|
June 09, 2005
To hell with music!
After thinking over that last post, the manifest unfairness of singling out books for the carnage they've wrought began to get to me. After all, even if we grant for the sake of argument that books are dangerous, as I explained, the danger is limited by the number of people who can a) read, and b) understand what they read. Yet most of us can hear. So it would follow logically that things which can be heard are infinitely more dangerous than things which have to be printed and then read. Anyway, the more I thought it over, the more I realized how unfair it was to single out books as the greatest threat. So I hereby propose the "Classical Values Ten Most Harmful Musical Compositions of the 19th and 20th Centuries." I did some research (as you can see in the links), but I solicit reader input, because this is a very serious matter. As the saying goes, if we can save just one life..... My tentative votes, so far: 1. Rites of Spring (Stravinksy) The list could go on and on, and while I have tried to be non-partisan, my cultural bias may be showing. (Surely a lot of people would want to include The Star Spangled Banner?) A few runners up: What might I have I left out? Well, for starters, millions of people hold that ALL music is harmful, because it is haram. Here's a typical explanation of the problem: The case with music and unlawful singing is the same. It has been decisively prohibited in Shariah, as the evidences mentioned further along will show. Yet there are individuals that are not ready to believe that it is Haram.I'm in over my head! I surely can't be expected to compile a list of the most haram-ful music, can I? A task like that would be too large. I should try to think in terms of reasonable goals. posted by Eric on 06.09.05 at 08:40 AM
Comments
Ayn Rand, Communism's greatest enemy (next to Dawn and Norma), loved the Internationale. In We the Living she wrote: "....For the first time in Petrograd, Kira heard the Internationale. She tried not to listen to its words. The words spoke of the damned, the hungry, the slaves, of those who had been nothing and shall be all; in the magnificent goblet of the music, the words were not intoxicating as wine; they were not terrifying as blood; they were grey as dish water. That is style! Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · June 9, 2005 11:48 AM I humbly submit the entire catalogs of every band composed of four or five overly primped teenage boys (with honorable mention for every band composed of one beautiful teenage girl). byrd · June 9, 2005 11:54 AM Thank you Steven. Wagner must be added! Eric Scheie · June 9, 2005 12:11 PM Just off the top of my head, it's "Rite of Spring". That aside, I can't find anything harmful in it. Evidently, neither did Disney (in the '40s). The link, however, is a good resource on Adorno. For some unaccountable reason, the MHP has no entry for Gramsci, another front-line fighter in the battle against the Western Canon. Adorno on music is hard to read - as is almost any kind of Marxist art criticism. To paraphrase, if Adorno's agin' it, I'm for it. Mike · June 9, 2005 03:53 PM Ah, well, "The Star Spangled Banner" probably is safe by virtue of its music being 18th century. I'd nominate, however, "Stairway to Heaven" which took dirty, gritty, drink-a-beer, party-down rock 'n' roll and convinced its practitioners that they were really making "art." Callimachus · June 9, 2005 11:14 PM While I share this in jest it may very well be quite true, that the Riverdance soundtrack would be the most dangerous one that you have not listed. O.F. Jay · June 10, 2005 05:25 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I wrote my views on censorship and the power of ideas as deadly weapons in the post below. Music is most powerful, most deadly. That's why I love it. I can see why the Muhammadans ban it. Music is the highest expression of our Western ("Faustian") soul, and is therefore alien to the Muhammadan soul.
I haven't had the opportunity to hear either the Intenationale or the Horst Wessel March. I'd probably like them as music while hating what they advocated. I love Wagner even though he was an anti-Semite (which is one of the reasons why Nietzsche broke with him). The song I hate the most is Imagine, both for what it advocates and the music itself. (I don't consider (c)rap "music" to be music, it's just some idiot cussing at the top of his lungs, so it doesn't count.)
All this reminds me of Dawn's and Norma's Holy Music vs. Drug Music and the Conspiracy Behind the Conspiracy. Their style.