptions to the ban.I suspect the targets right now are mainly the big Western advertisers. Are the Piglet stamps that had already been printed safe? It's too early to tell. Pigs are an important part of Chinese culture, and while this is speculation, I think the government might be very hesitant to issue unenforceable edicts. But television is under state control, and Western advertisers are an easy target. AND MORE: Is there a double standard in China where it comes to cultural sensitivities? Are some animals more offensive than others? Or does it depend on who's offended? The reason I bring this up is because in 2004, China celebrated the Year of the Monkey, despite the fact that this forced American blogger Frank J. to spend the year in a state of terror. posted by Eric on 01.25.07 at 07:20 AM
Comments
Methinks it was undisclosed threats of losing lots of business from Islamic regimes. Alan · January 25, 2007 09:42 AM Nearly spewed my coffee when I saw your "That's Allah Folks!" graphic! LOL!!! Thanks for making my day! Richard Wood · January 25, 2007 09:44 AM Last time I checked, the Chinese calendar has been around far, far longer than Islam. How about a little respect FROM Muslims - oh sorry, yeah I forgot, one-way street and all that. Which way is mecca again... Frank · January 25, 2007 09:47 AM Why don't we just cut to the end game now and save everyone a lot of bloodshed, grief and horror? Run up the white flag, submit to Islam, put this nation and all the others under Shari'a., and do whatever Iran wants? Viewed from the point we are reaching now, that's where we are headed anyway. Karen Haff · January 25, 2007 09:49 AM I call faulty research on this. The Chinese government just issued its "Year of the Pig" postage stamps (for image, see: http://news.cctv.com/financial/20070105/106213.shtml ). Meredith Oyen · January 25, 2007 10:02 AM China needs to buy lots of oil and muslim countries have lots of oil to sell ... if the Vatican was sitting on top of the world's biggest oil field China would become catholic in a heartbeat. Max · January 25, 2007 10:03 AM Hmm. Unreported unrest among China's Muslim population? Maybe they're trying to avoid giving agitators an excuse to make trouble. Much good it may do them. RebeccaH · January 25, 2007 10:30 AM Could it be that the Chinese government doesn't care, but all of these multinational companies are afraid of being beheaded by some jihadi nutjob? The Monster · January 25, 2007 10:30 AM Some official didn't get paid in time. That's all, folks. There is unrest among Muslims in the far west, and China has not been placating them. Not at all. Jim · January 25, 2007 10:55 AM All the Muslims I know are quite fond of pigs (one decorated her little boys room with Piglet & Pooh images)--the other saw Babe 3 times! They like to tease us pig eaters for being "savages" for eating such smart endearing critters. Carolynn · January 25, 2007 11:33 AM After all, China doesn't want to inflame their best weapons customers.... Ixman · January 25, 2007 12:38 PM I assume this means an end to the year of the dog as well. ThomasD · January 25, 2007 12:43 PM Time to whip out theElmer Fudd Koran das · January 25, 2007 01:02 PM This is all sillyness.Why would the most popularist country in the world bow down to such a one minded mob of terriosts. Just silly. As a passive person I say Be and Let Be.If you dont like what I do DON'T LOOK allan · January 25, 2007 01:21 PM You know, the pig is unclean in Judaism, too. Very, very not kosher. But do you see the Chinese government give half a damn about Jewish opinion? No, you don't. And it's Jews who keep Chinese restaurants in business. Attila (Pillage Idiot) · January 25, 2007 01:22 PM For those of you who can't read the WSJ story, there are bigger excerpts here. Adrianne Truett · January 25, 2007 01:34 PM Meredith, the piglet stamps had already been made; it seems this latest ban on ads happened quite suddenly. There's more in the article, and while the ban applies to all images in commercials, it's not clear how far it goes: Here's more from the WSJ: "The policy shift offers a window on the inner workings of China's governmental machinery, known for its surprise edicts and abrupt shifts in regulation. It wasn't immediately clear whether the ban applies just to ads or to all TV content. And some analysts said the government could still reverse itself, or offer exceptions to the ban." I suspect the targets right now are mainly the big Western advertisers. But so far, Piglet seems unaffected: "Even as CCTV keeps pigs off the air, images of the animal are proliferating in stores as well as in print ads and billboards in anticipation of the New Year holiday. Starbucks Corp. shops in China are selling bright red pig-shaped piggy banks emblazoned with the chain's name, as well as stuffed-animal pigs. "Walt Disney Co., which is making a major push into China after opening a theme park in Hong Kong, is building its marketing efforts for the year around Piglet, Winnie the Pooh's cartoon sidekick. The company says that market research into Chinese culture and traditions led them to prioritize Piglet, who is a lesser character in other markets. "Piglet will be Disney's most eye-catching image throughout 2007 in China," said the company in a statement before the ban. China's postal service has also launched "Year of Piglet" stamps surrounded by images of the character. Disney had no comment on the ban. Eric Scheie · January 25, 2007 01:52 PM Although it's obviously significant what CCTV does, it is not the arbiter of Han (ethnic majority, non-Muslim) Chinese culture, and certainly not of the culutures of the numerous non-muslim ethnic minorities in China. Plus, advertisers in the U.S. will pull ads that only potentially offend certain minority groups. That's not "waving a white flag" for pete's sake. That's capitalism. This is the same phenomenon, adjusted for the communist setting - not cultural revisionism. Any hysteria over this article is probably overblown. anselm · January 25, 2007 02:36 PM You have really scaped the bottom of the barrel in terms of your reasoning. If you knew anything about Islam (other than "it's bad") you would know that pork is forbidden because pigs are unclean (which is actually a carryover from kosher law). So Muslin can't own pigs, they can't even be around pigs: your "hate the pork but love the pig" betrays your absolute ignorance (which is amply obvious in any case). Frito Pundito · January 25, 2007 02:58 PM Frito Pundito, You know what? Who the hell cares? Islam and moslems do things that the majortiy of people on the face of this planet find offensive in one form or another every damn day and do they give a damn about it? Oh hell no! ALL that counts is if THEY find something "offensive". Well, I got news for them. One of these days (and it will be sooner then they think at the rate they are going) they are going to really have something to whine about. Why? because regular people have just about reached the Popeye point with these brats. And you know what happens to a spoiled brat if they throw one too many temper tantrums? That is right-they get spanked. And there will not be a damned thing the Liberal elitiests in government or their propaganda tools in the media can do about it. As the old saying goes-"No body, no victim. No victim, no witnesses=no crime." Any Mouse · January 25, 2007 04:30 PM If you knew anything about Islam "Humor. It is a difficult concept." jaed · January 25, 2007 04:50 PM Eric - To the best of my knowledge, the stamps have not been recalled, though people have been warned not to put them on packages to send them to Muslim countries. Beyond that, I checked 10 minutes ago, and the CCTV website is running a Samsung ad featuring a cartoon pig (it was on the New Year's page). Similar pig graphics are on Sina. So frankly, I don't buy it. This is not your ordinary year of the pig - it's a golden year of the pig, and that only happens once every 60 years. There is no way there will be no pig images in China this year, in deference to potentially offended Muslims. There might have been a stop to some ads, but I can't help but wonder what else is at play here. Meredith Oyen · January 25, 2007 06:25 PM Frito, I don't think your complaint about my "absolute ignorance (which is amply obvious in any case)" is well founded as we are not talking about being near pigs; just looking at pictures. According to a report from the BBC's Kevin Bocquet: "Muslim leaders say there is no objection to children looking at pictures of pigs" Then there's this old report: The head teacher of a nursery school in Yorkshire, England, has banned "The Three Little Pigs" "for fears it will offend Muslims (http://http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk/ViewArticleMore2.aspx?SectionID=55&ArticleID=277339&Page=1&R eturnUrl=NewsFrontMore.aspx)," the Yorkshire Post reports. Even local Muslims say the decision is stupid: Last night Yorkshire Muslims condemned the move as "nonsense," as their holy book, the Koran, permits followers of Islam to talk or read about pigs as long as they do not eat their meat. Bradford magistrate Bary Malik, an Ahmadiyya Muslim, said: "Every day Muslims recite passages from the Koran. "As the Koran mentions pig, Muslims must say that word. All the Koran says you should not do is eat pork, but there is no harm in using the word or reading it. "This school has gone too far--what will they do next, ban the word cow because Hindus believe the cow is sacred?" Making accusations of "absolute ignorance" is a pretty strong charge, and I don't think it helps your argument. Eric Scheie · January 25, 2007 09:09 PM I haven't seen any unrest amongst the muslims here in China. Well, except when I try to bargain them down too far on nut cake. The big muslim fast food chain here serves beer. Doc · January 26, 2007 01:33 AM "My thanks to Glenn Reynolds for linking this post! Welcome all!" It seems my just penned theory on how to increase blog traffic is bang on. Talk about how Muslims are baaaad, and big bloggers like Malkin and her ilk will link. saskboy · January 26, 2007 01:33 PM Saskboy, beyond the apparent failure of an explanation that the Koran does not condemn pig pictures (which really isn't bad; just an omission) I don't think any Muslims did anything bad here. My intent was to ridicule Chinese censorship. But now that I see you're with "The Alliance of Free Blogs" (the logo and link are on your blogroll), I'll take your apparent resentment of the "Puppyblender" with a grain of salt. Eric Scheie · January 26, 2007 02:18 PM The link to the Alliance is just an ironic twist in my blogroll. It makes reading my Technorati page more interesting, that's for sure, even though I don't agree with more than a fraction of what is written by the members. Saskboy · January 26, 2007 02:56 PM I know how it is. Check out some of my links. Oliver Willis! Eschaton! Orcinus! Egad! Eric Scheie · January 26, 2007 03:34 PM I'd only heard of Eschaton Atrios before. It's probably for the best that there's some 'cross pollination' in blogrolls anyway, it helps keep communication between 'camps' going. saskboy · January 26, 2007 03:54 PM A totalitarian regime trying not to offend? Sirkowski · January 26, 2007 06:34 PM Hmm. Trackback doesn't seem to have taken so here's a Manual Trackback™. Note that fundy Muslims also consider dogs to be unclean, so it should be expected that this will happen again in the Year of the Dog. Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life · January 27, 2007 02:04 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2007
December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The Right Loses Faith
past and future demolition Reparations for you and me too? Guilford Is A Street In Rockford Enabling the flatulence of flat-screen swine Palestinian Civil War Watch - 9 My inner hypocritical desires -- exposed at last! War Talk Iran Answers American Moves NEWS UPDATE? Castro still alive?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
When the belligerent Chinese government kowtows to the Muslims *at the expense of offending its own people and culture*, you know our dhimmitude is pretty much complete.
I wonder what prompted this - undisclosed threats, perhaps?