|
March 29, 2004
A "croc" of tears?
Did the hard-hearted Karl Rove make people cry when all they did was surround his house, pound on his windows, and frighten his children? Attack the house tactics are not new: Several hundred people stormed the small yard of President Bush's chief political strategist, Karl Rove, yesterday afternoon, pounding on his windows, shoving signs at others and challenging Rove to talk to them about a bill that deals with educational opportunities for immigrants.(More here.) In tears? Forgive me if I doubt the sincerity the tears of Emira Palacios, professional activist who spearheads this organization. Profile here, she's a "lobbyist" (if that's not too strong of a word), for things like making drivers licenses easier for illegal aliens to obtain, and hands out awards, like the Horse's ass of the year award, which went Dan Stein, Director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). This was after another "action" during which Palacios "descended on the headquarters" of FAIR. The City of Berkeley had an excellent City Manager whose house was subjected to a similar protest seige, causing him to resign his job later. I blogged about this in June: Of course, when I was on the Police Review Commission, it escalated from mere words, and instead of worrying about definitions I found myself fearing for my life.Such tactics can be effective at the City Manager level, because ordinary people don't like it when their kids are menaced by angry mobs. I guess it remains to be seen whether they'll work with Karl Rove. I know there's that old saying "if you can't stand the heat...." but it's easy for me to say. I don't have kids. If people surround my house and bang on the windows, well, I am armed. But the tears are a new wrinkle in this context. Not that I haven't been subjected to tears by professional activists trying to get their way. Once when I was in the unfortunate position of being a "swing voter" (I was not aligned with either Berkeley's Marxist left faction nor the McGovern Democrat "rightist" faction), I was pressured to vote for a woman on the Marxist side. She told me how hard it was as a single mom, and launched into a long rant during which she looked up towards the ceiling and actually started to cry. No sooner had I stated that I had already decided to vote for someone else than the "tears" stopped, her eyes narrowed, and her face took on a very cold, hard stare. She looked right at me, as if to say, "OK buddy, you're on!" At the time I thought of a different kind of tears. It didn't strike me as civilized discourse. The tears were just a tactic, and when they failed, it was time for other tactics to begin. This is not to say that hard-ball activists don't shed real tears, nor can I state definitively that Ms. Palacios was not shedding real tears. But I just don't think surrounding a house and menacing someone's children is consistent with the moral high ground normally associated with being a victim. And even if we assume the tears were sincere, were they tears of contrition? I doubt it. posted by Eric on 03.29.04 at 01:31 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/886 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A "croc" of tears?:
» Civilized Democracy? from achilles running :: achilles not running
And they call this democracy? What could this possibly accomplish, other than to deepen the divide between the leaders & whatever good might be present in the minds of the NPA representatives? Democracy cannot function when people engage in barbarian... [Read More] Tracked on March 29, 2004 04:56 PM
» Civilized Democracy? from achilles running :: achilles not running
Demonstrators Swarm Around Rove's Home, Pounding on Windows Several hundred people stormed the small yard of President Bush's chief political strategist, Karl Rove, yesterday afternoon, pounding on his windows, shoving signs at others and challenging R... [Read More] Tracked on March 29, 2004 05:00 PM
Comments
Harassing a person -- _any_ person, I don't give a damn who it is -- in his or her own home is despicable and unforgivable, an out-and-out destruction of the sacred right to privacy if there ever was one. Period. There isn't any cause -- not any -- that ever justifies such a thing. Period. Your home is your castle, your sanctuary, your cathedral. As I never tire of quoting, in the words of Justice Louis Brandeis, "the right to be let alone is the right most valued by civilized men." Syephen or Starn or Storm Malcolmb Anderssonnn the Lesbian-eating pho-loving aesthete-worshipping gu · March 29, 2004 05:08 PM Do you realize the NPA actually made Rove's home address public in a national press release? Absolutely unconscionable. jen · March 31, 2004 09:52 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Sorry about the double trackback. Bookmarklet didn't quite function properly. The second trackback is correct.
AWESOME.