Downsizing Detroit by means of eminent domain

When we think of eminent domain, normally we think of the government taking private land in order to put it to public use, although the controversial (and incorrect, IMO) Kelo decision expanded the concept to include government takings for private use -- if that private use can be said to improve a city's tax base.

What's being proposed for Detroit, though, is a new wrinkle. The mayor wants to condemn private property in areas that the city deems too sparsely populated, and the reason given is that it's inconvenient for the city to continue offering government services. So eminent domain is not being used to help the city grow, but to shrink the city.

For downsizing. Eminent domain expert Alan Ackerman explains:

There are areas of the city where 60 to 80 percent of the area is vacant. There are areas with three houses instead of the 150 they used to have. In those areas, the same costs exist to put the water and sewer in the neighborhood. The police still have to drive there. This mayor needs to find out if he can buy these homes at fair market value and move them to areas that are still viable and have a higher density of homes. If there is a higher density, then it is a lot easier for the utility companies to go there. What you need to do is figure out how to treat people fairly and do it constitutionally. The state constitution will allow the city to acquire individual homes by eminent domain. However, the state statute is more restrictive than the constitution. You have to allow the city to remove homes that are shown to be blighted or worthy of condemnation.
I'm not sure about the assumption that once the government buys up the remaining homes in shrinking neighborhoods and tears them down, the police won't have to drive there. Will they be "closed"? What's to stop criminals from going there and hiding, camping out, and using them as bases of crime to better prey on surrounding areas? The people promoting these utopian schemes like to talk about using the land for urban farming, and "daylighting" old creeks and restoring the land, but with the land still there and still part of Detroit, the police are going to have to police it. Who will protect the people who tend these "urban farms"?

I'm skeptical. And what about the people who just want to live in perfectly good homes where they have lived for years? It isn't their fault that the surrounding houses were abandoned, vandalized, or burned. They paid their taxes, and now the government that has been taking their money all these years wants to take their houses because they are suddenly deemed inconvenient. I would think that they should at least allow people to opt out of being bought out. There's just something about the government saying, "we can't offer you services any more so we want your house" that I find offensive in the extreme. Like "we can't protect you, so get out!"

Why not allow people the option of signing a waiver agreeing to be on their own and take their chances? Besides, many of these Detroit houses are worth next to nothing, so paying 125 percent of next to nothing is a travesty.

I realize that few people care about Detroit, but if they can do this there, they can do it anywhere.

Hey, how about let's demolish suburban neighborhoods to prevent sprawl?

posted by Eric on 06.27.10 at 04:32 PM










Comments

next year try to get the g20. the anarchists can finish the job

newrouter   ·  June 27, 2010 9:00 PM

Is there not some way for the city of Detroit to basically "un-annex" an area, which would then become an unincorporated area of Wayne County? I am guessing that a historical search would show Detroit annexing either former cities or villages, or unincorporated townships. A reversal might be worth pursuing.

CBI   ·  June 28, 2010 11:07 AM

Yes it will bother some people when their old neighborhood vanishes. Mine did, taken for an air force base expansion many years ago. But the neighborhood was already deteriorating, the original community had died or moved away, the stores had closed, the theater, the high school had merged with one miles away.

When a neighborhood has all but vanished anyway razing is probably the way to go. Mayor Bing is making the right sounds about improving Detroit. That is now any almost hopeless task and no one should think the city will return to its industrial importance.

In fact the idea of keeping or rebuild Detroit as it was has been a large cause of its ruin as all sorts of government schemes have mostly rewarded public employees and building contractors. They created impressive facilities which proved commercially senseless.

KTWO   ·  June 28, 2010 5:55 PM

Post a comment


April 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits