It's raining cats and dogs!

(Well it is, and I don't mean just outside.)

Civility is not definitely not raining reigning in the blogosphere. Check out the comments to the food fight started by Jeff Goldstein (in response to what can only be called sexed up allegations of acrimony between Glenn Reynolds and Jeff Jarvis.)

I have to agree with this commenter (Russell Wardlow) that Glenn Reynolds "barely reaches the level of mildly peeved," and I wish more people (myself included) could be like that. Glenn Reynolds is someone I consider a true gentleman, the last person who deserves to be subjected to these kinds of attacks.

I'm trying to remain at the mildly peeved level, but I want to stress something I saw in many of the comments. Glenn Reynolds went out of his way to help many of the people who are dumping on him now, and there are others I'm not mentioning. I think their behavior is not only rude, but the height of ingratitude. I don't care whether you agree or disagree with someone; if he has been kind enough to help your blog, the least you can do is not attack him with personal invective.

This election is bringing out the worst in people, and I'm worried that a national pathology -- one grounded in vicious personal attacks -- has been festering for so long that it may become permanent.

I like to think that the blogosphere is different -- and based on dialogue and reason. Disagreement is a natural part of dialogue, but to my mind, once intimidation starts, dialogue is taken outside the bounds of civilized society. I believe the line which we call "civility" is crossed once vicious personal attacks begin. I am shocked to see this happening between people who once were friends, and I want to know, exactly where does it stop?

Seriously, what's next? There has even been a serious attempt to get Glenn Reynolds fired from his job. I think that is so despicable that it should have been unthinkable in the blogosphere. Is the next step home invasion? Physical violence?

I can't believe I need to ask the next question, but I do.

Is this the United States of America anymore?

Or are we becoming like the Mideast?

posted by Eric on 09.08.04 at 06:46 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1419






Comments

"I like to think that the blogosphere is different -- and based on dialogue and reason."

Why? Most face-to-face political arguments are relatively free of reasoned dialogue, and the internet provides a buffer that allows people to be far nastier than they'd ever dare to be in person.

It would be great if every blogger tried to be as civil as Glenn Reynolds and Mickey Kaus (scroll down to "Trustworthy Blogging Initiative II"), but it'll never happen.

MDP   ·  September 9, 2004 05:10 AM

Of course it will never happen! I too am guilty of what I condemn, and I have resorted to personal attacks. What I'd like to see is a consensus emerge that such attacks be acknowledged to be a sign of failure rather than of victory as they so often are. I'd like to see them be the exception rather than the rule. Because, once we allow vicious personal attacks become the standard rather than the exception, human nature being what it is, dialogue will inexorably degenerate into thuggery – and I mean real brownshirt stuff. Surely we can all agree we don't want that. I think it can be stopped earlier if there is at least recognition that personal attacks are beneath a basic standard of civility – rude, "over the top," whatever you want to call it.

Recognizing something is wrong is not the same thing as stopping it, and I am the last person to be so naïve as to imagine stopping it is possible. (We'll never stop lying either, but surely that doesn't make lying right.)

You make a good point that "most face-to-face political arguments are relatively free of reasoned dialogue" and that is a major reason why I blog, because people can't interrupt my stream of thought. But there isn't anything I say here that I wouldn't say in person if people would be crazy enough to give me the time to say it. As to the Internet being a buffer allowing people to be "nastier than they'd ever dare to be in person," I think that's more a characteristic of anonymity. I have long noticed, for example, that the nastiest commenters (and most annoying trolls) are anonymous people without real names and without identified blogs.

Bloggers and blogging are for the most part very different from the chat room and its denizens. In my view this use of the Internet is different, and better. I truly believe there's a higher purpose involved in blogging, and it is ill served when chat room invective becomes the standard.

Eric Scheie   ·  September 9, 2004 07:26 AM


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits