|
January 08, 2007
historic bullies deserve historicism!
In a classic example of bullies playing victim, Saudi-assisted Muslims have been demanding the right use Spain's Cordoba Cathedral as a mosque in the hope of reclaiming it: The recuperation of places and buildings that were once mosques or sacred Islamic sites is the primary method employed by Muslims to reconquer Al-Ándalus. So-called moderate Muslims are oftentimes more effective than extremists in gaining concessions because of their attempts to portray Western democracies as intolerant if those countries don't cede to certain demands. This technique has been used repeatedly in the case of the Córdoba Cathedral.Especially considering the original Muslim invasion and takeover of Spain, you'd think there'd be a little more sensitivity to Spanish concerns. (Or does "sensitivity" only operate in one direction?) I think it's the height of arrogance for modern Muslims to claim as "theirs" a building lost centuries ago by earlier Muslims. This game of "who was there first" means that because Roman Christians built the Hagia Sofia, they should have the right to take it back. (As Aaron Hanscom points out while in Turkey last November, the Pope "refrained from praying or crossing himself when he visited the Hagia Sophia.") Should Wiccans have the right to "take back" the Vatican and other places once home to pagan activities? As I just got back from Spain, my immediate reaction to the story was to exclaim that I was half expecting Barcelona's statue of Isabel la Católica to stand up and start wielding her sword again. Fortunately, I took a picture of that very statue, and here she is:
Still, she's about likely to get up off her pedestal and start swinging at Muslims as the 12th Imam is to come out of his holy well. I probably have Jason and the Argonauts on the brain and I'm expecting something like this:
Still, she was the first named woman to make it onto a United States coin:
(Unless, of course, Isabella could be rebadged as a Hispanic feminist.) MORE: At Andalucia.com (a tourist site with no particular axe to grind), Lawrence Bohme ("artist, author and conference intepreter") takes a long historical look at the Cathedral: First, the Romans built a pagan temple on the site. After the fall of the Roman Empire, the new Germanic masters of Spain (the Visigoths) replaced it with the Christian church of Saint Vincent. When the Arabs conquered the peninsula in the early 8th century, they tore down the church and began building their great mosque, which - commensurate with Cordoba's importance as the centre of Muslim power in Spain - became the largest mosque in all of Islam after that of Caaba, in Arabia.So, who was there first? I just knew it had to be the Pagans! posted by Eric on 01.08.07 at 06:51 PM
Comments
I talked with Jose about this while I was in Barcelona, and I think the whole thing is an outrage, especially in light of the site's previous history. (First Roman Pagans, then Christians, then Muslims, then Christians.) The arrogance of the Muslims is only matched by the spinelessness of so many Christians. Eric Scheie · January 9, 2007 07:53 AM From Regine Pernoud's The Crusades originally published in 1959: ... a description of two mosques in Acre. These had been converted into churches, but the Muslims were granted the right to use them as meeting places and to pray there facing towards Mecca according to their established custom. ... The situation in Acre was not exceptional, for the same fact is reported by Usama, another Arab writer, who states that in Jerusalem he was able to say his prayers in a former mosque, now a chapel, where Muslims were nonetheless allowed to come to pray according to their own rites. Lorenzo · January 15, 2007 05:33 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2007
December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Must have experience with diapers!
I Believe In America Its Official The Word Is Father To The Deed Religious Liberty If homo lovers are liberal, then mullah lovers are conservative? Oil Outlook But for the grace of God... Why I hate war blogging Will For Life
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I've been considering posting on this for awhile. Talked to Barcepundit about it...and found an interesting website that claims the site is a mosque with a cathedral "squatting" inside of it. Now that's an interesting architectural perspective.
Looks like the Muslims won't get their nose under that tent. Before they go asking for favors, though, they could maybe give back the many, many cathedrals, temples, and holy places they either took over or destroyed. I mean, fair is fair, right?
Maybe we could talk turkey with Turkey and their Christian monuments? Or maybe not...doesn't seem like Muslims return anything. They either blow it up or take it over or keep complaining it's still theirs when it gets re-taken...
Poor babies...