|
February 02, 2009
How Government Killed Solar
It looks like the solar bubble is about to burst. Bringing an end to eight consecutive years of growth, global revenue for photovoltaic (PV) panels is expected to drop by nearly 20 per cent in 2009, as a massive oversupply causes prices to decline.Now here is where the story gets good. "Supply and demand were already unbalanced in 2008 with 100 per cent more modules produced than installed," said Dr. Henning Wicht, senior director and principal analyst, photovoltaics for iSuppli. "The short-term boost in demand from Spain and Germany kept installation companies busy and solar orders and module prices high. But this boom is over. In 2009, average prices for panels for new installation contracts will collapse to the $2.50 to $2.75 per watt range by the end of 2009, down from the current level of $4.20 per watt. The average price for the year will be $3.10 per watt."Get that? Solar is not an energy market. It is a political market. And once the political capital is gone the money dries up. The only way to make solar a real market is to get the cost below that of alternatives or provide advantages that outweigh the extra cost. Take solar garden lights. Their advantage even if they cost more than the alternative is ease of installation. But to move massive quantities of solar they are going to have to come down to the $1 a watt range - installed. That means cells costing 50¢ a watt. We have a ways to go for that. The nice thing is that we are now in striking distance, in the home stretch. It is no longer several orders of magnitude of cost reductions required. Just a factor of four or five. We will probably cover that ground in 5 to 15 years. Depending on whether we have to grind out improvements or we get lucky. Ah. But all is not lost. Maybe an American politician will come to the rescue. U.S. President Barack Obama on Wednesday (Jan. 28) met with business leaders to discuss the economic stimulus bill.I think he should have said "saw". With production better than 2 1/2 times demand I can't see the need for a lot of new production capacity at this time. And why does the government need to pour money into this technology? Because at current prices it is an unsustainable industry. Cross Posted at Power and Control Why hasn't Polywell Fusion been funded by the Obama administration? posted by Simon on 02.02.09 at 01:17 PM
Comments
Why hasn't the current occupant given any support to polywell fusion? Because fusion is NUCLEAR energy, and as we all know NUCLEAR energy is made by Sauron. Trimegistus · February 2, 2009 07:01 PM Hello, Owner. SonyaSunny · February 3, 2009 08:43 AM I kinda cringe when I hear that we need to "do more" to support development of alternative energy. How much is enough? Aren't we spending around 50 billion dollars a year on alternative energy subsidies? If the product were a "beer warmer" how much money would you spend on its development? I mean, the "perfect" beer warmer. Costs a nickel to produce and you can sell it for a dime. Warms beer from a chilly 33 degrees to 74 degrees in fifteen seconds. It's light, it's portable, it's durable. The only problem is, nobody wants one. But in today's world, if you can sell it as a good idea, you'll get millions of dollars in federal support. If your beer warmer is powered by alternative energy. Oregon is a "leader" in alternative energy. Here's a presser from our Unagovernor: Just take a look at the massive investment in land and equipment to produce a mere smidgen of the power demanded. Could I have engineered a more cost effective solution? Sure. And it would have required three conductors. Cost? Thousands. Maintenance? Minimal. How many employees does it take to keep conductors conducting? Well, gee, in the first year I'd suppose that cost would be pretty close to zero. Same in years 2 to twenty. How much was the clean-up after our last winter storm? How much grime needs to be deposited before there's a ten percent reduction in output? Twenty? How many cells were damaged and replaced? Or, three wires. This is the new technology you want us to adopt? (Madness.) Ring around the rosie, indeed. OregonGuy · February 3, 2009 01:11 PM One shame is how Silicon Valley's venture capitalist have given up on market-pleasing innovation and now have descended into rant rent-seeking. Lately, guys like Al Gore have joined the boards of some VC biggies and are pouring money into "alternative energy," all in the hopes of have government MANDATE a market for their investments. Whitehall · February 6, 2009 02:14 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
February 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
February 2009
January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The times they are a changin'
Mothers Drugging Newborns Tax Breaks For The Rich Teaching Without Teachers The $20 Laptop Unacceptable Risk Interesting Power Supply Company my topological quest for a Southern North Direct Democracy Sex More Weeks Of Winter
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Is this not the promise made, support for the unsustainable and increased tax for the sustainable.
One two three and we all fall down