|
July 06, 2005
Wilder Days
It's still "Rose Wilder Lane Week" here at Classical Values. I hope you're as pleased reading these selections as I am presenting them. One thing I've noticed about "The Discovery of Freedom" is that no matter how many inaccuracies I find in it, none detract from the central argument. I hope the rest of you feel the same way. One thing that puzzled Mrs. Lane was the enduring obstinacy with which people cling to hurtful ways. Much that is hard in this life could be made easy, if only people acted less like themselves and more like saints. Her eventual conclusion was that people value certainty over results. They want to have explanations, not questions, and they will submit willingly to various types of Authority, and its discontents, to remain in that mental comfort-zone. Essentially, they put their faith in myths, some of which are more effective than others. Looking around today, I don't see much change. People believe what they believe, and won't thank you over-much for challenging their beautiful theories with ugly little facts. The simple notion that people are free, or ought to be, is still bitterly contested. Here's Mrs. Lane's once-over-lightly explanation of a popular superstition of her day... Spengler returns to the intangible Authority. He says the Authority is Civilization. He explains that a Civilization springs (is born? Or hatched?) from a changeless, formless, Never having read Spengler, I cannot vouch for how closely Mrs. Lane's sketch portrays his work. He may or may not have redeeming subtleties that she doesn't touch upon. I have read Toynbee however, who was allegedly influenced by Spengler, and the idea of civilizations as quasi-organic entities permeates his historical analysis. I think she's got their number. Certainly, I agree with almost all of the following... Of course, any American who is not an intellectual knows that this world is not inhabited by gigantic, invisible creatures called Civilizations. He knows that ordinary men and women, using their energies, make a civilization and keep on making it, every day, every hour, and that nothing but their constant, individual efforts can make a civilization and keep it existing. Here's a more personal, and poignant, illustration of how people can get it wrong. I'll take my leave here and let Mrs. Lane have the last word. The following anecdote takes place in 1928... When I was living in Albania I had a friend who was one of the finest persons I ever knew. He was an Italian of English ancestry. His mother and his maternal ancestors for many generations had been English. He was fourteen and his brother was nine, when their parents were drowned at sea. The boys had no other near relatives and from that time they were inseparable. They stayed together in schools and universities; they got from the King himself a special permission to do their military service together. They went together to Argentine, and in 1915 returned to join their regiment. posted by Justin on 07.06.05 at 12:57 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2529 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wilder Days:
» Cleaning Up the Corners from Tributaries
Had a long 4th of July weekend, and despite my own personal patriotic feelings, was not really in a celebratory mood. Much of it had to do with Ghosts, Ghosts ... [Read More] Tracked on July 6, 2005 05:09 PM
Comments
I must mention that a young woman at our high school reunion last week, Lydia Badillo, spoke of cycles and the rise and fall of civilizations. It was so good to hear such wisdom from another, so unexpectedly. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · July 11, 2005 07:16 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Spengler! Extremely interesting. Myself, I have always felt that Spengler had a deeper insight into the distinctive styles of the great civilizations, the high cultures, than did Toynbee. Spengler saw that each civilization begins with a distinctive vision of time, of space, of the Divine, and declines as it exhausts or loses that vision.
Spengler was right that history is not a straight line of "Progress" but instead takes the form of cycles, the rise and fall of civilizations. (Hmmm.... The feminine (encircling) over the masculine (linear)?....)
I do have to agree that he erred in the direction of fatalism and pessimism, but I prefer that to the complacency bred by the false doctrine of "Progress". Both negate the free will of the individual, which in my view is supreme above all. The Individidual striving for the Divine. The Ego in the Infinite. The total passion for the total height....