|
April 26, 2005
Vigilante: An ill-defined Spanish word . . .
As Darleen Click points out, semantics are being used to cloud the debate over illegal immigration -- with ordinary words being much misused: Read almost any story on illegal aliens and the MSM almost without fail refers to illegal aliens as "migrants" or "undocumented workers." The supporters and advocates of open borders engage in the war of words in an effort to reduce the public awareness that illegal aliens are breaking the law. The recent coverage of the Minuteman Project is a prime example of how semantics is used in attempts to give sympathy to criminals and criminalize law-abiding citizens.There is a clear double standard at work, and it reminds me of how police dispatchers treated me once when I reported a burglary in progress and told her I had a gun. Instantly, her tone changed and she started yelling at me! About the gun! This led to the fastest police response I'd ever had, which included the almost immediate arrival of detectives in suits in an unmarked car alongside the regular cruiser. "Where's the gun?" "Where's the gun?" was the only thing that mattered. The burglar was irrelevant, and it struck me that their primary purpose was not to arrest the burglar (or protect me), but to protect the burglar from me. (Next time, I might wait a little longer before dialing 911.) I find it interesting that Americans who are trying to turn illegal immigrants back are called "vigilantes," while their counterparts (groups like Grupo Beta) are seen as humanitarians: Agua Prieta, Mexico , Apr 20 - For the past eleven years, Enrique Enriquez Palafox has worked on the Mexican border, rescuing migrants in need of food and water. As an employee with Grupo Beta, a Mexican government-sponsored agency whose mission, "Protección a Migrantes," is stamped across the back of his jacket, Palafox is accustomed to the constant search for men, women and children lost in the 23 mile-long stretch of desert between the Mexican border towns of Agua Prieta and Naco.I guess if the "vigilantes" are "ignorant racists," the Grupo Beta people must be "intelligent multiculturalists." (If you like this sort of thing, reliable old Aztlan.net has more.) And WorldNetDaily features this Los Angeles billboard: What is being lost in this heated debate is that the people crossing the border illegally are by definition engaged in crime. The people trying to stop them may not ultimately be acting in the best interests of their own cause, but they are not criminals. (I don't mean to belittle anyone or sound overly cynical, but I know from experience that groups like the Minutemen attract agents provocateur like rotten meat draws flies. This "Mexican Family Values" portrayal might amuse my more cynical readership.) Whether they are in fact "vigilantes" is quite another matter. The term is not easy to define. Vigilantes regard the criminals and people they target as living outside the social bonds and communal ties that hold our society together. It's not so much that they dehumanize their target, but that the target represents an alien enemy that must be defended against. The target must also be punished, and punished outside the law. Any and all legal matters on the subject are seen as unnecessary intrusions on the basic freedom that all communities enjoy to protect themselves. Zimring (2004) says that the vigilante mindset is the opposite of the due process mindset. Vigilante thinking is precisely the opposite of any notion of fairness, fair play, or a chance for acquittal. Vigilantes do not care to wait for the police to finish their investigation, and they care less about any court's determination of proof. What they do care about is justice -- quick, final, cost-effective justice. To a vigilante, punishment should be inflicted upon those deserving of it at the first opportunity -- no waiting, and the more severe the punishment, the better. These are all romantic notions that feed an appetite for punishment more than an appetite for vengeance.The author argues that this type of vigilantism ultimately leads to criminal behavior. Yet I have seen no evidence that by attempting to shame the Border Patrol, the Minutemen are engaged in criminal behavior. What they are doing is theatrical and dramatic, but it's intended to be that way in order to get their point across. Unless they break the law, they simply aren't lawbreakers. (Similarly, when I grabbed a gun and called the cops, I got a lightning fast police response, but that was hardly vigilantism.) What bothers me is that the real problem -- an unpoliced border, with criminals crossing at will -- is being lost in a debate over "vigilantism." I mean, why have the border at all if it doesn't mean anything? And if it doesn't mean anything, it's fair for people to ask whether the laws of the United States apply. And where. UPDATE: La Shawn Barber reports vigilante-like talk from ultraliberal Maxine Waters: “Why isn’t anyone talking about the Mexican Mafia (a gang of illegal Mexicans that controls the California prison system)?” she thundered. ‘I don’t care if you’re pink or purple or white or black or brown, I want you out if you’re committing crimes.’ There is no excuse not to control the border, she said. ‘I’m a liberal with a capital ‘L’,’ she said, ‘but I’m sick of it.La Shawn ends with this dire warning to liberals: The point is that no matter how liberal people may be, everyone has a limit to what they’ll tolerate, and foreign criminals fighting in her district must be hers.Control the borders? Sounds like vigilantism to me! MORE: According to the Washington Times, the Minutemen are rallying this week in Washington. No word yet on whether Maxine Waters plans to address them. MORE: Glenn Reynolds, speculating about immigration as the Achilles Heel of the Republican Party, links to this: The party's base hates the president's stance on immigration, and this threatens to sunder the Republican coalition. I remain amazed that the instinct for self-preservation among the big-business and libertarian elements within the party is still so weak that don't understand their stake in controlling and reducing immigration.Support for border control transcends (and may be the Achilles heel of) both parties. posted by Eric on 04.26.05 at 08:29 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2250 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vigilante: An ill-defined Spanish word . . .:
» I'm almost speechless from Darleen's Place
This billboard is along the 605 freeway in So. California. Not, it's not a Photoshop. Thanks to Eric. Read the whole article.... [Read More] Tracked on April 26, 2005 10:08 AM
Comments
in spite of my liberal President (vigilantes indeed)and his allies the ACLU The Minutemen are helping us win the War on Terror. When I voted for W I thought he wanted to win the War on Terror; not unconditionaly surrender to Al Queda. It seems he lied to me or I was dumb. On Larry Elder’s show Wednesday night two weeks ago Larry said that the minutemen had reduced criminal immigration by 75%!. Or the rate of criminals crossing the border was only 25% of what it had been before the Minuteman Project! Sounds very positive! The Minutemen have proved that we can wint the local part of the War on Terror. All we ned is a conservative Pres. as opposed the liberal we elected. Rod Stanton · April 30, 2005 02:52 PM HAAAAAAAAAAAA u mofoss goooozy · May 12, 2005 05:10 AM yeah anyways when you read dis wirte back init ! anyways Great WEbSite haaaaaaaaa love you all omggggggg · May 14, 2005 11:44 AM this is one cool website( yeah im glad too that in spite of some libereal doo doo, you bumchums bother to read this website)anyyyyy wayzzzzzzzzzz yoooooooooooo gooooooozzzzzzyyyyyyyyyy, nice to be able to discuss this "beautiful" and "classical" website with you old pal. cheerio!!!!! ommmmggggggg urself · May 15, 2005 11:52 AM |
|
March 2007
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
War For Profit
How trying to prevent genocide becomes genocide I Have Not Yet Begun To Fight Wind Boom Isaiah Washington, victim Hippie Shirts A cunning exercise in liberation linguistics? Sometimes unprincipled demagogues are better than principled activists PETA agrees -- with me! The high pitched squeal of small carbon footprints
Links
Site Credits
|
|
There is a ton of stuff that I could say about this issue, but unfortunately, it is already 10 minutes past 5 in the morning... And I haven't slept yet! ;-)
I am glad to see that you are taking a good type of position on this issue... Even though I'm not going to address the political aspects of this matter, with regard to the Republicans and the Democrats, here right now, I commented about this some a few days ago here - wow, that was also at 5:10 (but PM!). Immigration reform is a winning issue - and could be used as such by Democrats as well as Republicans (so it would be best if the GOP got its act together, and seized upon this, before it becomes too late).
For the latest updates, events, news, and viewpoints on this issue, please check out the great website of Team America PAC:
www.teamamericapac.org