|
February 02, 2007
James Lileks and the irrational hatred of perfect strangers
What is hatred? I think of it as a strong, overpowering emotion, which often blinds people to reason. Hating people you don't know is often a sign of bigotry, but not always. If I say that I hate John Wayne Gacy or Ted Bundy, I'm not really expected to know them. Just know of them. Likewise, many people hate Nazis and Communists in a general sense, and this is not thought of as bigoted. But as far as hating a specific person who's a total stranger, that's hard for me to do -- even if everything I have read about the person fills me with revulsion, and even though I think it might be hatred, it's a little illogical for me to claim that I actually hate someone I don't know. Ward Churchill and Cindy Sheehan fill me with loathing, but I cannot honestly say that if I got to know them personally, that I would actually hate them personally. Pandagon's Amanda Marcotte (of John Edwards campaign fame) complains that James Lileks hates Elissa Terris, a "perfect stranger" at whom Lileks "t[ook] a swipe [...] for no discernible reason." Ms. Marcotte quotes Lileks (the latter quoting from and commenting on the Times): Anyway. It's nice that the people who don't want to get married don't feel pressured to be married; if they're happy, they're happy, and no one's hurt. But it's the free-to-be-me vibe coupled with the when-I-grow-old-I-shall-wear-purple stuff that gets embarrassing. The gentleman should buy a telescope, identify the star responsible for his luck, and thank it.To Marcotte, this makes Likeks guilty of "irrational hatred": Apparently Lileks was blustering when he said no one is hurt; the anti-marriage decision of a 59-year-old Georgia woman hurts him to the bone for him to say something like that. How dare she not be married! She's older than Lileks. He hungers for her and everyone like her to be the living embodiment of his nostalgia, to be examples of how people Back Then had it together so that he can point to them and complain about how the rest of us have strayed from the Garden. And indeed, this is roughly is explanation of why he has this irrational hatred towards Elissa Terris, who he doesn't know. That, and of course the perennial male entitlement.The perennial male entitlement? Of course? If it's so obvious, why haven't I seen it crop up in his blog or his books? So, I thought I should examine the irrational hatred that James Lileks is said to have for Elissa Terris. How can Ms. Marcotte be so sure he hates her? While what he said could be characterized as snarky, since when is it hateful to say a man was lucky to have been rejected by a woman who obviously didn't want to be married and brags about her single status? How does that indicate hatred of the woman, much less an irrational hatred? And what about the two paragraphs that follow immediately in Lileks' post. Does this sound like hatred? "Marriage kind of aged me because there weren't options," Ms. Terris said. "There was only one way to go. Now I have choices. One night I slept on the other side of the bed, and I thought, I like this side."Not always good news? Hateful? It sounds as if Lileks knew absolutely nothing about her, and was just engaged in social commentary based on the remarks of a woman who might as well have been named "Jane Roe." It seemed so unfair to level the charge of hatred at Lileks that eventually, my curiosity got the better of me. I wondered what I might be missing, and I wanted to know just who is Elissa Terris -- this woman James Lileks is said to hate? My first concern was whether she existed at all, because I couldn't find any listing for a "Terris" in Marietta, Georgia, or for that matter in the entire state of Georgia. However, it occurred to me that she might be the same Elissa Terris reported by CNN to be suffering from fibromyalgia in Georgia in 1996: Samantha and her mother are a perfect example; Elissa Terris was diagnosed four years ago.Not only would be hard to hate this long-suffering victim of fibromyalgia, it would downright cruel. I suspect (assuming she's the same person) that if Lileks -- even if he's a war-loving hatemonger -- really knew the details of her medical background, he wouldn't hate her -- but he still might question the mental health of any man was who reported as proposing marriage to her. After all, what kind of neurotic wants to marry people who are nearly sixty and suffering from fibromyalgia? And if I put myself in Ms. Terris's position, she looked so worn out in the ten year old picture that just getting out of bed must have been an ordeal. If she's the same Elissa Terris as the one quoted in the Times, little wonder she enjoys the simple pleasure of being allowed to decide for herself which side of the bed to sleep on. Life with fibromyalgia is tough enough without having to take care of some ungrateful husband. But I should stop with the wisecracks, because this is all speculation, based on a character who for all we know might possibly be a pseudonym. Is it possible to hate a pseudonym? (George Harleigh, where are you?) Sure, there are the pictures, and they look similar. Here's CNN's 1996 Elissa Terris:
