Gravity is moving down Hill

Someone's come up with a new political Rube Goldberg-style contraption, and I want one!

It's a Hill-O-Meter!

April 7, 2005 -- WASHINGTON — One of the nation's top pollsters has created a new "Hillary Meter" to measure Sen. Clinton's move to the political center for a 2008 White House run - it shows she's made progress but has a long way to go.

"Right now, she's too far away from the center to win unless Republicans nominate someone who is even further away," said independent pollster Scott Rasmussen.

His meter calculates that Clinton is now 52 points to the left of the political center — a bit closer to center than in January, when she was 59 points to the left.

Rasmussen said he created the meter because of his "fascination" with Clinton as "the only defining actor" for 2008. Deborah Orin

Intrigued by this, I went to the Rasmussen Center in hope of finding the Hill-O-Meter itself. Instead I found reams of statistics. Like these:
While moderating her image, Mrs. Clinton remains a polarizing figure--32% say that if she is the Democratic nominee, they will definitely vote FOR her. A slightly larger number, 37% will definitely vote AGAINST. Twenty-six percent (26%) say it depends upon who she runs against.

Among women, 33% would definitely vote FOR Senator Clinton while 34% would definitely vote AGAINST her.

Forty-four percent (44%) of Americans have a favorable opinion of Senator Clinton while 40% have an unfavorable view. That's little changed over the past month.

In January, Hillary Clinton had a 47% to 40% lead over Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in a hypothetical match-up.

More recently, we found that Senator Clinton holds a wide lead over Vice President Dick Cheney, 49% to 30%.

Blah blah blah. Et cetera and so forth.

Where's my Hill-O-Meter, dammit? The Rasmussen Center insists that I pay $95.00 to join for more detail. But I see no guarantee that I'll receive the type of meter I want.

Do I have to do everything myself?

Sheesh!

UPDATE: Well, there's this lame attempt, but I don't think Hillary would like it:

HILL-O-Meter.JPG

Obviously, the needle isn't pointing in the right direction.

(Must be time to feed the meter.... For enough money, I think could make it move!)

posted by Eric on 04.07.05 at 11:36 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/2187



Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gravity is moving down Hill:

» How successfully has Hillary moved toward the center? from rand holman's THE DAILY POLEMIC
Well, we all knew that Hillary was trying to get to the center for her run for President in '08, and we all have heard how she has spoken some surprising support for subjects we wouldn't have thought she would have supported, yadda, yadda, yadda. [Read More]
Tracked on April 7, 2005 08:21 PM



Comments

95 dollars is a rip.

jr   ·  April 7, 2005 12:05 PM

You're damn right! I built a much cheaper one for mere pennies in bandwidth. Enough contributions might make it move!

Eric Scheie   ·  April 7, 2005 02:11 PM


March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits