|
June 08, 2005
Machohomo v. Metrohetero?
According to this report, the "macho look" is making way for... for.... Well, for something else: PARIS (AFP) - Macho man is an endangered species, with today's male more likely to opt for a pink flowered shirt and swingers' clubs than the traditional role as family super-hero, fashion industry insiders say."Authority, infallibility, virility and strength" (all classical values, BTW) are, we are told, being replaced by looks like this: I don't know whether the above constitutes the "metro" look, but I flunked the metro test, and I don't know too many men who either look like that or want to. Like some of the bizarre women's fashions to which we're often treated, this is a look to which most men simply do not -- and will not -- aspire. Lest anyone think of blaming "the gay agenda" or launching another boycott as a way of fighting this sinister sissy plot, I think it's only fair to point out that for the most part, your average homosexual man is attracted to precisely the "macho man" look we are now told is doomed. Gee, what if that's part of the problem? Might it be, in a sort of perverse paradoxical kind of way? Might the "Metro man" be a "homophobic" reaction against the homoerotic "macho man"? I doubt it. I think most people would just like to be themselves. And I think it's all a little dull. But it's obviously not dull for everyone. Might be the sort of thing people like to get worked up about. There's money in this for someone somewhere (or at least a desire for attention) or they wouldn't be doing it. I think that even the blasted culture war should have better things to do. UPDATE (06/10/05): James Lileks has more: this is mostly nonsense. At least here in the US. Perhaps it’ll work in Europe, which has a large class of silly people inclinded to be is post- everything - post-national, post-religious, post-modern, post-gender. (It won’t work with the Muslim segment of their population, though.) It might work in America for a wee thin slice of the male population that lives in coastal cities, has the requisite vanity to carry it off, and is looking for a new role to replace the boring old Red State values he fled, seeking an enlightened place where people never say "Ozzie and Harriet" without rolling their eyes.Oddly enough, I find myself wishing it would work (with the Muslim side of the population, of course....) posted by Eric on 06.08.05 at 02:41 PM
Comments
To upholed his something, no doubt. Eric Scheie · June 8, 2005 06:09 PM I think it's an offshoot of the youth culture. Teenage girls don't like manly looking men because such men are scary. They like men who look like women- DiCaprio, Depp, even Brad Pitt before he started juicing, all look like teen idols- like that kid from the Partridge Family. As younger people define male beauty male beauty is defined as more feminine. Or maybe I'm just spiteful because I'm huge and hairy, lol. Harkonnendog · June 8, 2005 07:03 PM Speaking as someone who very occasionally wears suspenders, the thing that bothers me about that photo is the potential for facial injury if the clip lets go. wheels · June 8, 2005 08:17 PM Nope, aint gunna do it. Pass me a 6-pack and a carton of marbs, unfiltered. I need something to preoccupy myself till my 5lb steak is done 'aging' on the grill. mdmhvonpa · June 8, 2005 10:20 PM Now I remember where I saw that look ... Clockwork Orange. mdmhvonpa · June 8, 2005 10:21 PM Masculinity on its way out? That's what we were told in the 1970s. It hasn't happened yet -- except, all too obviously, in the milieu which these fops inhabit. There have always been fops and sissies, there have always been "macho" brutes, and there have always been real men. Same for the female equivalents. Authority, infallibility (hail to Pope Benedict XVI -- may he be another Pius IX!), virility, and strength -- the Classical Values -- will never go "out of style", for they sre style. You are quite right that male homosexuals gravitate toward real men. That's why I call them men's men. And Lesbians must love all that makes woman womanly and lovely. The Linear Angularity of Man. The Encircling Curvaceousness of Woman. The eternal polarity of the sexes. The eternal order of the Divine. Steven Malcolm Anderson the Lesbian-worshipping man's-man-admiring myth-based egoist · June 9, 2005 02:35 AM I'm not saying that there aren't effeminate homosexuals, mind you. Nor am I saying that I have any quarrel with them. It's just that they're not going to call the shots for most men, and I don't think they want to. Eradicating macho men is simply not in the interest of homosexuals -- neither the effeminate nor the masculine types. Eric Scheie · June 9, 2005 09:40 AM Oh wow, it's the Keebler Elf look. Suddenly bellbottoms look sensible. Isn't fashion wonderful? Raging Bee · June 9, 2005 11:25 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I don't know for fashion, but speaking as a straight woman, he's incredibly unsexy. My first thought was that someone had accidentally let him out of his institution.
Backward suspenders. Heh.