|
October 06, 2005
The First Amendment lives! (At least in Delaware.)
This strikes me as not only the right legal result, but a good result for bloggers: In a decision hailed by free-speech advocates, the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision requiring an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official.First of all, I'm not at all sure that suggesting someone is a homosexual is any more defamatory than suggesting he's a member of a certain race. What I said two years ago still applies: As to the tortious nature of the conduct, I am not at all sure of the current status of defamation law, and there are public policy considerations underlying what is legally actionable and what is not. If, for example, rumors are spread that a white man is black, he cannot prevail under a defamation theory, because legally, it ought not be defamation to say that someone is black. Or Muslim. Whether the imputation of homosexuality is defamatory these days is open to question, at least in some places.In any case, I guess imputing homosexuality is defamatory in Delaware. Because under this theory, the plaintiff demanded the identities of the anonymous bloggers and persuaded the trial court to order the bloggers' host(s) to "unmask" them. The Supreme Court, however, reversed, holding that a higher standard was required, and that the plaintiff would have to prove defamation: "Because the trial judge applied a standard insufficiently protective of Doe's First Amendment right to speak anonymously, we reverse that judgment," Chief Justice Myron Steele wrote.I like that language. The First Amendment is alive and well in Delaware. Hell, Delaware's less than an hour away from me; perhaps I should move. (Nah. Despite the ferocity of my anarchic libertarian political views, I'm too personally conservative to do things like slander people willy-nilly.) Anyway, in order to obtain the identities of anonymous bloggers (at least in Delaware), the Court announced a new standard: a plaintiff must first try to notify the anonymous poster that he is the subject of subpoena or request for a court to disclose his identity, allowing the poster time to oppose the request. The plaintiff would then have to provide prima facie evidence of defamation strong enough to overcome a summary judgment motion.Juan non-Volokh has more, and links to the court's opinion. I am not much of a fan of libel actions, which I worry will increasingly be used as a cynical tool to silence or intimidate bloggers. (Passions have already been mobilized in certain quarters....) I hope more states follow Delaware's lead. posted by Eric on 10.06.05 at 08:21 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2869 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The First Amendment lives! (At least in Delaware.):
» I'm living without you / I know all about you from The White Peril 白禍
Eric likes the Constitution State's Supreme Court's ruling on a First Amendment case a few days ago. (Well, the act... [Read More] Tracked on October 7, 2005 10:01 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Holiday Blogging
The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth! My dirty thoughts
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Free speech triumphant. That's good.
Well, I've been called a homosexual ("faggot") even though I'm gynosexual, and I've been called a Jew ("kike") even though I am not of that faith, by teenage punks riding by in their cars and yelling out the window. Says far more about them than about me or anybody else.