Operation Get Rich Quick!

A few days ago, I was quite amused to see Sidney Blumenthal's comparison of Bush to Nixon.

The problem, though, with recycling the same canned comparison with the same characters is that it's as unoriginal as it is boring. And the fact is, Bush has a lock these days on being the evil Nixon. Which makes a mere comparison of Bush to Nixon too humdrum for the likings of writers like The New York Times' Frank Rich, who likes spicy writing.

Therefore, Rich has had to ratchet up the comparison a notch further. After an obligatory nod to Bush-as-Nixon (he takes it a step further by saying Bush's "hubris" "outstrips Nixon's by the day"), he breaks in an entirely new meme by comparing bloggers to Watergate figure Chuck Colson:

This is the kind of lapdog news media the Nixon White House cherished. To foster it, Nixon's special counsel, Charles W. Colson, embarked on a ruthless program of intimidation that included threatening antitrust action against the networks if they didn't run pro-Nixon stories. Watergate tapes and memos make Mr. Colson, who boasted of "destroying the old establishment," sound like the founding father of today's blogging lynch mobs. He exulted in bullying CBS to cut back its Watergate reports before the '72 election. He enlisted NBC in pro-administration propaganda by browbeating it to repackage 10-day-old coverage of Tricia Nixon's wedding as a prime-time special. It was the Colson office as well that compiled a White House enemies list that included journalists who had the audacity to question administration policies.

(Emphasis added.)

Much as I hate to admit it, Rich is right. What I want to know is, precisely how did he find out about the "ruthless program of intimidation"? Who leaked? Where the hell did that sneak find out that bloggers have been using the full weight of the federal government to threaten antitrust actions against the major networks? That, of course, is exactly what we do! Like Bush's hubris, blogger misuse of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division outstrips Nixon's by the day.

While it's been tough work destroying the old establishment, by writing such exposes of the blogosphere in such a blatant and challenging way, Frank Rich highlights an embarrassing point: obviously the blogosphere has not been tough enough or thorough enough!

And I swear by the soul of Tricky Dick Nixon himself that I'm going to see to it that Frank Rich will be placed at the very top of the Official Blogger Enemies List!

Hell, as a matter of fact, I won't even wait for the list to be compiled! First thing Monday, I'm going to direct my boys at the IRS to do an official audit of Mr. Rich!

"Don't Follow the Money," taunts the high and mighty Rich.

We'll just see about that!

UPDATE: Via Glenn Reynolds, I see that Frank Rich has been thoroughly (and democratically fisked "lynched" by Tom Maguire, who points out that Rich's comparison-to-Colson meme extends far beyond bloggers:

...the "neo Colsons" include CNN, which cited the Pentagon assertion before rebutting it; the Washington Post, which implicated Newsweek in their lead paragraph; and the NY Times. Have the neo-Colson's swept the board?
Hey, I believe in democracy, and fairness. And if everyone gets to be Hitler, isn't it democratic -- and fair -- that everyone should also get to be Colson?

I guess I shouldn't have been so defensive about the "blogging lynch mobs" remark. Instead, I should be grateful that Frank Rich is being inclusive.

My mistake.

MORE: In light of my mistake, I'm now reconsidering the IRS audit.

posted by Eric on 06.11.05 at 11:44 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2439



Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Operation Get Rich Quick!:

» HEH. NOW THAT'S RICH! from Right Wing Nut House
Frank Rich was, at one time, drama critic for the New York Times. Apparently the smell of the greasepaint and the roar of the crowd finally got to the moonbat because the Times editoral staff eventually realized he'd gone 'round the bend and decided ... [Read More]
Tracked on June 12, 2005 12:13 PM
» Has Frank Rich Ever Left New York? from Decision '08
Or even the Upper West Side of Manhattan? Can anyone truly be as out of touch as Rich is? And can there be any doubt that the editorial page of the New York Times is now as credible as Michael Jackson's defense team? Rich's latest tiresome screed is ... [Read More]
Tracked on June 12, 2005 06:27 PM



Comments

Hitler, Nixon, Colson. Is your friend George Gordon Battle Liddy next? I hope so. But those men were pikers. The Leftists have just got to get around to equating President Bush with the ultimate bete noir of the Left, The Most Evil Man In Mankind's History: Senator Joe McCarthy

Yeah, yeah, silly point by Rich. I agree.

But to be fair, there were some points in the article that were pretty good.

Like the media's giving Colson a complete pass when he was trotted out.

Joe   ·  June 12, 2005 05:11 AM

But what does it mean to give Colson a pass? A failure to deliver a sound moral thrashing and scolding? G. Gordon Liddy usually brags about his convictions and his prison term, and even brings them up if they forget to ask him about it, but most of the time the interviewers act like that's old news and they don't want to dwell on it. I don't know if that's a pass, but it's well known history. Should Bill Clinton be asked about his disbarment every time he appears on TV?

Colson should have been asked to place this in context, but bear in mind that it isn't so simple as excoriating him as an evil man or something like that. His specific conviction was for leaking FBI records to the press (details here). Discussing the details of that is a rather tall order when he's on for a quick soundbite, and it might even cause confusion among listeners, because the nuances of record leaking is a still-unsettled area of morality.

Were I running the talk show, I would have wanted to ask Colson about it, but I'd be willing to bet my producers wouldn't let me.

Eric Scheie   ·  June 12, 2005 09:24 AM

I hate to have to say it, but I condemn Charles Colson, not for anything he did during the Watergate imbroglio, but because he is on record (twice, once after Bowers vs. Hardwick [1986] and after Lawrence and Garner vs. Texas) [2003] as supporting "sodomy" laws. Anybody who supports "sodomy" laws is my enemy. In the name of holy Dawn and her holy Negro wife Norma, I'd better go further than that and emulate the great and hated Senator: Anybody who supports "sodomy" laws is probably a Communist.



December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits