|
June 29, 2010
All politics is local. But how local is local?
While I have absolutely zero sympathy for corrupt public officials (see my extensive posts about the scandals surrounding Philadelphia's Mayor Street), I find myself wondering why it is that the entire Michigan electorate should be forced to step in and wipe the asses of the voters of Detroit. At least, that's my take on this fall's ballot initiative: LANSING -- Michigan voters will decide in November whether former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and former Detroit City Councilwoman Monica Conyers -- or any other local officials convicted of violating the public trust -- should be banned from public office for 20 years.There is little question that Detroit's corruption is immense, and legendary. But considering that people like Kilpatrick and Conyers get elected and reelected, even though the voters supposedly have free choice, doesn't this suggest that the problem lies deeper than corruption only on the part of its leaders? Take Conyers' husband, for example. (Or as Henny Youngman would say, "PLEASE!") An annoying article in Sunday's Free Press (headlined "House icon Conyers steers clear of his wife's troubles") took such a softball approach to Conyers as to be obviously (IMO) bending over backwards. But even the Free Press had to admit that Conyers has at least the hint of an appearance of an aroma of what might politely be called a conflict of interest: WASHINGTON -- U.S. Rep. John Conyers was cloistered in his office.Could be? Let's not be too harsh or judgmental! I mean, being the "chairman of the committee that oversees the prosecutors who extracted a guilty plea from his wife on corruption charges" is, like, perfectly OK. No way that anyone could possibly be influenced by his position, is there? And the voters don't mind, do they? After all, most of the objections to Conyers come from outside of his district (and all those mean pundits and bloggers): Sometimes, Conyers' off-the-cuff remarks have stirred the pot in Washington's political hotbed. For example, while speaking at the National Press Club last year, Conyers addressed the complexity of national health care reform legislation being debated.I'm relieved that he will ensure that staff knows it is "not to take care of his personal affairs or work on campaigns on government time." How dare they have done such a thing, when they knew they shouldn't have! It was all the staff's fault! And despite her rather generous salary, his wife seems to be just as poor as many of her Detroit constitutents: His wife got a court-appointed lawyer despite his salary of $174,000 a year.(Not to mention her own city council salary....) I might be wrong, but I have a feeling that if I made that much money a year (which I don't), I wouldn't get a court-appointed lawyer -- especially if I was accused of taking bribes! Last year it came to light that Conyers, in 2007, wrote a letter in support of a controversial waste well that his office had previously raised concerns about. Federal prosecutors alleged that Monica Conyers, then on City Council, pressured the well's prospective owner, Jim Papas, to hire her aide, Sam Riddle, as a consultant at about the same time Conyers sent the letter.Sam the Bagman Riddle is of course another local legend in Detroit's corruption game, and only after a second trial (thanks to an earlier racialized mistrial) was he finally convicted. But I am glad the Free Press saw fit to mention Riddle. I also liked this quote from Michael Barone: "It's sort of bizarre for the chairman of the Judiciary Committee to be the spouse of someone convicted of a felony."It's also sort of bizarre for the voters of Michigan to be having to tell the voters of Detroit that they can't vote for her for twenty years. Otherwise, she'd probably be as politically untouchable as her husband, who is about to be reelected to his 24th term: Conyers is running this summer for his 24th two-year term in Congress, and he has no Democratic challenger in an overwhelmingly Democratic district.I guess that means that a Republican might try to unseat Conyers against 10 to 1 odds. Who would ballsy enough (or fool enough) attempt such a thing? Really, it's almost as ballsy as it was for Mickey Kaus to run against Barbara Boxer! As a Democrat! (Recognizing the near-impossibility of achieving success in such a venture, Glenn Reynolds stressed "the importance of having fun.") I had to look elsewhere to find out who Conyers' obviously fun-loving Republican opponent might be. According to the Examiner, it's either Pauline Montie Hmmm.... Even though I'm skeptical about getting all of the voters of a state embroiled in local politics, still. If the state voters can ban local officials convicted of violating the public trust -- from public office for 20 years, then why shouldn't they also subject their office-holding spouses to a special state-wide referendum? Why not? It would be more democratic because more people would be voting, and it would be certain to increase voter turnout, and above all, it might make the election more fun. Certainly, anything would be more fun than seeing Conyers overwhelmingly reelected to a 24th term. posted by Eric on 06.29.10 at 11:33 AM |
|
July 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Happy 4th! Go pursue happiness!
The Reason I Come And I Go Is The Same July 4th Bikini Edition 2010 Is Up Guns don't kill people, but ideas do? Politically Incorrect Psychopathy in the newz Your lifestyle stems from a Communist plot to destroy America! "But I was just dialing!" We Are Going To Whip These Communists Out Of Their Boots Men, get over your "macho culture"! Seeing the doctor is a must!
Links
Site Credits
|
|