|
|
|
July 07, 2004
The war gets hairy!
Forgive me for being slow. I've been swamped lately, and until today I had no idea how important John Kerry's choice of John Edwards was. But then I read this: You may have also heard that the man I selected is John Edwards of North Carolina.Kerry is right, of course. Just ask any of the Big Three newscasters; better hair goes a long way! The war? It's no more than a national bad hair day; nothing that can't be cured by a newly invigorated scalp. Forget terrorism; better hair is serious business! Aren't some things worth dyeing for? posted by Eric on 07.07.04 at 01:26 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/1164 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The war gets hairy!:
» Bonfire of the Vanities, #54 from INCITE
Welcome to the web's 54th edition of the Bonfire of the Vanities, the weekly roundup of self-appointed rubbish from the blogosphere. Submissions seem to pretty much cover the entire spectrum of rubbish. Some lean towards the humorous-but-completely... [Read More] Tracked on July 13, 2004 02:39 AM
Comments
Er.. Like my last sentence. Sheesh. Mick · July 7, 2004 08:40 PM Typo fixo! Eric Scheie · July 7, 2004 08:53 PM Their hair is too long. They need haircuts. They all need haircuts. And so do I. Steven Malcolm Anderson (Cato the Elder) the Lesbian-worshipping gun-loving selfish aesthete · July 7, 2004 09:53 PM Normally I would consider such personal characteristics irrelevant in the extreme. But, THEY BROUGHT IT UP! Eric Scheie · July 8, 2004 07:41 AM Of course you would. Youre not as nuanced as the Dems. If you were more sophisticated (as they are) you would realize what deep and forthright conviction is demonstrated by a nice head of hair. Proper attention to grooming = proper attitude towards governing and correct position on the issues. I propose in future elections, the candidates not be allowed to speak at all. We'll just bring in a panel of hairstylists (and maybe a phrenologist or two) and have them elect our national leadership. Unless of course, they couldnt figure out how to use the punch cards. Mick · July 8, 2004 02:34 PM Could the whole anti-war movement really be a function of people preferring Saddam's hair to Bush's? Beck · July 12, 2004 09:09 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Laughing at the failure of discourse?
• Holiday Blogging • The right to be irrational? • I'm cool with the passion fashion • Climate change meltdown at the polls? • If you're wrong, then so is God? • Have a nice day, asshole! • Scarlet "R"? • Consuming power while empowering consumption • Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
For a minute, I thought that last sentence was a typo.