French libertarianism -- an oxymoron?

80,000 people demonstrating for freedom -- and nothing in the Western press?

Where did this take place?

The Mideast?

An oppressed Third World kleptocracy?

Think again!

The demonstration -- by libertarians protesting a near-total shutdown in services by government-unions -- was in France! (A government, by the way, which covers up its own wrongdoing while pushing for digital censorship. [Via InstaPundit.])

Are the French almost as ready for freedom as the Iraqi people?

Sabine Herold, Editor and spokeswoman for Liberté j'écris ton nom (Liberty, I Write Your Name), expected only 5000 to 10,000 people to show up at the big libertarian rally, and yet there were 80,000! The following are excerpts taken from Ms. Herold's interview in The Atlasphere:

I think one of the problems in France is that libertarians are only focused on economic issues. That is not the most important thing. Of course, I think it's really important to be economically libertarian. But what is really the basis of a free society is the idea that people should be free to decide for themselves in any area — that means economically, but also in social issues, moral issues, or any issue. The economy is important but it's not the whole of it.

Also, economics is something that is very boring for many people. I think if you want to touch many people, you should not speak in an economic way — you should tell them about values.

...

[I]n France right now there's actually a political debate about whether civil servants should be paid depending on what they're doing and whether they're good or bad. Some people, especially the unions, are simply opposed to that; they think that when you're in public service, your level of productivity shouldn't be considered. To me that makes no sense. If a civil servant is not efficient, there's no reason to keep paying him. (Pause.) France is still a communist country.

On US French relations:

TA: You mentioned that perhaps some of the opposition to the war was based on anti-Americanism. Where do you think this anti-Americanism stems from?

Herold: Well, I find it very weird, because America helped us twice in the two World Wars, and we have the same culture — the two of us are based on individual freedom and have the same values. So it's strange. Maybe it's because France would like to be more than it is now. It's really complicated. I think it's a kind of love-hate relationship.

TA: I know some people accuse the United States of so-called "cultural imperialism," which basically means that France imports American movies and television shows and other products, and there's a worry that the French culture will change and be diluted and corrupted and so forth. What are your thoughts about that argument?

Herold: I think no one is forced to eat at McDonalds or to go watch American movies. The people get what they want. Those very big Hollywood movies — every one the French people want to see. So they can do what they want. You can't force the people to go to see French films if they don't want to.

If you're as surprised as I was, you should read the whole interview.

Why is it that the major media in this country only tell us about the bad things in the world?

If freedom is good enough for Iraq, why isn't it good enough for Chirac?

posted by Eric on 01.14.04 at 10:11 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/682



Listed below are links to weblogs that reference French libertarianism -- an oxymoron?:

» Blog Watch from On The Third Hand
Steve, who writes good doggerel, pens an ode to a new blogger-belle. She's named after a cat, who was once [Read More]
Tracked on January 14, 2004 04:12 PM



Comments

Very good. I've been saying the same thing for a long time about libertarians here in Anerica: too much emphasis on economics. Many libertarians are as economically-determinist as Karl Marx, only capitalist rather than socialist. Economics is boring to me. I'm far more interested in spiritual-sexual and cultural issues, the underlying values, and these shape us much more deeply than issues about money.
It is to the credit of certain libertarians that two of their leading organizations, the Institute for Justice and the Cato Institute, filed excellent briefs in the Lawrence & Garner decision defending the right to privacy.
An increasing number of other libertarians, however, especially the "paleo-libertarians", are indistinguishable from Buchanites. The line between "libertarian" and "conservative" is becoming increasingly blurred. Many conservatives such as Andrew Sullivan are far more libertarian than many who call themselves libertarians.

Steven Malcolm Anderson   ·  January 14, 2004 03:17 PM

Excellent, thanks for pointing this one out!

Ted   ·  January 15, 2004 09:03 AM


December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits