|
June 09, 2006
honest speech is not free
Via Mark Tapscott, some words of wisdom from the Washington Examiner: the demands of political correctness too often make it impossible to speak honestly about reality.The piece is about Canadian bureaucrats who can't speak honestly about terrorists, but it's becoming impossible for anyone holding an official position of any consequence to speak honestly about anything. Evan Coyne Maloney (via Pajamas Media) recently brought to the blogosphere's attention the most insane definition of racism I've ever seen (and which I attempted to analyze logically). Among other things, "cultural racism" was defined as "having a future time orientation," and "emphasizing individualism as opposed to a more collective ideology." Cornered as they were by Evan's exposure of their own drivel, Seattle educrats responded by taking down the web site, and issuing a condescendingly incomprehensible explanation from Peter Daniels, school district spokesman: "It did not have enough context for people not working on this issue, and it was poorly written," Daniels said. "... It's about institutional racism, particularly in an educational setting. There are particular structures and practices in place that disadvantage other students who are not of the Caucasian or white majority. It's really examining our own practices and education, but that wasn't very clear."In other words, they don't want Seattle teachers to place value on time or individuality, but when they're called on it they pretend to disavow it in educratese. Evan Coyne Maloney (who deserves the highest congratulations, BTW) is not satisfied with the "explanation" either. I'd say they're guilty as charged, and I think parents using Seattle public schools are morally guilty of child abuse. But if I were in a position of "responsibility," I'd be fired for saying that, wouldn't I? Because power belongs to those who can stand to spend hours in the same room listening to their dishonest bureaucratic jargon, people who speak honestly tend to be ruled by those who don't. Furthermore, those who don't speak plainly not only hide behind special language, they rule by committees, so that ultimately, no one can be blamed for actually having decided anything. The result -- a near-total lack of accountability -- used to go unchallenged until the blogosphere came along. It might not seem like much, but the fact that Seattle educrats removed words from their web site reveals that it's honesty they fear. If I were them I'd get to work trying to figure out ways to shut down -- or at least counter -- the blogosphere. Because if something isn't done, sooner or later bloggers will start showing up and start live-blogging their damned committee meetings! posted by Eric on 06.09.06 at 10:11 AM
Comments
You know, having recently read Atlas Shrugged ... your second to last paragraph holds a very solid image for me. mdmhvonpa · June 9, 2006 03:08 PM Hey Eric, This is in response to one of your old posts that i saw just now: http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/002502.html You're fukking dumbass and complete idiot. It's these self-righteous people like you who claim to be proponents of education only to use it divisively to your advantage. You disseminate misleading information and then argue that the people that want to change the way history is taught are misstating history. The truth is slaves were brought to the British North American colonies (later known as the United States of America) as early as the 1520's to the San Miguel de Gualdape colony who was founded by Lucas Vásquez de Ayllón. 1865 (the year slavery abolished) - 1520 (around the time slavery was first established) = 345 years. But who's counting? "The United States inherited slavery." You make it seem as if the same people including the founding fathers who were enslaving people weren't the people who were responsible for it. As if the colonies were a different people than the people who founded America in 1776. You a dumb mothefukker. Giving out misleading information and using it to support your views. And you got these people following, looks like the blind leading the blind. Either that or the ignorant leading the ignorant. "If you don't like it fuk you," you said. Well, i'm not feeling you so i'm feeling mutual so fukk you too and all the fascists, racists and bigots on this site. Neez Buck · June 9, 2006 03:55 PM Neez Buck, you should learn how to disagree politely. You lack manners, and this reflects poorly on you and your family. Harkonnendog · June 9, 2006 04:15 PM Thanks RB, MDM, Hark! Neez Buck, the IP numbers from your comment indicate you're posting from the University of Pennsylvania system. If you're a student, the accuracy of the historical information you provide doesn't speak very highly about the quality of a Penn education. Regarding "the San Miguel de Gualdape colony who was founded by Lucas Vásquez de Ayllón" it was NOT a "British North American colony" but a Spanish colony abandoned soon after it was founded: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Colonial_America Historians don't agree on its exact location, but think it was in what is now the state of Georgia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Miguel_de_Gualdape Even without the gratuitous insults, your argument is simply unpersuasive. In future, please don't leave the same comment on multiple posts, as it's distracting to other commenters' threads. Thanks. Eric Scheie · June 9, 2006 04:57 PM Neez: You thought a colony called San Miguel de Guadalupe was British? Founded by Lucas Vásquez de Ayllón? Seriously? Jon Thompson · June 10, 2006 06:20 AM Jon, for all we know, the man is an educrat. Perhaps we're expecting too much. Eric Scheie · June 10, 2006 09:22 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"It did not have enough context for people not working on this issue, and it was poorly written," Daniels said.
Translation: "You outsiders don't have enough background to understand what we're doing."