|
May 03, 2005
Federal welfare licensing?
I agree with Glenn Reynolds that this drivers license bill by Congressman Sensenbrenner (whose proposed drug laws I dislike even more) is unconstitutional. Yet I also agree that the merits of the law are good. As Glenn correctly asks, "why should illegal aliens be able to get drivers' licenses?" How then, to achieve the merits, but in a constitutional manner? How about listing the same desired drivers license criteria, but instead of commandeering states' drivers licensing, simply deny all federal welfare benefits to applicants whose drivers licenses (or state identification) don't live up to the desired federal standards? This would certainly render the substandard drivers licenses unattractive to illegal aliens, without commandeering state licensing, or even requiring states to to do anything. They could even keep their existing drivers licensing systems if they wanted to, which would allow citizens and non-citizens the right to drive, as well as enact a sort of automatic welfare reform for states wishing to opt out. The Alien Driver Welfare Reform Act? Why not? It would be good for the Constitution, promoting the general welfare and all that founding stuff. I guess that means it'd never pass.... UPDATE: More on the welfare connection here. (Via Jeff Percifield, who really does look like Jon Stewart.) UPDATE: Via an InstaPundit reader, it appears that tying the identification to welfare and other federal benefits is what the bill already will do. At least so it appears: If a state opted not to comply, its driver's licenses, even those issued to citizens and legal residents, would not be recognized as valid for federal identification purposes — such as boarding an airplane or opening a bank account. As a result, most states would probably adopt the new standards.The bill has not been finalized, but there's also talk of a two-tiered system: The latter is somewhat inconsistent with the former. Because if certain extra features are required for federal identification, that does not preclude other than standard identification which would nonetheless allow state driving. It's tough to analyze a statute which isn't there! MORE: According to the LA Times, ACLU legislative counsel Tim Sparapani suggests that people whose states' drivers licenses fail the federal standards would be completely out of luck: citizens of states that haven't made the changes won't be able to board a flight, take a train, enter a federal courthouse or even go to a Social Security buildingIsn't he forgetting about a thing called a U.S. Passport? (All that's required is proof of citizenship.) AND MORE: Did dilution of citizenship lead to the decline of Rome? For those wanting some classical perspective on this issue, I wrote this post over a year ago. Excerpt: The decline of Rome has been considered to include in its origin Caracalla's Constitutio Antoniniana -- which diluted the once-privileged status of Roman citizenship by conferring it to everyone in the Empire with the exception of slaves.(There's a lot more in the post, but I get bored by excessively repeating myself.) posted by Eric on 05.03.05 at 05:45 PM
Comments
Actually, I don't have a problem with driver licenses being given to anyone who is qualified to operate an automobile on thte streets. The problem I have is using a driver licensing system as a Universal Identity System. DLs were never supposed to be used as an ID (just like SS cards). End that, and this isn't an issue anymore. Phelps · May 3, 2005 08:55 PM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's putting the car before the horse. The US & the Bush administration still have their arms wide open for illegal immigration. So the result is de facto encouragement & reliance on illegal immigration, while telling these same illegals - who work their asses off & raise families here - they better find a way to live without driving. You try it.
Neither party wants to address the border situation for fear of offending the mythical Hispanic street