|
May 27, 2005
Political Humor
From the pages of Mossback Culture comes this must see piece of visual persuasion. Please press here. Do it now. Personally, I'm not too keen on either side. It is kind of funny though. This bit from Tom McClintock is good too... Across California, children are bringing home notes warning of dire consequences if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's scorched-earth budget is approved -- a budget that slashes Proposition 98 public-school spending from $42.2 billion this year all the way down to $44.7 billion next year... Read the whole thing. It would be funnier if it weren't true.
posted by Justin on 05.27.05 at 05:49 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2378 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Political Humor:
» CA state Sen. McClintock - comedy gold from Darleen's Place
I grit my teeth some mornings when I'm subjected to the whiney-ass ads on the radio from the 800-pound gorilla, as known as the California Teachers Association. They are absolutely incensed that Gov Schwartzenneger does not properly genuflect in their... [Read More] Tracked on May 27, 2005 07:09 PM
Comments
Erratum: ....some people are thin [ectomorphs].... Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · May 28, 2005 03:42 PM Your definition of "good" is a bit dodgy. Fire the adminstrators. Go ahead. See who runs the school system. Oh, wait! I know! The church! Yeah! Adminstrator salaries are as a good a subject of debate as any, but lets level the playing field, shall we? Regarding the budget, the apparent increase surely takes into account a: the exploding population b: inflation. Neither issue was analyzed or explored by the writer. That's a lie by exclusion. David Howe · June 1, 2005 12:15 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
There isn't any "obesity epidemic". Some people are fat [endomorphs], some people are thin [endomorphs], some people are muscular [mesomorphs], and all the permutations of these, just as skin and hair colors and sexes and sexual preferences are different. And "...God hath shapen lives three, boor and knight and priest they be...." People are inherently different and unequal. That's the way it is and should be, the eternal hierarchy of the Divine.
That was an extremely interesting dualism of women of the Left vs. women of the Right. I have long asked myself the profound philosophical/theological question: which kind of women tend to be sexier, more attractive, more beautiful, more pulchritudinous, more Goddess-like, women of the Left or women of the Right (as defined primarily by where they place themselves on a spectrum)? Hmmm.... That visual certainly indicates one answer, and I have often seen others remark on that idea. E.g., the Goldwater Girls of 1964 were said to be sexy. I would have loved to see a picture of them. I love Camille Paglia and Tammy Bruce, both Starboard Sapphists. On the other hand, I must confess that I am not turned on by Ann Coulter as I used to be, while I find Susan Faludi quite beautiful, and I am extremely turned on by Eleanor Clift even though I disagree with just about every word that comes out of her mouth. I would love to do an experiment and see for myself which type of women is sexier on the whole. E.g., look at 100 or 1000 or 1,000,000 or 1,000,000,000 photos of women of the Left vs. 100 or 1000 or 1,000,000 or 1,000,000,000 photos of women of the Right. I could spend 1,000,000,000 lifetimes, an eternity, pondering that spectrumological question. Most fascinating....!
Holy Dawn and her holy Negro wife Norma on the Far Right [for polytheism, monogamy, and monarchy] vs. wicked Wanda and her women (Wendy, Cindy, Sandy, Candy, Brandy, Brenda, Glenda, Stella, Hannah) on the Far Left [for atheism, adultery, and anarchy]. Wanda enjoys her free existence, while Dawn struggles toward her paradigm of ideal essences....