|
|
|
|
January 14, 2004
French libertarianism -- an oxymoron?
80,000 people demonstrating for freedom -- and nothing in the Western press? Where did this take place? The Mideast? An oppressed Third World kleptocracy? Think again! The demonstration -- by libertarians protesting a near-total shutdown in services by government-unions -- was in France! (A government, by the way, which covers up its own wrongdoing while pushing for digital censorship. [Via InstaPundit.]) Are the French almost as ready for freedom as the Iraqi people? Sabine Herold, Editor and spokeswoman for Liberté j'écris ton nom (Liberty, I Write Your Name), expected only 5000 to 10,000 people to show up at the big libertarian rally, and yet there were 80,000! The following are excerpts taken from Ms. Herold's interview in The Atlasphere: I think one of the problems in France is that libertarians are only focused on economic issues. That is not the most important thing. Of course, I think it's really important to be economically libertarian. But what is really the basis of a free society is the idea that people should be free to decide for themselves in any area — that means economically, but also in social issues, moral issues, or any issue. The economy is important but it's not the whole of it. On US French relations: TA: You mentioned that perhaps some of the opposition to the war was based on anti-Americanism. Where do you think this anti-Americanism stems from?If you're as surprised as I was, you should read the whole interview. Why is it that the major media in this country only tell us about the bad things in the world? If freedom is good enough for Iraq, why isn't it good enough for Chirac? posted by Eric on 01.14.04 at 10:11 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/682 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference French libertarianism -- an oxymoron?:
» Blog Watch from On The Third Hand
Steve, who writes good doggerel, pens an ode to a new blogger-belle. She's named after a cat, who was once [Read More] Tracked on January 14, 2004 04:12 PM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Very good. I've been saying the same thing for a long time about libertarians here in Anerica: too much emphasis on economics. Many libertarians are as economically-determinist as Karl Marx, only capitalist rather than socialist. Economics is boring to me. I'm far more interested in spiritual-sexual and cultural issues, the underlying values, and these shape us much more deeply than issues about money.
It is to the credit of certain libertarians that two of their leading organizations, the Institute for Justice and the Cato Institute, filed excellent briefs in the Lawrence & Garner decision defending the right to privacy.
An increasing number of other libertarians, however, especially the "paleo-libertarians", are indistinguishable from Buchanites. The line between "libertarian" and "conservative" is becoming increasingly blurred. Many conservatives such as Andrew Sullivan are far more libertarian than many who call themselves libertarians.