|
May 01, 2007
Mental illness plus resentment turns deadly
Another deranged mental case went on a shooting spree in a Kansas City shopping center. This time, thanks to the presence of armed police, he was shot dead after killing only two people. It barely merited a mention in today's Inquirer, and the story doesn't reduce itself to easy stereotypes -- especially the "how did he get a gun" part. That's because the man was a fired security guard who had worked at Target (the target of his attack): David Logsdon's life was a disaster. His mental health was fraying; his finances were a mess.He was determined enough to "get even" that even after being shot by police, he still managed to drag himself to his former place of employment: On Sunday, the bleeding Logsdon limped through the mall, the rifle in his hands, dead and wounded in his wake. The Target store was ahead.Thank God someone was armed, and thank God these things don't happen more often. After a shooting incident in the news decades ago, I was meeting with a professor at UC Berkeley, who sighed and then sarcastically quipped, "I suppose the next thing that will happen is that I'll be shot for giving a student a C." We had a good laugh. Because such things were considered funny then. It isn't funny now, because times have changed. It's entirely conceivable now that just as a high school teacher can get his neck broken for taking away an ipod, a professor might very well be shot for giving a student a C. Obviously, this man was deranged, and the family tells the now-familiar tale of how they tried to get him help but couldn't: From all that is known about the murderous spree at Ward Parkway mall, it would seem obvious that the gunman, David W. Logsdon, was deranged.The problem is that even if a family manages to persuade a court to commit their relative (not an easy thing) the mental health facilities don't want to keep them: "There is no guarantee that they will be kept for 96 hours," said Jackson County Circuit Judge Kathleen Forsyth. "Doctors can let them out any time. Sadly, there is no guarantee they'll even let them in. Many times the hospital is full up."There's no money, and this is on top of a built-in bias against holding anyone, for anything. Which means that instead of the old-fashioned guys-with-nets-and-straitjackets, it all comes down to the cops: Without an individual's cooperation it is nearly impossible to get a loved one mental health care they may desperately need. Friends, neighbors or family members can try to initiate a 96-hour commitment. It requires at least two people to swear out affidavits and present them in probate court.The case underscores the recent debate about the state of mental health care prompted by the Virginia Tech shooting. Dr. Helen and Neo-neocon (both psychologists) have discussed the problem in detail, as has Clayton Cramer. (I've also written a couple of posts on the recent subject, and on the general issue.) I have to say, I think Susan Crain Lewis's focus on "the right to be as odd or weird as you want" misses the point by blurring the distinction between eccentricity and mental illness. Part of the problem is the medicalization of nearly everything, and the notion that we are all mentally ill. Neuroses and borderline "illnesses" like "ADHD," "OCD," and "codependency" are indistinguishable from paranoid schizophrenia, and the message is that we should all just be taking our meds. How is a truly crazy and dangerous person to be distinguished from an odd or weird person? And what about someone with a clearly unreasonable grudge or grievance which becomes an obsession? A normal student would not shoot a professor for giving a student a C, and a normal high school student wouldn't break his teacher's neck for taking away his ipod. But what is normal? I sometimes wonder whether there has been a quantum shift in the way people hold grudges, and take things as offenses to be avenged. Not that this is new. America was once more of an "honor-based" culture in which dueling was the norm, and grudges were settled at gunpoint. I may be wrong, but I don't think a fired employee or a student given a low grade in the old days of "honor culture" would have seen these things as questions of honor to be settled with violence. More likely, they'd have thought that they were at fault. I mean, if you're a student, your grades are your responsibility, right? Where would anyone get the idea that it's the teacher's fault? By reinventing "honor" that went by the wayside? (Now that we are all honor students, where is true honor to be found?) Resentment is a common enough feeling, but when it is coupled with mental illness and a sense of entitlement, it can be very dangerous. I've noticed that in day-to-day situations, even people who aren't crazy show a lot more resentment than they used to, and are perceiving personal attacks in the most innocuous situations, and I sometimes wonder if it's my imagination, or if there's been some sort of change in attitudes, but it seems that resentments are on the increase. I'll give one teensy anecdotal example. If you order a drink and it's loaded with fruit flies, you send it back, right? Getting another