Where left and right meet

This Bildergerger roundup is from a blog which collect writings in which right wing anti-globalism, left-wing anti-globalism, the North American Union, and opposition to the war on terror are all conflated. John Birch Society meets Indymedia?

Excerpt:

now that the Straussian neocons control the levers over at the Pentagon, with their man Rumsfeld at the top of the organizational pyramid, chances are Iran will be lined up in the cross hairs, and before the coming mid-term election. "Because of his chronic unpopularity, Bush is already in a complicated political predicament," writes Dr. Michael Carmichael, a public affairs consultant and broadcaster. "Bush is facing the loss of his American political hegemony in the midterm elections this November. If Bush loses even one house of Congress, he will face the immediate threat of official probes led by partisan special prosecutors and a rising demand for his impeachment. In his game of poker with Ahmadinejad, Bush has nothing to lose by upping the ante and wrapping himself in the American flag while dropping a massive bombardment onto the primary vortex of his Axis of Evil, Iran."

Of course, official probes and impeachment are, at this point, little more than wishful thinking, as few Democrats have the guts to take down Bush. Nothing short of a clean sweep of the corporate and globalist whorehouse on the Potomac will squash the neocon agenda, now moving along at a steady clip. However, if the Democrats do indeed win come November — and this is less than assured, as the neocons are now seasoned at throwing elections — they may pitch a few speed bumps and slow down the rush to shock and awe Iran into submission, and thus, as Carmichael notes, the neocons may push hard for an attack before the election.

clean sweep of the corporate and globalist whorehouse on the Potomac?

Such rhetoric evokes images of a Bush Clinton partnership to screw the world.

(Kinda cool, if you enjoy that sort of thing. . .)

NOTE: In case readers are wondering . . .

I stumbled onto the above after I discovered that the blog's author -- Steven Yates -- was writing about the "North American Union" before Jerome Corsi got all the attention.

As Mr. Yates said last month (when the Corsi piece appeared),

I've written on the same topic, but I'm an unknown and Corsi is not.
Considering the importance of the allegations (especially if they are true), isn't it fair that credit be given where credit is due?

(Mr. Yates has written extensively about what he calls "9-11 truths," but I don't have time for everything.)

MORE: For the record, Steven Yates original piece (published in the John Birch Society's New American on May 1) is quite similar in its allegations to the Corsi piece in Human Events.

Of course, the origin may date back earlier.

posted by Eric on 06.15.06 at 11:27 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/3722








December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits