|
June 14, 2005
When performers fail to perform
The lack of interest that Steven Malcolm Anderson expressed about the Michael Jackson case reminded me of my own complete lack of interest until yesterday. What changed? Perhaps it was the realization that for once, a well orchestrated media circus backfired. Maybe "fizzled" is the right word. Picture yourself as an ordinary American on that jury. I might be wrong, but they sure looked like ordinary Americans to me. For God knows how many weeks they sat there day after day. (I didn't follow the case so I don't even know the amount of time involved.) And what did they see? A relentless media-created circus outside, with chanting protesters for and against Jackson, and a prosecutor who according to most of the accounts I've read, was doing his damnedest to try the case against Michael Jackson in the media. Why, I'd be willing to bet that after a while, the jury might have started to pity Jackson. After all, they knew that whatever their verdict, once it was over they'd get to pack up and go home. But Michael Jackson is forever mired in his own permanent media circus, only this one involves his stage-managed prosecution by the latest penis-waving ringmaster in one more media circus ring. On top of this, the jury is reminded that they are a jury, that there still exists the presumption of innocence, and a standard called "resonable doubt." Jackson's lawyer, of course, was apparently smart enough to do this in a low key manner -- which the media charged had been a "lackluster" performance. A huge "victory" was therefore awarded to the prosecution in advance of the verdict. The jury, however, obviously had what some might dare to call a smidgen of common sense: "I feel that Michael Jackson has probably molested boys," Hultman said on CNN. "To be in your bedroom for 365 straight days and not do something more than just watch television and eat popcorn, that doesn't make sense to me.The circus backfired all right. A jury that could recognize the distinction between actual guilt and the prosecutorial burden of presumption of innocence might well have been able to perceive that they were supposed to be more than performers in a circus. How dare they?
posted by Eric on 06.14.05 at 09:14 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2447 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference When performers fail to perform:
» A Normal-Looking Jury from The American Mind
From my brief look at the Michael Jackson jurists post-trial I don't think they were some braindead morons who would... [Read More] Tracked on June 15, 2005 12:03 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Dear Eric:
THANK YOU!!!! for the links. Bless you and Coco (and Puff, in Heaven).
Funny again, I've written much more interesting comments here in Classical Values, even only in the last day or two. That one was more or less a "nothing" comment, relatively speaking. As to my own Up With Beauty, yes, I do need to start writing in it again. We still have some memory problems, and we still haven't resolved my e-mail problems. At least, those who jump to that link will get to see what I've written so far on spectrumology.
Back to your post here: You are quite right about the prosecutor hamming it us for the media vs. Michael Jackson's defense attorney's low-key performance. That reminds me of what Camille Paglia remarked back during the election campaign of 2000, contrasting Al Gore's debate tactics vs. Bush's low-key performance: "This is like Zen!" The style of Camille Paglia!
You are quite right that I take no interest in the "celebrity" of Michael Jackson or in popular culture generally. But, by comparison, I can tolerate him far more than that other Jackson, the "celebrity" who goes around screaming that today's Negroes are still in the age of Jim Crow -- while deprecating Jews and homosexuals. What a fake, phony, fraud that politician (who has never yet, to my knowledge, been elected to any office) is.
More important than all of that: Be absolutely sure to read Dean Esmay's commentary on the Drudge Report. His style! The style of the very title of his post on that!