|
September 18, 2006
We are in heaven because we kill you!
But maybe I should apologize for the title of this post, because it might be taken as implying that Islamic extremists are violent. This article on the Pope's apology (by Ian Fisher of the New York Times) appeared on the front page of today's Philadelphia Inquirer, but it is nowhere at their web site. Considering a similar disappearance (or non-appearance) yesterday, I'm wondering what is going on. (Anyone know?) Anyway, I'm fascinated by the issue of whether the Pope has been apologetic enough: In Egypt, a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which had been critical of the pope, initially said Sunday that the pope's remarks represented a "good step toward an apology." But later comments from the group seemed to cast doubt on whether it fully accepted the pope's statement.Considering that it's still open to question whether or not the Pope has really and truly expressed contrition for what some people think he said, I'm thinking about other apologies that might be in order if we apply the same logic. Perhaps the UN can apologize for even contemplating military action against a Muslim country. [Via Glenn Reynolds.] I mean, I know it's not going to happen, but still. The very idea of stopping genocidal atrocities in a country run by Muslim extremists! Doesn't that imply that they might be violent?Maybe an apology is in order for reporing that Sudanese Islamists raped little boys. Whoever wrote that report should apologize! And this report. Yegads! A mosque/madrassa accused of promoting violent jihad -- right in my neighborhood! Perhaps I should apologize to the local madrassa for writing a blog post pointing out that they sponsor jihad camps. The Wall Street Journal opined that in Europe, the governments have not only learned how to apologize, but how to run their governments on an apologetic basis: Europe is home to a new class of dissidents. In this era, their oppressor is not the Soviets, but radical Islam.Well, couldn't she have apologized! I mean, if she apologizes, she might be forgiven, but doesn't she know what happens to those who won't apologize? Speaking out about Islam can carry mortal risks, as was brought home in late 2004 by the gruesome murder on an Amsterdam street of Theo van Gogh. Van Gogh had made a film about Islam's treatment of women together with Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali. In May the Somali-born Ms. Ali left the Netherlands for the U.S., citing safety concerns.I'm thinking maybe the Dutch and U.S. governments should issue preemptive apologies for -- what's the right word? -- harboring these hateful people who refuse to apologize for saying hateful things. Why report any of this stuff? Can't it be taken the wrong way? Might someone think the Wall Street Journal promotes hatred of Islam or something? Because, I mean, the article continues, and Wall Street Journal didn't seem to be in the mood for apologies: Freedom of speech can't be taken for granted in Europe anymore. Take Necla Kelek, another prominent Turkish-born woman in Germany who has written about forced marriages and honor killings. She can speak in public only with police protection. Last May, Roger Köppel, the then editor of the German daily Die Welt, may have escaped an attempt on his life when a Pakistani student, armed with a knife, tried to enter his office building. Mr. Köppel's crime was to republish the Danish Muhammad cartoons, which have brought riots across the Middle East and death threats to publishers around Europe.I don't think it's "public indifference." I think it's fear. Better safe than sorry. Being safe means never having to apologize!
posted by Eric on 09.18.06 at 09:04 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|