one ought to be a simple matter, right? This happened to me, and the waiter took the fly-filled drink back to the bartender and set it down on the bar. Instead of just fixing another one, the bartender (a very young woman) became totally enraged, and stared at the drink and the flies -- as if its very contents were an accusation of wrongdoing. I had not noticed her before, but she damned well noticed me (I guess the waiter told her who sent the drink back), and she fixed me with a look of death. Had I been her boss, I'd have wanted to fire her on the spot. Whether that would have been a good idea, I guess, depends on whether she is mentally ill or has an angry, grudge-holding boyfriend. Normally, such a trivial incident would be so silly as to not be worth mentioning. But haven't people been killed for less? (I guess I should be glad we're not yet a nation in which everyone is a mentally ill "honor student.") UPDATE: Don't miss Clayton Cramer's post on this subject, along with this post on a deranged gunman who shot up a "gun free zone." And via Glenn Reynolds, Bernard Harcourt (whose paper Cramer cited before) has carefully researched the deinstitutionalization/crime ratios. Glenn Reynolds also linked Harcourt's earlier post, in which the bottom line is this: Aggregated institutionalization is the best predictor of homicide rates. In studying the prison today, we need to aggregate mental hospitalization and prison rates.As Harcourt notes, however, it can be tricky to read the numbers, as the crime rate drives the institutionalization rate. There is always common sense, though. People who are institutionalized are unable to commit crimes on the outside. posted by Eric on 05.01.07 at 09:00 AM
Comments
About the bartender's rage-- As many commentators have noted, we are becoming an increasingly narcissistic society, comprised of individuals whose world view is that s/he is the center of the center of all that really matters. So far, that's just simple slefishness, but the narcissistic psychosis is not only do John and Jane Doe think they are the center of their universes, they think they should be the center of your universe, too. A side effect, which you encountered in the bar, is that such persons believe themselves to be above criticism. Donald Sensing · May 1, 2007 12:24 PM I think you touched on an important source in your commentary: People are being trained (by the Public Education System, imo) to believe that their failures are someone else's fault. - Didn't make the varsity team? Coach's fault. Many things in our society are being blamed on points outside the person. Hence, when things don't go as desired, the person looks for someone *else* to blame. I think that because this isn't the real source of the problem, it creates a frustrating situation (emotionally) and a person's rage can quickly get out of control. Imagine if a populace were unable to effect policy by voting. Would they not turn to violence? Well, similarly, if you think the customer should just accept the drink and they are at fault if they reject it, then you may resort to violence to get the customer to accept the drink - or accept responsibility for it not being acceptable. _Jon · May 1, 2007 02:13 PM Although there is no doubt in my mind that the public education system, which seems to value improving self-esteem over nurturing personal responsibility, is to blame for some of this, I have a question. Why the hell did he get a ticket for letting his lawn get too overgrown? Jon Thompson · May 1, 2007 08:41 PM The point of the "breaking his 20 round magazine" line was to point out that he had a 20 round magazine and therefore, this was an assault weapon being used. Phelps · May 3, 2007 11:55 AM >>Why the hell did he get a ticket for letting his lawn get too overgrown? Overgrown areas harbor mice, rats & snakes. If it's bad enough, it becomes a menace to everyone around it. A friend used to work at a Sonic that had a vacant lot near it. The lot was overgrown and the vermin came to the Sonic and nearby apartment dumpsters for food. The manager finally got the city to clean the lot since the owner wouldn't. gingeroni · May 3, 2007 05:49 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2007
April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A choice with a weird echo
Military Censorship There oughta be a law! My endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive arguments.... about endlessly incestuous and endlessly repetitive topics.... To some people, freedom is a leaky pipe Racist history of dog control? Different standards for different "communities"? Global War On Jihad the noisy silence of precautionary principles Mental illness plus resentment turns deadly
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I sincerely doubt that he "[broke] the 20-round magazine on his rifle" by collapsing on a kiddie ride. And that really doesn't add anything to the story. Did the writer put that in there to suggest that this goober was effectively unarmed and unable to wreak further havoc? Pardon me for being suspicious, but "journalists" have an obvious bias against legal guns, but ironically, FOR the criminals who illegally use guns.