|
October 11, 2005
Official rules of disengagement?
Unlike the bomb which exploded in front of the football stadium at Oklahoma University, bombs at Georgia Tech are considered a "terrorist act": Under Georgia law, a terrorist act is committed if a bomb is left behind with the intent of causing the evacuation of a building: Under Georgia state law, a terroristic act is described as the release of a "hazardous substance," specifically for "the purpose of causing the evacuation of a building" with "reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror."I'm a little confused here. Why is this story more newsworthy than the bomb in Oklahoma? Should allegations of a suicidal intent coupled with a bomb actually lessen public interest, or make it any less a case of terrorism? Can this mean that had Joel Hinrichs simply gotten up and walked away from his bomb without exploding it, that he'd have been a terrorist? I'd call it a distinction without a difference, but obviously, the distinction makes all the difference. So what are the rules, anyway? Unless I am mistaken, the Official Rules To Determine When Bombings Are Terrorism And When They Are Not seem to be along the following lines: 1. "Normal" bombs are considered terrorism if unaccompanied by the bomber, and the incidents may be reported by mainstream media. 2. But if the bomber kills himself with the bomb, that is not to be considered terrorism, even if the bomb goes off 100 yards from 84,000 people -- and the incidents may not be reported by mainstream media. Hey, I don't make the rules; I'm only trying to make sense of them. I should try harder? MORE: Glenn Reynolds links (via LGF) to a report of a bomb discovered at UCLA. A calm and quiet Westwood was briefly disrupted Friday afternoon when the Los Angeles Police Department bomb squad inspected and detonated an explosive device found within the Midvale Plaza apartment complex on the 500 block of Midvale Avenue.The "T" word is not being used. Three bombs, three campuses, three sets of "rules"? I hope this isn't becoming a pattern. . .
Was it (as her readers have suggested) a run-of-the-mill prank? Why does it seem so difficult for the media to just tell us what they know? MORE: Via Powerline's John Hinderaker: Unless you live in Oklahoma and follow the local news, or else read conservative blogs, you probably wouldn't know anything about Joel Hinrichs, the University of Oklahoma student who almost surely tried to carry off a mass suicide-murder at an OU football game.(Or unless you're a journalist from the school of non-reporting.) UPDATE: My thanks to Michelle Malkin for linking this post -- especially in an important discussion of yet another mysterious death, this time in San Diego: SAN DIEGO - A man who fatally shot himself in his University City condominium during a standoff with San Diego police was identified Saturday as a 29-year-old student.I'm with Smash (who's also mystified by a mysterious plane theft.) What on earth is going on, anyway? The thing good that can be said about all these strange incidents is that innocent bystanders don't seem to be getting killed. (Yet.) UPDATE: There are pictures here of the San Diego incident. MORE: This is probably nothing: ENCINITAS, CA - (10-10-05) Authorities are investigating the discovery of an explosive device found under a car in an Encinitas parking lot Monday. Deputies were called to the apartments on the 1700 block of South El Camino Real around 9m. Bomb technicians disabled the device and no injuries or damage was reported. Investigators believe the placement of the device was random. Anyone who may have information about this incident is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 888-580-TIPS.I'm glad it was random. Otherwise I might be concerned. And Glenn Reynolds links to more about the mystery plane, while offering words of wisdom: I agree, but I just wish there wasn't so much pending.Briscoe Field may sound familiar to you. It should. Two of the hijackers who crashed airliners into the twin towers on Sept. 11, 2001, trained at Briscoe Field. Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi did flight training at the Lawrenceville airport about eight months before the attacks.Hmm. This is odd, and when you put it together with the bomb incidents at Oklahoma, Georgia Tech, and UCLA plus the New York subway scares and this odd story from San Diego, it sounds like something odd is going on. But is it -- or are we just noticing more odd events in the wake of the New York subway scare? It's hard to say. If this is the much-ballyhooed "Ramadan offensive" by Al Qaeda, then by all appearances it's awfully lame. Of course, it could be a series of distractions, but that seems unlikely, too. I'm going with "chain of coincidences" for the moment, pending some reason to think there's a connection, as a lot of readers seem to. Another report titles the San Diego story "Home Chemical Lab." Really now! Running a home chemical lab is nothing to kill yourself over.... UPDATE: Speaking of suicde, after that last comment, I spent several hours researching the ingredients and recipes needed to make TATP bombs, and I stumbled onto a very interesting detail which I think might provide a possible explanation for Hinrichs' still unexplained death. New post here. posted by Eric on 10.11.05 at 08:33 AM
Comments
Y'all ought to know that the media has always been on the side of the destructors of capitalism. Frank · October 11, 2005 01:10 PM The media blackout on all of these "random" events has been stunning. Atlanta has now been the home of 3-the Georgia tech incident, the bomb at a north Atlanta gas station- and now the stolen airplane. The idea has been bandied about that the airplane was taken in a joyride, but it could also have been used for transport of people/materials. The airport is right next to the interstate north of the city. I would, as an aside, like to note that all of the Middle-easterners (from Lebanon, Iran, Turkey, and Iraq) I worked with in Atlanta in the 80's were students at GA Tech. American Mother · October 11, 2005 02:18 PM Excellent points. Why one is considered terrorism and the other isn't does seem to be hair splitting, despite the fact that the Hinrichs' situation appears to be the more serious of the two. lawhawk · October 11, 2005 02:31 PM One can only hope that the FBI is not as lame as the media. Please. Patricia · October 11, 2005 03:03 PM Is anyone going to ask what the chemical smell smelled like? Spetiam · October 11, 2005 05:33 PM TATP has a "funny smell" -- which led me to my latest post. Eric Scheie · October 11, 2005 07:36 PM Or perhaps you all are rather in tin foil hat territory, insofar as the pathetic little twerp merely blew himself up and no substantive evidence exists to call the suicide terrorism. lounsbury · October 12, 2005 09:59 AM I've known a lot of "pathetic little twerps" and none of them felt a need to buy ammonium nitrate. The problem is no substantive evidence exists to call the Hinrichs death suicide, OR terrorism. I'd simply like to know what happened, and it isn't being reported. I'll consider all theories (tin foil or otherwise), but right now I'm convinced by nothing. Eric Scheie · October 12, 2005 11:23 AM I do not wear tin foil hats, nor rose-colored glasses. My job is to keep an eye on what is going on and be aware of my surroundings so that I may be able to protect my family and myself. I live in a university town (which is stuffed full of anti-war tra-la-la liberals) next to a major American city (which is stuffed full of immigrants from everywhere)- and I leave no stone unturned. Only until recently have I been searched and wanded during every flying holiday, when once 20 Middle Easterners (not even speaking English) sailed on through unchecked - therefore I do not always trust the government when it comes to being forthright and sensible on Homeland Security issues...and I never trust the press. So, if I hear that anyone has blown themselves up on our soil, I take notice. If that someone (with no yard to put it on) has attempted to buy a fertilizer which is known as a bomb component, I think he wants to make a bigger hole than needed just for himself. If that someone has any Middle-Eastern connections, I will definitely think it may be the worst (until proven otherwise) -and that gives me reason to raise my vigilence. There is an obvious coverup -and a withholding of information... Curioser and curioser. American Mother · October 12, 2005 11:30 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's all terrorism as far as I'm concerned.
And Michelle Malkin wrote:
"In a post-9/11 world, though, such incidents can no longer be taken lightly. The local cops were right not to rule out the worst possibilities. A couple of readers point to Georgia Tech's central role as an information/computing hub for counterterrorism/first responder research as reason the campus might be targeted by non-pranksters."
You wrote:
"Why does it seem so difficult for the media to just tell us what they know?"
When it comes to bringing down a Republican President, the media cry "the people have a right to know!" When it comes to bringing down terrorists, they clam up. The media are on the side of the enemy. I have had it.