|
January 05, 2004
More on Angels in America
In a long and thoughtful analysis, Arthur Silber reflects upon Angels in America. It is well worth the read, and I say this even though I am no fan of Tony Kushner. But despite my disagreements, Kushner is a fine playwrite and fair is fair. Arthur calls his review a labor of love, and it really is. A sample: [Angels in America] is stunningly original. It's not a play or film you've seen before: it mixes politics, psychology, sexuality, religion, the countless intersections of all these issues with each other, general cultural trends, the future of the world -- and fantasy elements, lots of wonderful fantasy -- in all sorts of unimaginable ways. Unimaginable, that is, until Kushner imagined them, and presented them as a wonderful gift to all of us. For me, that above all places Angels in America far, far above almost any other new play I can think of in the last decade, or even two. If Angels did nothing else, that alone would be cause for celebration.If you haven't seen Angels in America, at least read all of what Arthur has to say about it. I can't stand crassly politicized art, and I don't like being manipulated (as I complained in an earlier post). But at the same time, I don't think political disagreements should ever interfere with appreciation in the esthetic sense-- or the acknowledgment of artistic genius. posted by Eric on 01.05.04 at 12:14 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I must confess that I haven't seen 'Angels in America'. I'll have to get me a copy. Arthur Silber is a man of fine artistic taste (it's a sign of the times that I guess I have to explain that I _don't_ mean that sarcastically), and so I trust his judgement. It was a _very_ interesting review he wrote.
He makes Andrew Sullivan look like a clod. (Sullivan was the first blogger I ever read, first place I encountered the word 'blog', still read him.) Arthur Silber vs. Andrew Sullivan. Two men's men whose names both begin with "A. S.". If _they_ can't get along, how will _men_ and _women_ ever get along?!