|
November 07, 2006
Voting in defense of adulthood
I just voted, and the only tussling I had with my conscience (touched on in a previous post) was whether to vote for Rick Santorum or Bob Casey for Senate. Sean Kinsell wrestled with this too, and decided to vote for Casey. I agree with much of Sean's analysis, and in all honesty, my vote could have flipflopped either way. In fact, I was going to vote against Santorum before I was going to vote for him, but when I went into the polls I saw the "straight Republican" button. (A hot button, to be sure.... But how straight is a hot button?) Anyway, before I'd had full time to reflect on the Santorum implications, I'd pushed that hot, straight Republican button, and then I heard a little electronic trilling noise, the curtain opened, and the closet was laid bare. While I always experience what feels like "buyer's remorse" after voting, I'll try to explain what made me push the button with so little hesitation. The answer lies in my daily morning dose of MSM. Not to knock the Inquirer (everyone in the Philadelphia area should subscribe), and there's nothing wrong with the way this piece is written, but the facts just supplied a reminder that often it's the little things that matter. The little thing was another school shooting: A Chester High School ninth grader has been arrested and charged with attempted homicide and other offenses for allegedly shooting a pistol into a crowd of students outside the high school from a school bus at the end of the school day Friday.I don't seek out stories like this, but it just so happens that for much of the weekend (on KYW traffic radio), I was unable to avoid hearing about the shooting, over and over again. At every news break, the radio would play the following angry question from a parent: It surprised me a lot because I don't believe this is happening, where are they getting these weapons from?Where are they getting these weapons from? Yes, it was accusatory in tone, as if she thought the guns were someone else's fault. It's one thing for a parent in denial to ask such a question, but I heard that scolding question repeated all weekend as "news." The scolding tone of the question was still on my mind when I opened the Inquirer this morning and read about the "gun with a filed-off serial number." Where are they getting the weapons? The posing of that question by an adult assumes that someone else should be overseeing "the children" who don't know any better, and are hapless victims of gun suppliers. Any idea how many felonies that gun with filed off serial numbers hidden in the kid's house might represent? Even if this had "just" been a school shooting, the question would have been woefully inappropriate. Not only is shooting someone an adult activity, but guns with filed-off serial numbers are deliberate, carefully committed adult offenses. Yet you won't hear a question like "Why are they stashing guns with filed off serial numbers in their parents' homes?" being asked. It certainly wouldn't get much radio play. I know, it's just a little story, another minor school shooting. Committed by a wholly innocent child who had "a gun with filed-off serial numbers" stashed at his parents' house. But for me it just served as yet another daily reminder there are a lot of people who don't believe in such a thing as individual responsibility and who would treat all people like children. (A child is an adult is a child.) Much as I might abhor this mindset, those who share it would rule my life. It's why I voted Republican. Not that there's a huge difference in philosophy, but in balance, I think there's more of an acknowledgment of the right to be treated like an adult in the Republican Party, but barely. That plus support for the war. (Again, barely.) But what about the Republicans who believe in treating citizens like children? (Arguably, Santorum falls into that category.) Those who would treat us like children deserve to be treated as children, and children don't deserve to hold office, right? The problem with that is that this election is so close that it isn't about candidates. It's about which party gets to put people on what the president's father called "these committees": "It is more than party vs. party," Bush said. "It is the idea that if we have some of these wild Democrats in charge of these committees, it will be a ghastly thing for our country. They just have a very different view of looking at the United States of America. They will be pushing for all kinds of crazy legislation; they will be issuing subpoenas."This "very different view of looking at the United States of America" not only includes treating adults like children, it also includes an inabilty to fully appreciate the dangers posed by an enemy which treats adults like children. I think this inability is the inevitable result of the condescending doctrine known as "identity politics" which, by failing to recognize the dignity of the individual, treats adults as children. While it's a close call in certain individual races, in balance, I voted against this "very different view of looking at the United States of America" in order to vote against being treated like a child. posted by Eric on 11.07.06 at 08:43 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|