But wait! This mystery did not end with a picture. Might Elissa Terris the same Elissa Terris who is described as a Visions Facilitator and Operating Board Member of Visions Anew, the Divorce Resource for Women? She facilitates retreat seminars like the one in this flyer. Vision Anew is described as: "A support group that helps women going through divorce re-imagine life for themselves and their families."When I stumbled onto this, I wondered, could the happily divorced New York Times Elissa Terris possibly be the same as Elissa Terris, Board Member and group facilitator for the newly divorced? Shouldn't the Times article have pointed that out? I think divorce counseling (activism, perhaps?) is at least as relevant as what the reportorial team did point out: Elissa Terris, 59, of Marietta, Georgia, got divorced in 2005 after being married for 34 years and raising a daughter. "A gentleman asked me to marry him and I said 'No'," she recalled. "I told him, 'I'm just beginning to fly again, I'm just beginning to be me. Don't take that away'."Now, there's no way for me to know whether the Visions Anew board member and group facilitator is the same Elissa Terris as the fibromyalgia victim or the woman quoted in the New York Times. Perhaps there are three different Elissa Terrises -- all in Georgia, and all with different issues. I had given absolutely no thought to Elissa Terris until today, and that was only because I wanted to know who it was that James Lileks was accused of hating. However, it occurs to me that if the Times saw fit to discuss the details of Elissa Terris's life (including her return to school to get a master's degree, the photography classes and even auditioning for a play), that they might mention the fact that she was an Operating Board member of a professional non-profit organization dedicated to helping women with divorces, assuming that was the case. If she is the same person, why should it devolve upon a blogger like me who had never heard of her before to unmask her? Anyway, I don't know how long "Elissa Terris" has been a member of the Operating Board (the Google cache only goes back to January 15, but the original Times article is dated January 16) and she's been a facilitator there for well over a year. I cannot state for certain whether this is the same Elissa Terris. Something just seems fishy, that's all. Four people worked on the Times article, which remains important, widely-circulated, and much-discussed -- and which is still shaping the national debate on divorce. When I read the article, I got the distinct impression that the women quoted were just ordinary American women selected at random to aid readers in understanding the current national trend. Unless the reporters just happened to select a Board Member of a non-profit divorce counseling and retreat seminar center and never asked her, this begins to take on the aroma of calculated, partisan, reporting. (Dare I say deceptive?) None of this is to suggest that there's any reason for anyone to hate Elissa Terris (much less James Lileks, who I suspect does not hate her at all). But it might be nice to know whether she's a happily divorced, "perfect stranger" type housewife, or a professional divorce expert with some sort of concealed activist agenda. I hope she's the former, as I'm not terribly fond of activism, or concealed agendas. But I still wouldn't hate her. Besides, isn't there a rule that says "hate the concealed activism but love the concealed activist?" Concealed activists. Gotta love 'em! MORE: Via Glenn Reynolds, I see that Amanda Marcotte has deleted an embarrassing post without realizing that Google is forever. Why Edwards hired her is another mystery. Perhaps he should advise her that coverups don't work. posted by Eric on 02.02.07 at 07:42 PM
Comments
To stretch words beyond reason makes them useless. Hate, in my mind, is a very serious thing, a settled wish, if not intention, to see the hated object come to harm. Short of that, we can find attitudes ranging from mild distaste to visceral revulsion. They should not be classed as hate, unless your object is to obscure real distinctions. Bill Dooley · February 2, 2007 09:17 PM A splendid job. Yes, the activist fever swamps are where the MSM get most of their just-plain-folks for interviews. Scratch a New York Times culture hero/ine, find a raving ideologue. Bleepless · February 2, 2007 11:02 PM Hey, thank you all! This was just one of those things where I had a funny feeling something wasn't right, so I kept looking, and one thing led to another. Eric Scheie · February 3, 2007 12:50 AM Eric, you are priceless. Don't ya just love the internet? Can't get away with "stuff" anymore. Of course we've got to get everyone hooked up, and then point them your way. (smile) Maggie45 · February 4, 2007 09:10 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I don't know how you manage to do all of the research and thinking and writing that you do, but you really do it well. This (and most of your writing) is insightful and funny. In fact, it is insightfully funny. You are required reading every day. Thanks.