|
|
|
|
October 11, 2005
Unstable ingredient of failure?
While more than a few stubborn details have troubled me about the recent explosions and odd near-misses, a comment made by police in the San Diego "home lab" suicide prodded me into doing a little hard research into explosives. Police were sent to the 8700 block of Costa Verde Boulevard after someone reported a strong odor coming from a condo about 1 p.m. Friday, SDPD Sgt. Jim Schorr said.The guy went right back inside and killed himself, and a home chemical lab was later found. While I haven't yet read details about whatever was inside, I've been stuck on the smell. Might the smell have been related to the TATP/Mother of Satan/London bomber stuff that everyone's talking about? Sure enough, I found that according to news reports about the London bombing, there was a "funny smell": Three passengers on the top deck escaped injury. According to some reports, they were covered in white powder, prompting speculation that it was a chemical ingredient, acetone peroxide, from the main device and the same explosive used in the bomb attacks two weeks ago.As it turns out, funny smells characterize TATP (conventional name is simply "acetone peroxide") -- characterized by Wikipedia as having a "distinctive acrid smell." Indeed, the smell is so distinctive that one of the London bombers is believed to have tried to hide the smell with perfume. While that doesn't prove that Mr. Yasufi was cooking up TATP in San Diego, a funny smell followed by an immediate suicide might offer what the police call a "clue." My curiosity was much aroused by this, and I've read plenty of reports of how "easy" it is to manufacture TATP, and how it's "the same explosive" as that used in the London bombings. So, I thought, let's see whether I, someone who barely passed high school chemistry, could track down the recipes on the Internet. At the outset, I was drawn to an ethical discussion by the famous cryptographer Bruce Schneier, who discussed the ingredients in the London bombings. (The beginning quote is from a non-functional CNN link.): It's an odd detail, but if you Google TATP and London you get more hits than if you Google HMDT and London, even though New York police have described HMDT as the London ingredient. (But they're similar, and both can be readily made.)The NYPD officials said investigators believe the bombers used a peroxide-based explosive called HMDT, or hexamethylene triperoxide diamine. HMDT can be made using ordinary ingredients like hydrogen peroxide (hair bleach), citric acid (a common food preservative) and heat tablets (sometimes used by the military for cooking).For those of you upset that the police divulged the recipe -- citric acid, hair bleach, and food heater tablets -- the details are already out there. Schneier is absolutely right about the manufacturing details -- for HMTD and TATP -- being readily available. They're all over the place, and frankly, at this point in time I don't think it makes any difference where they are. Our enemies not only have them, they've probably improved on them, and would probably consider a lot of the Internet recipes to be kid's stuff. (For "every little boy" who likes to play with bombs, of course...) At one such recipe site, I noticed that both HMDT and TATP (yes, recipes for both are there, and one duplicates the Schneier-linked recipe) are best used as primary explosives. What's a primary explosive? There are two types of explosive devices, High Explosives which when initiated expand into their gaseous phase at a very fast rate. A low explosive however expands at a slow rate. A well known high explosive is C4 and Gunpowder a low explosive. Detonating explosives are very sensitive to heat, friction and impact, there are two types of detonating explosives; Primary and Secondary, the Primary is extremely sensitive and dangerous to handle, usually used in small quantities in detonators. The Secondary explosive is very safe to handle and is usually initiated by the primary explosive.A typical secondary explosive, I read, is ammonium nitrate. Because I tend to oversimplify things that are complicated, I found myself drawn to this recipe site because it reduces the TATP manufacturing process to two utterly simple paragraphs. (I won't reproduce it here, because it's childish and unnecessary, but just take my word for it.) While there are plenty of TATP recipes, it was at the last site that something else grabbed my attention: A very good secondary explosive can be made by mixing the AP with Ammonium Nitrate which is found in fertilizers. The fertilizer you use must contain at least 80 percent Ammonium Nitrate. Mix the pulverized Ammonium Nitrate with AP properly. You may use the following proportions depending on the purity of the Ammonium Nitrate.Acetone Peroxide (aka TATP) plus ammonium nitrate? Unless the reports are mistaken, Joel Hinrichs: 1) already had TATP (an extremely unstable, primary, explosive); and 2) tried unsuccessfully to purchase ammonium nitrate (a very stable, secondary explosive). We also know that the police intended to follow through with their investigation into Hinrichs' attempted buy. We are told that Hinrichs had a history of depression, but I've hesitated to call this a suicide because it seems so abnormal for any depressed person to use such a method. But what about failure? If you can for a moment, just try to put yourself into the mind of someone like him, and ask how might the failure to obtain that crucial ammonium nitrate have made you feel? Devastated, I'd say. And not just because he didn't score the secondary explosive, either. The cops were onto him, and (in his mind at least) he was now a known, marked man. Seen this way, his suicide might very well be analogous to that of a TATP cook whose aromas drew the heat. Might he have known the jig was up? Obviously, this is speculation, but this is consistent both with the theory of suicide and with what is known about the facts. It's also consistent with doing something so incredibly reckless and stupid as sitting down on a bench and zoning out with a notoriously unstable device and contemplating your utter failure. (And also contemplating, possibly, the disapproval and disgust of the people you might have hoped to impress as a wannabe hero....) While it still isn't known what was in the Hinrichs apartment because the warrant was sealed, it's very likely that there were bomb-making ingredients (and probably instructions), because after all, this was a death by homemade bomb. One thing is clear about TATP. It's as unstable as the people who are attracted to it. MORE: Via Dr. Rusty Shackleford, here's a report that the FBI refuse to confirm or deny whether the bomb was in fact TATP as previously reported, or what it was, because the warrant was sealed. Obviously, the bomb had to be made of something, and TATP being so simple to make, it's as likely a culprit as any. While I can understand the need to keep the lid on an ongoing investigation (and thus not disclose certain details) the apparent urgency to deny that Hinrichs was a terrorist makes little sense in light of the attempted ammonium nitrate purchase. Not that his failed purchase proves any connection to organized terrorist groups, of course. But think about this. Ammonium nitrate is used for huge explosions, and it is the stuff demolition contractors use to cut through mountains. Timothy McVeigh used ammonium nitrate, and the official story has always been that he had no connection to terrorist groups. But has anyone ever suggested that Timothy McVeigh was not a terrorist simply because no organizational ties were found? I'm wondering whether today they would. Seriously. From the CNS story: The head of the FBI investigation of a suicide bombing at an Oklahoma University football game said the investigation has yielded no information tying the bomber to terrorist activities, in spite of Internet reports to the contrary.Is the FBI's contention that things like detonating a bomb 100 yards from 84,000 people and attempting to buy ammonium nitrate are not "terrorist activities"? If so, then I'd suggest a little common sense might be in order. Except that I'm worried that this might not be a failure of common sense, so much as another indication of deception -- by a lot of people, both in media and government. If that's the case, it might help answer the question Glenn asked last night: WHY SO LITTLE COVERAGE of the Oklahoma suicide bombing?(Am I allowed to say, "Why indeed"?) posted by Eric on 10.11.05 at 04:44 PM
Comments
Purchasing ammonium nitrate to plan to detonate around 84,000 people is obviously an act of terrorism and lunacy. Anyone who wants to kill them self or others has some serious issues and needs psychiatric help. What if he would have bought the chemicals to make a bomb under the following circumstances? 1) There would be NO intention to harm or inflict injury on anyone including himself. 2) The device itself would be small. 2) The detonation would occur in a controlled environment on authorized private property outside city limits as well as a safe distance (miles) away from anything or anyone that could be affected by the blast radius. 3) The procedure from start to finish would be conducted in a safe, well planned manner by experienced individuals (Adults of course). 4) Careful calculations taking into account possible changes of the predicted blast radius and the proper action taken to counteract the inflicting components which may include postponing the detonation. 5) ABSOLUTELY NO shrapnel will be added to increase the damage within blast radius. This includes; nails bolts, foreign objects or sharp debris, etc. 6) No armed detonating devices in the vicinity UNTIL final walk-through is completed and confirming all involved individuals are in the proper safety zone. 7) a. The individuals conducting the detonation have had no criminal records or violent acts prior to detonation. This includes no connection with terrorist groups etc. b. The individuals accepts full responsibility for any injuries involved during and after the detonation sequence which includes those individuals conducting future experiments in an unsafe manner with or without the intention to harm others. Joshua · October 15, 2005 06:11 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Tried to get his hands on ammonium nitrate, stuff that demolition contracters use to cut through mountains? I say he's a terrorist! And I'm certain he wasn't alone in this business. Quite the opposite. I have read that McVeigh had connections to Islamic terrorist groups also.
I hope the FBI is keeping this under wraps in order to carry on a thorough investigation, and not knuckling under to Political Correctness. Too bad J. Edgar Hoover isn't around any more. He would have known what to do. He never kow-towed to the Communists. They hated him.