![]() |
|
![]()
January 02, 2004
Even sweet addictions allow no breaks!
This is a bad time for blogging, because in the past few days I have not had any time at all to think, much less write. "All partied out," is as fair a description as I can allow under the circumstances. However, the show must go on, time permitting or not, and it is still Online Testing Day at Classical Values. Let's start with a test which I should have posted yesterday, but because it's a day late it's really more of a New Years Hangover. While my New Years Resolution ought to be to stop vacationing and return to this blog in full swing, the highly resolved Ghost of a flea supplied a test indicating otherwise. According to "What Should Your New Year's Resolution Be?" I should break stuff! ![]() Take the What Should Your New Year's Resolution Be? Quiz A very worrisome logical conundrum, because if I must resolve "to break stuff," then if I break stuff I break stuff, and if I don't break stuff, I still break stuff, because I break my resolution. Worst of all, what if the resolution is interpreted as a command to break the resolution itself? I would then be completely trapped in a logical hall of mirrors: unable to either follow it or break it! Anyway, I already broke with tradition -- by getting a different result from the Flea. His result was revolutionary! [CONFIDENTIAL NOTE to Nicholas only: I promise not to break stuff if you promise not to beat me, OK?] But -- in the most astonishing result of all today, I got exactly the same numerical score as the Flea in the "Are you a blogaholic?" test now making the rounds: 76 points is in the 51 through 80 percent "Still manage to have a social life," huh? (Little do they know.....) The Blogaholic test I found through Charles Hill BEFORE I saw it at Ghost of a flea. What that means is that my score could not possibly have been contaminated by my having already seen the Flea's results. It also means that Charles Hill is probably less crippled by this insidious, vicious disease which can strike anyone dumb enough to imagine that he can "handle it." (I can quit any time, of course....)
Doesn't that Skittles picture look like a float from the Mummers Parade? posted by Eric on 01.02.04 at 10:42 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/644 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Even sweet addictions allow no breaks!:
» Random quizes from ShortDaddy
As this is the first post of 2004, let me wish you all a Happy New Year. Hopefully this year will treat all of us well. As I’m waiting for things to process I thought I’d go see what quizes... [Read More] Tracked on January 3, 2004 03:02 AM
Comments
Hey, no fair being psychic! Who told you about my futuristic vacuum tubes? Eric Scheie · January 3, 2004 02:06 AM |
|
December 2006
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2006
November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Laughing at the failure of discourse?
Holiday Blogging The right to be irrational? I'm cool with the passion fashion Climate change meltdown at the polls? If you're wrong, then so is God? Have a nice day, asshole! Scarlet "R"? Consuming power while empowering consumption Shrinking is growth!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
"Worst of all, what if the resolution is interpreted as a command to break the resolution itself? I would then be completely trapped in a logical hall of mirrors: unable to either follow it or break it!"
I am imagining you repeating this as sparks and smoke are flying out of your futuristic vacuum tubes. James T. Kirk is standing nearby.