![]() |
|
![]()
July 10, 2005
What Bioethicists Don't Do...
Probably because C.S. Lewis and Star Trek are so much easier... Via the invaluable and tireless Reason at Fight Aging, comes this interesting news from Dr. Rafal Smigrodski... Today our team confirmed our previous preliminary data showing that we can achieve robust mitochondrial transfection and protein expression in mitochondria of live rats, after an injection of genetically engineered mitochondrial DNA complexed with our protofection transfection agent. A significant fraction of cells in the brain is transfected with this single injection even though we so far did not optimize the dose. This achievement has important implications for medicine: protofection technology works in vivo, and should be capable of replacing damaged mitochondrial genomes. Now why exactly is this interesting? Should you even give a damn? Well for starters, it's beginning to look as though mitochondrial failure is implicated in a number of our unpleasant biological failure modes. Yet, as with so many other of our systemic breakdowns, there hasn't been a great deal we could do about it. That may be changing. Here's Dr. Smigrodski... A few months ago I promised to post an article on mitochondria and aging which I was writing with Shaharyar Khan, and finally I can keep my promise. "Mitochondrial microheteroplasmy and a theory of aging and age-related disease" will be published in Rejuvenation Research in August. Here is the text (without figures) and I can send the pdf to anyone interested. Here is an extremely pared-down version of the above paper... We implicate a recently described form of mitochondrial mutation, mitochondrial microheteroplasmy, as a candidate for the principal component of aging. Microheteroplasmy is the presence of hundreds of independent mutations in one organism, with each mutation usually found in 1 - 2% of all mitochondrial genomes. Despite the low abundance of single mutations, the vast majority of mitochondrial genomes in all adults are mutated...We postulate that microheteroplasmy is sufficient to explain the pathomechanism of several age-associated diseases, especially in conditions with known mitochondrial involvement... So after all that you have a better idea why the following news is so very encouraging. ...protofection technology works in vivo, and should be capable of replacing damaged mitochondrial genomes... To my mind, this is the sort of thing that doctors should be doing with their time. You know, healing the sick, discovering cures? Leave Plato and Montaigne to the Bioethical Mandarins. posted by Justin on 07.10.05 at 01:36 PM
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Bioethicists Don't Do...:
» Human Innovation: Fixing your mitochondria from DownsizeDC.com
Hundreds of millions of years ago small psuedo-bacteria invaded more complex cells, beginning eons of bio-economic trade and eventual symbiosis – the permanent joining of two organisms into one. These invisible invaders are inside you right now, all th [Read More] Tracked on July 25, 2005 3:32 PM
Comments
This post is too scientific for me. The other post was more mythic. The 2 hemispheres of my brain? Wanda vs. Dawn? "Plastics." "Colors" or "Spectrums"? "The vertical members betoken the male, upright societal principles, providing overall structure and a firmly clasping support to the horizontal female elements, or shelves." Transcendental Science? C. S. Lewis and Aldous Huxley both died on November 22, 1963, the same day Lee Harvey Oswald (a Communist) assassinated President Kennedy. Conspiracy? Orange Lodges? The style of it all! Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · July 11, 2005 6:45 PM We need somebody who knows a lot more about science than I do to comment on this post. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · July 13, 2005 12:17 AM |
|
April 2011
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
April 2011
March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 Sarah Hoyt Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A knee sock jihad might be premature at this time
People Are Not Rational No Biorobots For Japan The Thorium Solution Radiation Detector From A Digital Camera Voter Fraud? This war of attrition is driving me bananas! Attacking Christianity is one thing, but must they butcher geometry? Are there trashy distinctions in freedom of expression? Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That's half of it. Now we just have to figure out how to prosper.