|
April 23, 2006
Out mobbing the mobbers?
This piece on mobbing (via Glenn Reynolds) has not done much to renew my faith in the human brain: When a mobbing occurs, that spirit of openness gets strangled by groupthink, bent on someone's elimination.While Westhues' work has focused on academia-related workplace mobbing (something I've seen before), I think the phenomenon is a common human trait which tends to surface everywhere -- particularly in politics. What complicates mobbing in a political setting is the tendency of two "sides" to line up against each other, often in response to each other. Add to this the paradoxical American love of the "underdog," and politics devolves into a very strange (and very fickle) game of vying for victim status. When mobbing occurs in politics, the process is usually initiated by activists who hurl ad hominem attacks which would be called bullying in a workplace setting, but which are considered part and parcel of the normal political arena. If the target is a real bastard, this sort of mobbing can work, and the voters will ratify the attacks by voting against the vilified target. But what can also happen is that the activists forget that voters aren't activists, but normal Americans with a wholesome love of the underdog -- and a hatred for bullying. So instead of creating a monster or a demon, the mobbing can create victim status. And in politics, victim equals backlash. While it is too early to tell how it will go over with Pennsylvania voters in November, the vilification of Senator Rick Santorum has already reached such a fever pitch that it's made the front page of today's (Sunday) Inquirer: To fans, Santorum is a moral champion. To many on the left, however, he epitomizes intolerance and inspires contempt. For example, there are tens of thousands of references to "santorum and anal" on Google, including the lewd definition - which is the first thing that pops up when you search "santorum." And blogs are filled with brutal language about the senator. "He's garbage wrapped in skin," someone named Dethspud posted on the Drudge Retort this week, one of the few insults suitable for newspaper publication.Strong feelings invite hysteria, too. In addition to the effort to use Santorum's name to define certain sex acts, there's a group called Philadelphians Against Santorum which is sponsoring a Rick Santorum lookalike contest. And recently, a local gym was targeted for a boycott because its owner supported Santorum. In activist circles, the name "Santorum" seems to have become a synonym for eeevil and dirty: Polls, so far, show Santorum trailing his likely Democratic opponent, state Treasurer Bob Casey Jr., and give the incumbent low job-approval ratings.I'm not sure that conservative voter turnout is the only key to the election. But let's assume it is. If Santorum is behind in the polls, do maniacal personal attacks really make sense as strategy? I can't think of a better way to increase conservative turnout. And if the attacks get so loud as to be out of all proportion to the reality of Rick Santorum (who voiced sentiments shared by a sizeable minority of voters), ordinary non-activist voters might be shocked to be reminded -- notwithstanding their short memories -- that Santorum is surprisingly soft-spoken. Worst of all, Rick Santorum refused last summer to fire a gay aide. (The original Knight-Ridder story survives at Free Republic.) A picture of the gay aide (who is also black) appears here. Even more ominously, the gay Advocate.com reported that "Santorum's praise for his gay aide didn't dim the ardor of the senator's conservative supporters." (More here.) Fortunately for Santorum's aide, he wasn't outed in the heat of the election, although it might have fascinated voters to see a gay black man (or should that be "black gay" man?) "mobbed" in the name of gay rights. Political mobbers are probably too smart to do such a thing this summer. (As for me, I've never been a fan of Rick Santorum, but I'm a bleeding heart where it comes to victims of any mob.) posted by Eric on 04.23.06 at 10:46 AM
Comments
Re: So, in Pennsylvania... I submit that Blue State anti-conservative hatred is redirected racism. The "sundown town" mentality is, still, not far from the surface in the industrial Northeast. And when the next crisis hits, it wouldn't take much for this hatred to get redirected to the next target... David Ross · April 24, 2006 01:16 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Out here we have a similar situation. Diane Busby (D) vs. Brian Bilbray (R) for the rest of Randy Cunningham's congressional term in California's 50 Congressional District. Diane and Brian have been running positive campaigns, both touting their aim to be honest and forthright custodians of the people's interests in the House of Representatives. Bilbray, a former representative, even spotlights the time he defied Federal beauracracy by bulldozing sewage from Mexico so it wouldn't cross the border.
But then you have the National Republican Congressional Committe, who are running attack adds agains Busby, accusing her of taking bribes. Thing is, the RNCC is knowingly conflating bribes and campaign contributions. A willful confusion that could backfire on the RNCC should Democratic candidates start using the startegy on Republicans.
Bilbray and Busby are running clean campaigns. No attacks, real or spurious, on their opponent. But, not everybody is so considerate.